Analysis of characteristics of GPS AROF procedures for application to precision landings

GPS Ambiguity Resolution On-The-Fly (AROF) procedures process DGPS code and carrier phase measurements to deliver in real-time a very accurate position estimate. They are very attractive to the civil aviation community, but questions still remain about their reliability. The aim of this article is to present a state of the art analysis of the characteristics of the GPS AROF procedures through comparison of several methods. It constitutes a contribution to the evaluation of the applicability of these procedures to precision landings. Using requirements proposed for CAT II/III landings, constraints are extracted on four identified sets of parameters, such as performances, processing modes, means of control and working assumptions. Then, these parameters are determined for four particular procedures, namely the LSAST (Least Squares Ambiguity Search Procedure), MAPAS (Maximum A Posteriori Ambiguity Search), DIAS (Direct Integer Ambiguity Search) and FASF (Fast Ambiguity Search Filter) methods, following principles presented in corresponding publications and after an adaptation of algorithms. This determination is done on a theoretical and practical basis in several configurations. Mathematical developments provide an analysis of performances, and simulations of data for L1 measurements, pseudolites and perturbations such as multipath errors are used to assess the values of the parameters.

[1]  Ron Hatch,et al.  Instantaneous Ambiguity Resolution , 1991 .

[2]  P. Teunissen A new method for fast carrier phase ambiguity estimation , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Position, Location and Navigation Symposium - PLANS'94.

[3]  Ming Wei,et al.  Fast Ambiguity Resolution Using an Integer Nonlinear Programming Method , 1995 .

[4]  Herbert Landau,et al.  On-the-Fly Ambiguity Resolution for Precise Differential Positioning , 1992 .

[5]  Hans-Juergen Euler,et al.  Comparison of Several AROF Kinematic Techniques , 1994 .

[6]  G. Lachapelle,et al.  High‐precision GPS navigation with emphasis on carrier‐phase ambiguity resolution , 1992 .

[7]  Dingsheng Chen,et al.  Fast Ambiguity Search Filter (FASF): A Nova1 Concept for GPS Ambiguity Resolution , 1993 .

[8]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  Asymptotic efficiency of a sequential multihypothesis test , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  C. Macabiau,et al.  Analysis of the error probability and stopping time of the MAPAS procedure , 1996 .

[10]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  A sequential procedure for multihypothesis testing , 1994, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  C. Macabiau A new concept for GPS phase ambiguity resolution on-the-fly : the maximum a posteriori ambiguity search (MAPAS) method , 1995 .

[12]  Benjamin W. Remondi,et al.  Pseudo-Kinematic GPS Results Using the Ambiguity Function Method , 1991 .

[13]  Gang Lu,et al.  Statistical Quality Control for Kinematic GPS Positioning , 1991 .