The EU Bioeconomy Footprint: Using life cycle assessment to monitor environmental impacts of the EU Bioeconomy

[1]  S. Sala,et al.  Social footprint of European food production and consumption , 2022, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[2]  A. Terceño,et al.  Research trends and hotspots in bioeconomy impact analysis: a study of economic, social and environmental impacts , 2022, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[3]  R. Jonsson,et al.  The quest for sustainable forest bioenergy: win-win solutions for climate and biodiversity , 2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[4]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment support to environmental ambitions of EU policies and the Sustainable Development Goals , 2022, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[5]  G. Philippidis,et al.  An output-based measurement of EU bioeconomy services: Marrying statistics with policy insight , 2021, Structural change and economic dynamics.

[6]  L. Tiruta-Barna.  A climate goal–based, multicriteria method for system evaluation in life cycle assessment , 2021, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[7]  H. Böttcher,et al.  Environmental and socioeconomic footprints of the German bioeconomy , 2021, Nature Sustainability.

[8]  Fulvio Ardente,et al.  The evolution of life cycle assessment in European policies over three decades , 2021, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[9]  M. Garfí,et al.  Low-cost anaerobic digester to promote the circular bioeconomy in the non-centrifugal cane sugar sector: A life cycle assessment. , 2021, Bioresource technology.

[10]  D. Tonini,et al.  Carbon footprint of plastic from biomass and recycled feedstock: methodological insights , 2021, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[11]  M. Brandão.  Do bioenergy, bioeconomy and circular economy systems mitigate climate change? Insights from life cycle assessment , 2020 .

[12]  Maria Teresa Borzacchiello,et al.  Development of a bioeconomy monitoring framework for the European Union: An integrative and collaborative approach , 2020, New biotechnology.

[13]  M. Carus,et al.  Developments of Economic Growth and Employment in Bioeconomy Sectors across the EU , 2020, Sustainability.

[14]  G. Fiore,et al.  Sustainability of food waste biorefinery: A review on valorisation pathways, techno-economic constraints, and environmental assessment. , 2020, Bioresource technology.

[15]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Environmental sustainability of European production and consumption assessed against planetary boundaries , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  J. Schweinle,et al.  Monitoring Sustainability Effects of the Bioeconomy: A Material Flow Based Approach Using the Example of Softwood Lumber and Its Core Product Epal 1 Pallet , 2020, Sustainability.

[17]  M. Finkbeiner,et al.  A Regional Socio-Economic Life Cycle Assessment of a Bioeconomy Value Chain , 2020, Sustainability.

[18]  D. Štreimikienė,et al.  The trends in bioeconomy development in the European Union: Exploiting capacity and productivity measures based on the land footprint approach , 2020 .

[19]  Stefano Amaducci,et al.  Flaws in the interpretation phase of bioenergy LCA fuel the debate and mislead policymakers , 2020, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[20]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Environmental impacts of household consumption in Europe: Comparing process-based LCA and environmentally extended input-output analysis , 2019, Journal of cleaner production.

[21]  A. Miceikienė,et al.  Environmental aspects of the implementation of bioeconomy in the Baltic Sea Region: An input-output approach , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[22]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Assessing the decoupling of economic growth from environmental impacts in the European Union: A consumption-based approach , 2019, Journal of cleaner production.

[23]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Global environmental impacts: data sources and methodological choices for calculating normalization factors for LCA , 2019, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[24]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Biodiversity impacts due to food consumption in Europe , 2019, Journal of cleaner production.

[25]  E. Gawel,et al.  A Path Transition Towards a Bioeconomy—The Crucial Role of Sustainability , 2019, Sustainability.

[26]  M. Giampietro,et al.  The Hijacking of the Bioeconomy , 2019, Ecological Economics.

[27]  G. Fischer,et al.  Quantifying the global cropland footprint of the European Union’s non-food bioeconomy , 2019, Environmental Research Letters.

[28]  S. Bringezu,et al.  Conceptualization of an Indicator System for Assessing the Sustainability of the Bioeconomy , 2019, Sustainability.

[29]  M. Hauschild,et al.  How to bring absolute sustainability into decision-making: An industry case study using a Planetary Boundary-based methodology. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[30]  Tévécia Ronzon,et al.  Socioeconomic Indicators to Monitor the EU’s Bioeconomy in Transition , 2018 .

[31]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Environmentally optimal wood use in Switzerland—Investigating the relevance of material cascades , 2018 .

[32]  Daniela Thrän,et al.  Social life cycle assessment: in pursuit of a framework for assessing wood-based products from bioeconomy regions in Germany , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[33]  Helga Pülzl,et al.  Sustainable development – A ‘selling point’ of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework? , 2018 .

[34]  Bernhard Steubing,et al.  Life Cycle Impacts and Benefits of Wood along the Value Chain: The Case of Switzerland , 2017 .

[35]  S. Bringezu,et al.  Toward a systemic monitoring of the European bioeconomy: Gaps, needs and the integration of sustainability indicators and targets for global land use , 2017 .

[36]  Annie Levasseur,et al.  Bridging the gap between impact assessment methods and climate science , 2016 .

[37]  J. Rockström,et al.  Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science , 2016 .

[38]  Gregor Wernet,et al.  The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[39]  H. Schütz,et al.  The land footprint of the EU bioeconomy: monitoring tools, gaps and needs. , 2015 .

[40]  Jacopo Giuntoli,et al.  Domestic heating from forest logging residues: environmental risks and benefits , 2015 .

[41]  Stefan Giljum,et al.  Measuring telecouplings in the global land system: A review and comparative evaluation of land footprint accounting methods , 2015 .

[42]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet , 2015, Science.

[43]  E. Hertwich,et al.  CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming , 2011 .

[44]  F. Chapin,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity , 2009 .

[45]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[46]  Sala Serenella,et al.  Indicators and assessment of the environmental impact of EU consumption , 2019 .

[47]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Food consumption and wasted food , 2019, Saving Food.

[48]  Sala Serenella,et al.  Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods , 2018 .

[49]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Bio-Economy Contribution to Circular Economy , 2018 .

[50]  Michael Z. Hauschild,et al.  Better – But is it Good Enough? On the Need to Consider Both Eco-efficiency and Eco-effectiveness to Gauge Industrial Sustainability , 2015 .

[51]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Beyond biofuels: assessing global land use for domestic consumption of biomass: a conceptual and empirical contribution to sustainable management of global resources. , 2012 .