Industrial research institutes' collaboration : a three-way solution to integrating new research skills

Innovation processes in emerging fields of technology frequently utilize scientific knowledge and technical skills from several research areas. Likewise, technological development frequently involves a diverse set of organizations including for example private firms, universities, corporate research labs and public or semi-public research and technology organizations (RTOs). These processes spur the need for both organizational and institutional change and adjustment, e.g. in order to facilitate research and development (R&D) and formation of innovation networks. The main question analyzed in the paper is how RTOs cope with integrating new skills in their competence base in the quest for exploring new emerging science fields and technology applications. The empirical setting consists of Swedish semi-public industrial research institutes active in the fields of pulp & paper technology and electronics, optics & communication technology respectively. The results of the study bring attention to three ways of integrating diverse skills and types of actors in R&D networks. These are: organization of collaborative research in formalized industry-specific R&D programs, purposeful organizational change also including redefinition of categories of core research competence and finally by targeting ‘open’ innovation processes characterized by incorporation of both end-users and skills of neighboring technology areas.

[1]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Localized Learning and Industrial Competitiveness , 1995 .

[2]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[3]  L. Zucker.  Institutional Theories of Organization , 1987 .

[4]  Anders Carlsson.  Natverksentreprenoren: En historia om teknisk forskning och industriellt utvecklingsarbete fran den Malmska utredningen till Styrelsen for teknisk utveckling , 1999 .

[5]  Brigitte Preissl,et al.  Research and technology organizations in the service economy , 2006 .

[6]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Local Nodes in Global Networks: The Geography of Knowledge Flows in Biotechnology Innovation , 2005 .

[7]  Jason Owen-Smith,et al.  From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities , 2003 .

[8]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there) , 2003 .

[9]  Mats Wilhelmsson.  HOW CAN RESEARCH NETWORKS IMPROVE THE INNOVATION PROCESS , 2007 .

[10]  L. Zucker,et al.  Star scientists and institutional transformation: patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[12]  W. Scott.  Institutional carriers: reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences , 2003 .

[13]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Cameron Lawrence,et al.  Institutions and Organizations (2nd ed.) , 2003 .

[15]  R. Friedland.  Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[16]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[17]  Per-Åke Johansson,et al.  Topography and reflectance analysis of paper surfaces using a photometric stereo method , 2000 .

[18]  A. Amin,et al.  Organisational Learning and Governance Through Embedded Practices , 2000 .

[19]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography , 2003 .

[21]  David F. Channell.  Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1999 .

[22]  Raine Hermans,et al.  Value Creation in the Interface of Industry and Academy - A Case Study of Intellectual Capital of Technology Transfer Offices At US Universities , 2008 .

[23]  E. Romanelli,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1992 .

[24]  A. Gillison,et al.  Research Partnerships , 2007 .

[25]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technology and the pursuit of economic growth , 1991 .

[26]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1992 .

[27]  BoschFrans A. J. Van Den,et al.  Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment , 1999 .

[28]  Dominique Foray,et al.  Academic Licensing: a European Study , 2007 .

[29]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  A novel approach to national technological accumulation and absorptive capacity: aggregating Cohen and Levinthal , 2002 .

[30]  T. Dublin,et al.  Research policy , 2021, The Routledge Handbook of Gender and EU Politics.

[31]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[32]  Roberto Mazzoleni,et al.  The Development of Universities and Public Research Institutions: A Historical Overview of its Role in Technological and Economic Catch-up , 2005 .

[33]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[34]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[35]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  From Vulnerable to Venerated: The Institutionalization of Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences , 2007 .

[36]  Siv Lindberg,et al.  Perceptual assessment of simulated print noise with random and periodic structure , 2005, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[37]  George Bugliarello,et al.  The History and Philosophy of Technology , 1982 .

[38]  M. Feldman.  The New Economics Of Innovation, Spillovers And Agglomeration: Areview Of Empirical Studies , 1999 .

[39]  O. Persson,et al.  Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration , 1992 .

[40]  U. Schmoch,et al.  Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields , 1998 .

[41]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[42]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[43]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[44]  K. Pavitt.  Technologies, Products and Organization in the Innovating Firm: What Adam Smith Tells Us and Joseph Schumpeter Doesn't , 1998 .

[45]  Hans Weinberger.  Nätverksentreprenören : en historia om teknisk forskning och industriellt utvecklingsarbete från den Malmska utredningen till Styrelsen för teknisk utveckling , 1997 .

[46]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Co-evolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities , 1999 .

[47]  A. Amin,et al.  Learning and Adaptation in Decentralised Business Networks , 1999 .

[48]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[49]  Patrick Cohendet,et al.  Geographies of Knowledge Formation in Firms , 2005 .

[50]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[51]  Sverker Sörlin.  En ny institutssektor : En analys av industriforskningsinstitutens villkor och framtid ur ett närings- och innovationspolitiskt perspektiv , 2006 .