Conceptual progress towards predicting quantitative ecosystem benefits of ecological restorations

Satisfying the needs of mitigation for losses of habitat and biological resources demands further development of ecological theory to improve quantitative predictions of benefits of ecological restoration projects. Several limitations now exist in scaling compensatory restoration to match losses of ecosystem services. Scaling of restoration projects has historically been done by area of habitat, assuming that function follows. One recent development in compensatory mitigation uses a currency of secondary production, which has the important merit of specifying one measurable, functional goal against which to judge success. Future development of the fundamental basis for restoration ecology might profitably include: (1) identifying and quantifying important ecosystem services to serve as alternative goals of restoration; (2) discriminating among size classes in a population in estimating their contributions to ecosystem services; (3) re-evaluating the practice of restoring the populations of only a few representative or dominant species to replace a diversity of species losses; (4) contrasting the success of habitat restorations versus population enhancements; (5) incorporating more landscape- scale considerations into ecosystem-based restoration designs; (6) injecting more formal uncertainty analyses into scaling restoration projects; (7) enhancing the basic science of population, community, and ecosystem ecology to improve the capacity of the discipline to predict impacts of interventions; (8) integrating empirical and theoretical developments in food web dynamics to resolve contradictions in our models of how population changes propagate across trophic levels; and (9) incorporating the concept that populations, communities or ecosystems targeted for restoration may now be in alterna- tive states and that restoration targets have been biased by shifting historical baselines. Forging part- nerships between the practitioners of ecological restoration and basic ecologists holds a dual promise for testing ecological theory and for improving the effectiveness of environmental restoration.

[1]  D. Pauly,et al.  Fishing down marine food webs , 1998, Science.

[2]  S. Bell,et al.  Influence of physical setting on seagrass landscapes near Beaufort, North Carolina, USA , 1998 .

[3]  G. Polis,et al.  TOWARD AN INTEGRATION OF LANDSCAPE AND FOOD WEB ECOLOGY : The Dynamics of Spatially Subsidized Food Webs , 2005 .

[4]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Must top predators be culled for the sake of fisheries? , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Lake restoration: capabilities and needs , 1999, Hydrobiologia.

[6]  J. Pinckney,et al.  Biomass and production of benthic microalgal communities in estuarine habitats , 1993 .

[7]  Donald A. Falk,et al.  Developing the Conceptual Basis for Restoration Ecology , 1997 .

[8]  C. Peterson,et al.  The influence of seagrass cover on population structure and individual growth rate of a suspension-feeding bivalve, Mercenaria mercenaria. , 1984 .

[9]  James F. Quinn,et al.  Harvest Refugia in Marine Invertebrate Fisheries: Models and Applications to the Red Sea Urchin, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus , 1993 .

[10]  R. Taylor Predators and predation , 1984 .

[11]  Linda A. Deegan,et al.  Evidence for spatial variability in estuarine food webs , 1997 .

[12]  H. M. Page,et al.  Diet of intertidal bivalves in the Ría de Arosa (NW Spain): evidence from stable C and N isotope analysis , 2003 .

[13]  J. Castilla,et al.  The management of fisheries and marine ecosystems , 1997 .

[14]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems , 2001, Nature.

[15]  G. Hays,et al.  Critical evaluation of the nursery role hypothesis for seagrass meadows , 2003 .

[16]  J. Zedler,et al.  Progress in wetland restoration ecology. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  M. Palmer,et al.  Ecological Theory and Community Restoration Ecology , 1997 .

[18]  W. C. Allee Animal Aggregations: A Study in General Sociology , 1931 .

[19]  Nick T. Shears,et al.  Changes in community structure in temperate marine reserves , 1999 .

[20]  R. Kneib Bioenergetic and landscape considerations for scaling expectations of nekton production from intertidal marshes , 2003 .

[21]  Leslie A. Real,et al.  The Sustainable Biosphere Initiative: An Ecological Research Agenda: A Report from the Ecological Society of America , 1991 .

[22]  Sean P. Powers,et al.  Scaling restoration to achieve quantitative enhancement of loon, seaduck, and other seabird populations , 2003 .

[23]  D. Eggleston,et al.  Marine reserves for Caribbean spiny lobster: empirical evaluation and theoretical metapopulation recruitment dynamics , 2001 .

[24]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Corncrake Pie and Prediction in Ecology , 1996 .

[25]  K. Bjorndal,et al.  Historical Overfishing and the Recent Collapse of Coastal Ecosystems , 2001, Science.

[26]  Jonathan H. Grabowski,et al.  Cascading of habitat degradation: Oyster reefs invaded by refugee fishes escaping stress , 2001 .

[27]  P. Reich,et al.  The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes , 1997 .

[28]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[29]  F. Wilson Temporal and spatial patterns of settlement: a field study of molluscs in Bogue Sound, North Carolina , 1990 .

[30]  C. Peterson Clam predation by whelks (Busycon spp.): Experimental tests of the importance of prey size, prey density, and seagrass cover , 1982 .

[31]  Grenfell,et al.  Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  H. Paerl,et al.  The role of standing dead Spartina alterniflora and benthic microalgae in salt marsh food webs: Considerations based on multiple stable isotope analysis , 1995 .

[33]  W. Stockhausen,et al.  Concurrent decline of the spawning stock, recruitment, larval abundance, and size of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus in Chesapeake Bay , 2002 .

[34]  Shahid Naeem,et al.  Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability , 1997, Nature.

[35]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience , 2003 .

[36]  E. Irlandi,et al.  Habitat linkages: the effect of intertidal saltmarshes and adjacent subtidal habitats on abundance, movement, and growth of an estuarine fish , 1997, Oecologia.

[37]  National Research Council,et al.  Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems. , 1993 .

[38]  K. Reckhow Water quality prediction and probability network models , 1999 .

[39]  Will F. Figueira,et al.  Source-sink population dynamics and the problem of siting marine reserves , 2000 .

[40]  Fonseca,et al.  Development of planted seagrass beds in Tampa Bay, Florida, USA. II. Faunal components , 1996 .

[41]  W. S. Arnold The effects of prey size, predator size, and sediment composition on the rate of predation of the blue crab, Callinectes Sapidus Rathbun, on the hard clam, MercenariaMercenaria (Linné) , 1984 .

[42]  A. Hastings,et al.  PRINCIPLES FOR THE DESIGN OF MARINE RESERVES , 2003 .

[43]  K. Able,et al.  Mechanisms of marsh habitat alteration due toPhragmites: Response of young-of-the-year mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) to treatment forPhragmites removal , 2003 .

[44]  M. Bertness,et al.  A trophic cascade regulates salt marsh primary production , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Robert R. Christian,et al.  CONSEQUENCES OF HYPOXIA ON ESTUARINE ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION: ENERGY DIVERSION FROM CONSUMERS TO MICROBES , 2004 .

[46]  S. Nixon Coastal marine eutrophication: A definition, social causes, and future concerns , 1995 .

[47]  C. Peterson,et al.  Scaling restoration actions in the marine environment to meet quantitative targets of enhanced ecosystem services , 2003 .

[48]  J. E. Eckman The role of hydrodynamics in recruitment, growth, and survival of Argopecten irradians (L.) and Anomia simplex (D'Orbigny) within eelgrass meadows , 1987 .

[49]  D. McCay,et al.  Scaling restoration of American lobsters: combined demographic and discounting model for an exploited species , 2003 .

[50]  Michael Donlan,et al.  Compensatory mitigation for injury to a threatened or endangered species: scaling piping plover restoration , 2003 .

[51]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Restoration Ecology: Repairing the Earth's Ecosystems in the New Millennium , 2001 .

[52]  C. Peterson Quantitative allometry of gamete production by Mercenaria mercenaria into old age , 1986 .

[53]  S. Weisberg,et al.  An estuarine benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for Chesapeake Bay , 1997 .

[54]  L. Cammen Abundance and Production of Macroinvertebrates from Natural and Artificially Established Salt Marshes in North Carolina , 1976 .

[55]  Charles H. Peterson,et al.  Estuarine Vegetated Habitats as Corridors for Predator Movements , 1999 .

[56]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  ECOLOGICAL FUTURES: BUILDING AN ECOLOGY OF THE LONG NOW1 , 2002 .

[57]  L. G. Abele,et al.  Experiments on Competition and Predation Among Shrimps of Seagrass Meadows , 1981 .

[58]  Jonathan H. Grabowski,et al.  Estimated enhancement of fish production resulting from restoring oyster reef habitat: quantitative valuation , 2003 .

[59]  Brian E. Julius,et al.  Integrating biology and economics in seagrass restoration: How much is enough and why? , 2000 .

[60]  Steven D. Gaines,et al.  PLUGGING A HOLE IN THE OCEAN: THE EMERGING SCIENCE OF MARINE RESERVES1 , 2003 .

[61]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Impacts of dispersal, ecological interactions, and fishing effort dynamics on efficacy of marine protected areas : How large should protected areas be ? , 2000 .

[62]  D. McCay,et al.  Habitat restoration as mitigation for lost production at multiple trophic levels , 2003 .

[63]  C. Peterson Recruitment overfishing in a bivalve mollusc fishery: hard clams (Mercenaria mercenaria) in North Carolina , 2002 .

[64]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  What Is the Allee Effect , 1999 .

[65]  M. Sullivan,et al.  Edaphic algae are an important component of salt marsh food-webs: evidence from multiple stable isotope analyses , 1990 .

[66]  C. Peterson,et al.  Restoration that targets function as opposed to structure: replacing lost bivalve production and filtration , 2003 .

[67]  Alice A. Shelly,et al.  Restored Top Carnivores as Detriments to the Performance of Marine Protected Areas Intended for Fishery Sustainability: a Case Study with Red Abalones and Sea Otters , 2003 .

[68]  E. D. Seneca,et al.  Propagation of Spartina Alterniflora for Substrate Stabilization and Salt Marsh Development , 2018 .

[69]  David Starrett,et al.  Coping With Uncertainty: A Call for a New Science-Policy Forum , 2003, Ambio.

[70]  T. Minello,et al.  Salt Marsh Linkages to Productivity of Penaeid Shrimps and Blue Crabs in the Northern Gulf of Mexico , 2002 .

[71]  M. Tegner,et al.  Sea urchin recruitment patterns and implications of commercial fishing. , 1977, Science.

[72]  P. Young Restoration ecology and conservation biology Truman , 1999 .

[73]  M. Fonseca,et al.  Guidelines for the conservation and restoration of seagrasses in the United States and adjacent waters , 1998 .

[74]  D. Eggleston,et al.  DENSITY‐DEPENDENT PREDATION, HABITAT VARIATION, AND THE PERSISTENCE OF MARINE BIVALVE PREY , 2001 .

[75]  P. Richard,et al.  Isotopic Determination of Food Sources ofCrassostrea gigasAlong a Trophic Gradient in the Estuarine Bay of Marennes-Ol éron , 1996 .

[76]  M. Fonseca,et al.  Effects of seagrass landscape structure, structural complexity and hydrodynamic regime on macrofaunal densities in North Carolina seagrass beds , 2002 .

[77]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  ENSURING PERSISTENCE OF MARINE RESERVES: CATASTROPHES REQUIRE ADOPTING AN INSURANCE FACTOR , 2003 .