Estimating earthquake hazard parameters from instrumental data for different regions in and around Turkey

Abstract We conducted a study of the spatial distributions of seismicity and earthquake hazard parameters for Turkey and the adjacent areas, applying the maximum likelihood method. The procedure allows for the use of either historical or instrumental data, or even a combination of the two. By using this method, we can estimate the earthquake hazard parameters, which include the maximum regional magnitude Mˆ max , the activity rate of seismic events and the well-known bˆ value, which is the slope of the frequency-magnitude Gutenberg-Richter relationship. These three parameters are determined simultaneously using an iterative scheme. The uncertainty in the determination of the magnitudes was also taken into consideration. The return periods ( RP ) of earthquakes with a magnitude M ≥ m are also evaluated. The whole examined area is divided into 24 seismic regions based on their seismotectonic regime. The homogeneity of the magnitudes is an essential factor in such studies. In order to achieve homogeneity of the magnitudes, formulas that convert any magnitude to an M S -surface scale are developed. New completeness cutoffs and their corresponding time intervals are also assessed for each of the 24 seismic regions. Each of the obtained parameters is distributed into its respective seismic region, allowing for an analysis of the localized seismicity parameters and a representation of their regional variation on a map. The earthquake hazard level is also calculated as a function of the form Θ  = ( Mˆ max , RP 6.0 ), and a relative hazard scale (defined as the index K ) is defined for each seismic region. The investigated regions are then classified into five groups using these parameters. This classification is useful for theoretical and practical reasons and provides a picture of quantitative seismicity. An attempt is then made to relate these values to the local tectonics.

[1]  Application of the extreme magnitude distributions to incomplete earthquake files , 1987 .

[2]  Domenico Giardini,et al.  Unified seismic hazard modelling throughout the Mediterranean region , 2000 .

[3]  D. Ruppert,et al.  The Use and Misuse of Orthogonal Regression in Linear Errors-in-Variables Models , 1996 .

[4]  Andrzej Kijko,et al.  Estimation of the Maximum Earthquake Magnitude, mmax , 2004 .

[5]  Polat Gülkan,et al.  A probabilistic assessment of the seismic hazard in Turkey , 1985 .

[6]  Andrzej Kijko,et al.  A Modified Form of the First Gumbel Distribution Model for the Occurrence of Large Earthquakes , 1983 .

[7]  B. Papazachos,et al.  Geophysical and tectonic features of the Aegean Arc , 1971 .

[8]  Maximum likelihood estimation of Gutenberg-Richterb parameter for uncertain magnitude values , 1988 .

[9]  Mustafa Erdik,et al.  Assessment of earthquake hazard in Turkey and neighboring , 1999 .

[10]  Seismic risk in Turkey — a preliminary approach , 1979 .

[11]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[12]  D. McKenzie Active Tectonics of the Mediterranean Region , 1972 .

[13]  W. Ryan,et al.  Plate Tectonics and the Evolution of the Alpine System , 1973 .

[14]  Y. Bayrak,et al.  Relationships Between Fundamental Seismic Hazard Parameters for the Different Source Regions in Turkey , 2005 .

[15]  Demitris Paradissis,et al.  Global Positioning System constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus , 2000 .

[16]  J. Jackson,et al.  A seismological study of normal faulting in the Demirci, Alaşehir and Gediz earthquakes of 1969–70 in western Turkey: implications for the nature and geometry of deformation in the continental crust , 1985 .

[17]  A. Kijko,et al.  Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part I. Utilization of extreme and complete catalogs with different threshold magnitudes , 1989 .

[18]  Kamil Kayabali,et al.  Seismic hazard map of Turkey using the deterministic approach , 2003 .

[19]  S. Crampin,et al.  The MARNET radiolinked seismometer network spanning the Marmara Sea and the seismicity of Western Turkey , 1985 .

[20]  C. Scholz The frequency-magnitude relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes , 1968 .

[21]  R. King,et al.  Global Positioning System offers evidence of plate motions in eastern Mediterranean , 1995, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union.

[22]  Yücel Yılmaz,et al.  Tethyan evolution of Turkey: A plate tectonic approach , 1981 .

[23]  Andrzej Kijko,et al.  Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part II. Incorporation of magnitude heterogeneity , 1992 .

[24]  X. Le Pichon,et al.  Geodetic determination of the kinematics of central Greece with respect to Europe: Implications for eastern Mediterranean tectonics , 1995 .

[25]  X. Pichon,et al.  The hellenic arc and trench system: A key to the neotectonic evolution of the eastern mediterranean area , 1979 .

[26]  T. Tsapanos,et al.  Geographical and vertical variation of the earth's seismicity , 1998 .

[27]  C. Yaltırak,et al.  Tectonic elements controlling the evolution of the Gulf of Saros (northeastern Aegean Sea, Turkey) , 1998 .

[28]  Kamil Kayabali,et al.  Modeling of seismic hazard for Turkey using the recent neotectonic data , 2002 .

[29]  H. Eyidog̃an Rates of crustal deformation in western Turkey as deduced from major earthquakes , 1988 .

[30]  Robert W. King,et al.  Global Positioning System measurements of present‐day crustal movements in the Arabia‐Africa‐Eurasia plate collision zone , 1997 .

[31]  T. Tsapanos b-Values of two tectonic parts in the circum-pacific belt , 1990 .

[32]  E. Bozkurt,et al.  Neotectonics of Turkey – a synthesis , 2001 .

[33]  D. McKenzie Active tectonics of the Alpine—Himalayan belt: the Aegean Sea and surrounding regions , 1978 .

[34]  Candan Gokceoglu,et al.  An attenuation relationship based on Turkish strong motion data and iso-acceleration map of Turkey , 2004 .