Trust and temporary virtual teams: alternative explanations and dramaturgical relationships

The paper uses the dramaturgical perspective for conceptualising trust development within temporary virtual teams. The underlying assumption is that temporary teams do not have the luxury of time that, according to the traditional trust theories, enables familiarity among team members and promotes trust development. Yet, in these teams, trust needs to develop quickly and it is important that it lasts throughout the short duration of the project lifecycle. Using the metaphor of a theatre, a dramaturgical perspective on trust relationships is adopted and is used to present actors, co‐actors and audience as all playing a key role in scripting, staging and performing virtual plays. The dramaturgical perspective provides an illustrative approach for uncovering the interactions between key players. As it is argued, these interactions elicit the process of trust development within the temporary setting of virtual teams, constituting a type of trust relationship that is mutually negotiated and jointly constructed. This type of trust is called “situated” and emerges from the scripted, pre‐scripted, co‐scripted, re‐scripted and unscripted computer‐mediated interactions of virtual players. The implications for theory and practice are discussed.

[1]  Thomas Butler,et al.  An institutional perspective on developing and implementing intranet‐ and internet‐based information systems , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[2]  Andrew D. Brown,et al.  Honourable Members and Dishonourable Deeds: Sensemaking, Impression Management and Legitimation in the `Arms to Iraq Affair' , 2000 .

[3]  C. N. Alexander,,et al.  Situated Identities and Social Influence , 1977 .

[4]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[5]  Blake Ives,et al.  Trust and the Unintended Effects of Behavior Control in Virtual Teams , 2003, MIS Q..

[6]  Steven C. Currall,et al.  Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. , 1995 .

[7]  I. Mangham,et al.  Organizations as theatre: A social psychology of dramatic appearances , 1987 .

[8]  Niki Panteli,et al.  Back to Basics: Sharing Goals and Developing Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 2003, Information Systems Perspectives and Challenges in the Context of Globalization.

[9]  William L. Gardner,et al.  Lessons in organizatoinal dramaturgy: The art of impression management , 1992 .

[10]  B. R. Schlenker.  Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations , 1980 .

[11]  N.W. Coppola,et al.  Building trust in virtual teams , 2001, IPCC 2001. Communication Dimensions. Proceedings IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (Cat. No.01CH37271).

[12]  Niki Panteli,et al.  Revisiting the nature of virtual organizations: reflections on mobile communication systems , 2001 .

[13]  Haya Bechar-Israeli,et al.  From "Bonehead" to "cLoNehEAd": Nicknames, Play and Identity on Internet Relay Chat , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Striking a balance between trust and control in a virtual organization: a content analysis of open source software case studies , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[15]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  The Charismatic Relationship: A Dramaturgical Perspective , 1998 .

[16]  Aneil Mishra.  ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSES TO CRISIS: THE CENTRALITY OF TRUST , 1996 .

[17]  R. Romanyshyn,et al.  Technology as symptom and dream , 1989 .

[18]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[19]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[20]  Paul J. Hart,et al.  Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange , 1997 .

[21]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[22]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[23]  Sharon F. Matusik,et al.  The Utilization of Contingent Work, Knowledge Creation, and Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[24]  Sajda Qureshi,et al.  Adaptiveness in Virtual Teams: Organisational Challenges and Research Directions , 2001 .

[25]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[26]  Jon W. Beard.  Impression Management and Information Technology , 1996 .

[27]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Virtual Reality , 1991 .

[28]  I. Mangham,et al.  From Dramaturgy to Theatre as Technology: The Case of Corporate Theatre , 2004 .

[29]  Richard Sotto,et al.  The virtual organisation , 1997 .

[30]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[31]  Niki Panteli,et al.  Discursive articulations of presence in virtual organizing , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[32]  Thomas M. Jones,et al.  Moral Hazards on the Road to the “Virtual” Corporation , 1998, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[33]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Building trust in virtual teams , 2004 .

[34]  Joe Nandhakumar,et al.  Virtual teams and lost proximity : Consequences on trust relationships , 2002 .

[35]  R. Romanyshyn,et al.  Technology as Symptom & Dream , 1989 .

[36]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[37]  Dwight D. Frink,et al.  Accountability, Impression Management, and Goal Setting in the Performance Evaluation Process , 1998 .

[38]  Don Tapscott,et al.  The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence , 2003 .

[39]  Abbe Mowshowitz,et al.  Virtual organization , 1997, CACM.

[40]  J. Cook,et al.  New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non‐fulfilment , 1980 .

[41]  Marjorie Chan,et al.  SOME THEORETICAL PROPOSITIONS PERTAINING TO THE CONTEXT OF TRUST , 1997 .

[42]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[43]  C. Handy.  Trust and the virtual organization , 1999 .

[44]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[45]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[46]  D. Gefen,et al.  E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust , 2000 .

[47]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[48]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology , 1997 .

[49]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships , 1996 .

[50]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[51]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[52]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[53]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development , 2000, DATB.