The administration of the paper and electronic versions of the Manual Ability Measure-36 (MAM-36) and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is equivalent in people with multiple sclerosis.

[1]  L. Leocani,et al.  The agenda of the global patient reported outcomes for multiple sclerosis (PROMS) initiative: Progresses and open questions. , 2022, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[2]  X. Montalban,et al.  Developing a Digital Solution for Remote Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis: From Concept to Software as a Medical Device , 2021, Brain sciences.

[3]  S. Shahraz,et al.  Does scrolling affect measurement equivalence of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROM)? Results of a quantitative equivalence study , 2021, Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

[4]  T. Ziemssen,et al.  Should We Use Clinical Tools to Identify Disease Progression? , 2021, Frontiers in Neurology.

[5]  G. Brichetto.  We should monitor our patients with wearable technology instead of neurological examination – Commentary , 2020, Multiple sclerosis.

[6]  K. Schmierer,et al.  Can We Improve the Monitoring of People With Multiple Sclerosis Using Simple Tools, Data Sharing, and Patient Engagement? , 2020, Frontiers in Neurology.

[7]  M. Hotopf,et al.  Using Smartphones and Wearable Devices to Monitor Behavioral Changes During COVID-19 , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  G. Brichetto,et al.  Italian translation and psychometric validation of the Manual Ability Measure-36 (MAM-36) and its correlation with an objective measure of upper limb function in patients with multiple sclerosis , 2020, Neurological Sciences.

[9]  Annalisa Barla,et al.  The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach , 2019, Neurological Sciences.

[10]  Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi,et al.  Key methodological considerations for usability testing of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems , 2019, Quality of Life Research.

[11]  Giampaolo Brichetto,et al.  Beyond center-based testing: Understanding and improving functioning with wearable technology in MS , 2019, Multiple sclerosis.

[12]  Tjalf Ziemssen,et al.  Review: Patient-reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis care. , 2019, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[13]  L. Kalankesh,et al.  Mobile Applications for Multiple Sclerosis: a Focus on Self-Management , 2019, Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH.

[14]  Markus R. Lange,et al.  Predicting risk of secondary progression in multiple sclerosis: A nomogram , 2018, Multiple sclerosis.

[15]  Peter Feys,et al.  The Use of Digital and Remote Communication Technologies as a Tool for Multiple Sclerosis Management: Narrative Review , 2018, JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies.

[16]  G. Almeida,et al.  Physiotherapy Questionnaires App to Deliver Main Musculoskeletal Assessment Questionnaires: Development and Validation Study , 2018, JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies.

[17]  Tetsuo Kimura,et al.  The impacts of computer adaptive testing from a variety of perspectives , 2017, Journal of educational evaluation for health professions.

[18]  Gavin Giovannoni,et al.  The importance of a multi-disciplinary perspective and patient activation programmes in MS management , 2016, Multiple sclerosis.

[19]  Leonardo Pellicciari,et al.  Rasch analysis of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Italian subjects with multiple sclerosis. , 2016, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[20]  C. Cox,et al.  Usability Testing of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System for Survivors of Critical Illness. , 2016, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[21]  Cheryl Cott,et al.  The Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Tool: Testing Usability and Feasibility of a Mobile App and Portal to Support Care for Patients With Complex Chronic Disease and Disability in Primary Care Settings , 2016, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[22]  K. Damm,et al.  Patient- and person-reports on healthcare: preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction – an essay , 2016, Health Economics Review.

[23]  Kara Schick-Makaroff,et al.  Strategies to use tablet computers for collection of electronic patient-reported outcomes , 2015, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

[24]  Manjinder S. Sandhu,et al.  Open-source electronic data capture system offered increased accuracy and cost-effectiveness compared with paper methods in Africa , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[25]  C. Botella,et al.  Ecological momentary assessment for chronic pain in fibromyalgia using a smartphone: A randomized crossover study , 2014, European journal of pain.

[26]  D. Bates,et al.  In search of a few good apps. , 2014, JAMA.

[27]  Vivian Lo,et al.  Evaluation of the Accuracy of Smartphone Medical Calculation Apps , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[28]  A. Zbrozek,et al.  Validation of electronic systems to collect patient-reported outcome (PRO) data-recommendations for clinical trial teams: report of the ISPOR ePRO systems validation good research practices task force. , 2013, Value in Health.

[29]  Nick Black,et al.  Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare , 2013, BMJ.

[30]  Opher Caspi,et al.  Participatory medicine and patient empowerment towards personalized healthcare in multiple sclerosis , 2012, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[31]  David Cella,et al.  Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. , 2009, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[32]  D. Jette,et al.  Use of Standardized Outcome Measures in Physical Therapist Practice: Perceptions and Applications , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[33]  S. Burdette,et al.  Surfing the web: practicing medicine in a technological age: using smartphones in clinical practice. , 2008, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[34]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. , 2008, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[35]  N. Hjollund,et al.  Response Rate and Completeness of Questionnaires: A Randomized Study of Internet Versus Paper-and-Pencil Versions , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[36]  B. Ogles,et al.  Why Some Clinicians Use Outcome Measures and Others Do Not , 2007, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[37]  Ingela Wiklund,et al.  Assessment of patient‐reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health‐related quality of life , 2004, Fundamental & clinical pharmacology.