Power influences the expression of Honesty-Humility: The power-exploitation affordances hypothesis

[1]  R. D. de Vries,et al.  Noncompliant responding: Comparing exclusion criteria in MTurk personality research to improve data quality , 2019, Personality and Individual Differences.

[2]  P. Burgmer,et al.  Power increases the self-serving bias in the attribution of collective successes and failures , 2018, European Journal of Social Psychology.

[3]  M. Ashton,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO-100 , 2018, Assessment.

[4]  R. D. Vries.  Three Nightmare Traits in Leaders. , 2018 .

[5]  Scott Clifford,et al.  Validity and Mechanical Turk: An assessment of exclusion methods and interactive experiments , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  R. D. Pathak,et al.  Explaining Unethical Business Decisions: The role of personality, environment, and states , 2017 .

[7]  J. Hirsh,et al.  The Psychology of Middle Power: Vertical Code-Switching, Role Conflict, and Behavioral Inhibition , 2017 .

[8]  R. D. Vries,et al.  Supervisor's HEXACO personality traits and subordinate perceptions of abusive supervision , 2017 .

[9]  Fabiola H. Gerpott,et al.  How Do People Think About Interdependence? A Multidimensional Model of Subjective Outcome Interdependence , 2017, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  E. Ferguson,et al.  Individual Differences in Good Manners Rather Than Compassion Predict Fair Allocations of Wealth in the Dictator Game. , 2017, Journal of personality.

[11]  Antonio A. Arechar,et al.  Conducting interactive experiments online , 2017, Experimental Economics.

[12]  T. V. Pollet,et al.  Evolution, situational affordances, and the HEXACO model of personality , 2016 .

[13]  D. Balliet,et al.  Gossip Versus Punishment: The Efficiency of Reputation to Promote and Maintain Cooperation , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[14]  Floor Rink,et al.  To Have Control Over or to Be Free From Others? The Desire for Power Reflects a Need for Autonomy , 2016, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[15]  P. V. van Lange,et al.  Prospection in Individual and Interpersonal Corruption Dilemmas , 2016 .

[16]  David G. Rand,et al.  Think global, act local: Preserving the global commons , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Reinout E. de Vries,et al.  Explaining workplace delinquency: The role of Honesty–Humility, ethical culture, and employee surveillance , 2015 .

[18]  Denise R. Beike,et al.  Throwing You Under the Bus: High Power People Knowingly Harm Others When Offered Small Incentives , 2015 .

[19]  L. Smillie,et al.  The Role of Interpersonal Traits in Social Decision Making , 2015, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[20]  B. Hilbig,et al.  Different Games for Different Motives: Comment on Haesevoets, Folmer, and Van Hiel (2015) , 2015 .

[21]  Samuel Bendahan,et al.  Leader corruption depends on power and testosterone , 2015 .

[22]  John Antonakis,et al.  Interpersonal Power , 2015 .

[23]  M. Ashton,et al.  The Dark Triad, the Big Five, and the HEXACO model , 2014 .

[24]  B. Hilbig,et al.  Willing to give but not to forgive: borderline personality features and cooperative behavior. , 2014, Journal of personality disorders.

[25]  C. Anderson,et al.  Perspectives on Power in Organizations , 2014 .

[26]  Melissa J. Williams.  Serving the Self From the Seat of Power , 2014 .

[27]  M. Ashton,et al.  The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality Factors , 2014, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[28]  Jesse Chandler,et al.  Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[29]  M. Vugt,et al.  The evolutionary psychology of leadership , 2014 .

[30]  Benjamin E. Hilbig,et al.  It takes two : Honesty-humility and agreeableness differentially predict active versus reactive cooperation , 2013 .

[31]  M. Ashton,et al.  Sex, Power, and Money: Prediction from the Dark Triad and Honesty–Humility , 2013 .

[32]  Stefan Thau,et al.  Masters of the universe: how power and accountability influence self-serving decisions under moral hazard. , 2013, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  Joe C. Magee,et al.  The Social Distance Theory of Power , 2013, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[34]  Reinout E. de Vries,et al.  Personality predictors of leadership styles and the self-other agreement problem , 2012 .

[35]  Axel Franzen,et al.  The external validity of giving in the dictator game , 2012 .

[36]  B. Hilbig,et al.  Personality, Punishment and Public Goods: Strategic Shifts towards Cooperation as a Matter of Dispositional Honesty–Humility , 2012 .

[37]  A. Guinote,et al.  Does Power Magnify the Expression of Dispositions? , 2012, Psychological science.

[38]  D. S. Derue,et al.  Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  Timothy C. Bates,et al.  Personality accounts for stable preferences and expectations across a range of simple games , 2011 .

[40]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Social Psychological Perspectives on Power in Organizations , 2011 .

[41]  E. Cartwright,et al.  Selfish or servant leadership? Evolutionary predictions on leadership personalities in coordination games , 2011 .

[42]  E. Glenn Dutcher,et al.  The dynamics of responder behavior in ultimatum games: a meta-study , 2011 .

[43]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  Generous Paupers and Stingy Princes: Power Drives Consumer Spending on Self versus Others , 2011 .

[44]  L. Heres,et al.  How to Measure Integrity Violations , 2011 .

[45]  Hans-Theo Normann,et al.  A Within-Subject Analysis of Other-Regarding Preferences , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[46]  Paul Babiak,et al.  Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk. , 2010, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[47]  Christoph Engel,et al.  Dictator games: a meta study , 2010 .

[48]  Gerard Saucier,et al.  Recurrent personality dimensions in inclusive lexical studies: indications for a big six structure. , 2009, Journal of personality.

[49]  R. E. D. Vries,et al.  De zes belangrijkste persoonlijkheidsdimensies en de HEXACO Persoonlijkheidsvragenlijst. , 2009 .

[50]  B. Hilbig,et al.  Pillars of cooperation: Honesty-Humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior , 2009 .

[51]  M. Withey,et al.  The Strong Situation Hypothesis , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[52]  Katie A. Liljenquist,et al.  Power reduces the press of the situation: implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  Michel J. J. Handgraaf,et al.  Less power or powerless? Egocentric empathy gaps and the irony of having little versus no power in social decision making. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  M. Ashton,et al.  The prediction of Honesty–Humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and Five-Factor Models of personality , 2008 .

[55]  Avner Ben-Ner,et al.  Economic and hypothetical dictator game experiments: Incentive effects at the individual level , 2008 .

[56]  N. Dempster.  What do we know about leadership , 2008 .

[57]  H. P. Sims,et al.  The roles of vertical and shared leadership in the enactment of executive corruption: Implications for research and practice , 2008 .

[58]  M. Pillutla,et al.  Power gained, power lost ☆ , 2008 .

[59]  M. Ashton,et al.  The Dutch HEXACO Personality Inventory: Psychometric Properties, Self–Other Agreement, and Relations With Psychopathy Among Low and High Acquaintanceship Dyads , 2008, Journal of personality assessment.

[60]  Mark Van Vugt,et al.  From Games to Giving: Social Value Orientation Predicts Donations to Noble Causes , 2007 .

[61]  Robert Hogan,et al.  The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. , 2007 .

[62]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[63]  M. Ashton,et al.  Empirical, Theoretical, and Practical Advantages of the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[64]  Margaret A. Marshall,et al.  Trait Aggressiveness and Situational Provocation: A Test of the Traits as Situational Sensitivities (TASS) Model , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[65]  David C. Funder,et al.  Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behaviors , 2006 .

[66]  D. Cremer,et al.  I'm Doing the Best I Can (for Myself): Leadership and Variance of Harvesting in Resource Dilemmas , 2005 .

[67]  Eric van Dijk,et al.  When and why leaders put themselves first: leader behaviour in resource allocations as a function of feeling entitled , 2005 .

[68]  Robert Hogan,et al.  What we know about Leadership , 2005 .

[69]  M. Ashton,et al.  Predicting Workplace Delinquency and Integrity with the HEXACO and Five-Factor Models of Personality Structure , 2005 .

[70]  Dean S. Karlan.  Using Experimental Economics to Measure Social Capital and Predict Financial Decisions , 2005 .

[71]  Michel J. J. Handgraaf,et al.  Social value orientations and the strategic use of fairness in ultimatum bargaining , 2004 .

[72]  M. Ashton,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory , 2004, Multivariate behavioral research.

[73]  Marco Perugini,et al.  A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[74]  Joe C Magee,et al.  From power to action. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[75]  R. Tett,et al.  A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[76]  H. Oosterbeek,et al.  Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[77]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[78]  Ramzi Suleiman,et al.  Expectations and fairness in a modified Ultimatum game , 1996 .

[79]  J. Horowitz,et al.  Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments , 1994 .

[80]  Clinton O. Longenecker,et al.  The Bathsheba Syndrome: The ethical failure of successful leaders , 1993 .

[81]  Scott T. Allison,et al.  Social Value Orientation and Helping Behavior1 , 1989 .

[82]  D. Jackson,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF THE VALIDITY OF THE PERSONALITY RESEARCH FORM WITH FILIPINO UNIVERSITY STUDENTS , 1987 .

[83]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[84]  D. Kipnis,et al.  Does power corrupt? , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[85]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions. , 2015 .

[86]  Manfred J. Schmitt,et al.  Economic games: A performance-based assessment of fairness and altruism , 2014 .

[87]  Joshua M. Tybur,et al.  The Evolutionary Foundations of Hierarchy : Status , Dominance , Prestige , and Leadership , 2014 .

[88]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status , 2008 .

[89]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[90]  J. M. Digman.  PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[91]  A. Tellegen,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure , 2022 .