Automated Detection of Clouds in Satellite Imagery

Many different approaches have been used to automatically detect clouds in satellite imagery. Most approaches are deterministic and provide a binary cloud - no cloud product used in a variety of applications. Some of these applications require the identification of cloudy pixels for cloud parameter retrieval, while others require only an ability to mask out clouds for the retrieval of surface or atmospheric parameters in the absence of clouds. A few approaches estimate a probability of the presence of a cloud at each point in an image. These probabilities allow a user to select cloud information based on the tolerance of the application to uncertainty in the estimate. Many automated cloud detection techniques develop sophisticated tests using a combination of visible and infrared channels to determine the presence of clouds in both day and night imagery. Visible channels are quite effective in detecting clouds during the day, as long as test thresholds properly account for variations in surface features and atmospheric scattering. Cloud detection at night is more challenging, since only courser resolution infrared measurements are available. A few schemes use just two infrared channels for day and night cloud detection. The most influential factor in the success of a particular technique is the determination of the thresholds for each cloud test. The techniques which perform the best usually have thresholds that are varied based on the geographic region, time of year, time of day and solar angle.

[1]  Gary J. Jedlovec,et al.  Spatially Varying Spectrally Thresholds for MODIS Cloud Detection , 2004 .

[2]  Jason I. Gobat,et al.  Improved cloud detection in GOES scenes over land , 1995 .

[3]  Randall J. Alliss.  The Development of Cloud Retrieval Algorithms Applied to GOES Digital Data , 2000 .

[4]  R. Saunders,et al.  An improved method for detecting clear sky and cloudy radiances from AVHRR data , 1988 .

[5]  F. Bretherton,et al.  Cloud cover from high-resolution scanner data - Detecting and allowing for partially filled fields of view , 1982 .

[6]  Christopher J. Merchant,et al.  NOAA's Sea Surface Temperature Products From Operational Geostationary Satellites , 2008 .

[7]  Richard A. Frey,et al.  Cloud Detection with MODIS. Part I: Improvements in the MODIS Cloud Mask for Collection 5 , 2008 .

[8]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  Cloud and aerosol properties, precipitable water, and profiles of temperature and water vapor from MODIS , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  Steven A. Ackerman,et al.  A Validation Study of the GOES Sounder Cloud Top Pressure Product , 2000 .

[10]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  A Comparison of Ground and Satellite Observations of Cloud Cover , 1993 .

[11]  Jason I. Gobat,et al.  Improved cloud detection in GOES scenes over the oceans , 1995 .

[12]  Ann Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Cloud detection and analysis: A review of recent progress , 1988 .

[13]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  Observations and trends of clouds based on GOES sounder data , 2001 .

[14]  A. Mcnally,et al.  A cloud detection algorithm for high‐spectral‐resolution infrared sounders , 2003 .

[15]  Maximilian Reuter,et al.  The CM-SAF and FUB Cloud Detection Schemes for SEVIRI: Validation with Synoptic Data and Initial Comparison with MODIS and CALIPSO , 2009 .

[16]  W. Menzel,et al.  Discriminating clear sky from clouds with MODIS , 1998 .

[17]  Christopher J. Merchant,et al.  Probabilistic physically based cloud screening of satellite infrared imagery for operational sea surface temperature retrieval , 2005 .

[18]  W. Rossow,et al.  Cloud Detection Using Satellite Measurements of Infrared and Visible Radiances for ISCCP , 1993 .

[19]  Frank J. LaFontaine,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Varying Thresholds for Cloud Detection in GOES Imagery , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.