Usability heuristics evaluation for child e-learning applications

Heuristic evaluation has become widely accepted method of usability evaluation in software development. This paper introduces Heuristic Evaluation for Child E-learning applications (HECE), a comprehensive set of heuristics for child e-learning along with a detailed explanation for the usability experts on how to apply them. These sets of heuristics are based on Nielsen's original ten heuristic developed for software. Nielson heuristics are basically generic, and might not encompass usability attributes specific to children or e-learning. The new HECE set would overcome these shortcomings. The validity and effectiveness of these heuristics were evaluated against two developed e-learning programs designed by ReDSOFT for KG-2 and special need students. The results indicated that HECE identified qualitative similarities and differences with user testing, and that HECE is best suited for evaluating general and child usability. Combined with user testing, HECE offers a new track that can assist in guiding the child e-learning industry to design applications that are both educational and pleasurable for children.

[1]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Usability and learning: Evaluating the potential of educational software , 1996, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Robin Jeffries,et al.  User interface evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques , 1991, CHI.

[3]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Usability and Instructional Design Heuristics for E-Learning Evaluation , 2002 .

[4]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[5]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Usability heuristics for networked multiplayer games , 2009, GROUP.

[6]  Wolmet Barendregt,et al.  A Structured Expert Evaluation Method for the Evaluation of Children's Computer Games , 2005, INTERACT.

[7]  Teresa Roselli,et al.  An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[8]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Improving a human-computer dialogue , 1990, CACM.

[9]  Elina M. I. Koivisto,et al.  Playability heuristics for mobile multi-player games , 2007, DIMEA.

[10]  Jacob P. Somervell,et al.  Usability Heuristics for Large Screen Information Exhibits , 2003, INTERACT.

[11]  Yasemin Afacan,et al.  An interdisciplinary heuristic evaluation method for universal building design. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  Kim Halskov Madsen.  The diversity of usability practices , 1999 .

[13]  Mei Wang,et al.  Evaluating the usability of Web-based learning tools , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[14]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  What Makes Things Fun to Learn? A Study of Intrinsically Motivating Computer Games. , 1981 .

[15]  Sebastiano Bagnara,et al.  Multimedia systems in distance education: effects of usability on learning , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[16]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic Evaluation of Prototypes (individual) , 2022 .

[17]  Luca Botturi,et al.  MiLE : Systematic Usability Evaluation for E-learning Web Applications , 2004 .

[18]  Franca Garzotto,et al.  On the Advantages of a Systematic Inspection for Evaluating Hypermedia Usability , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Empirical development of a heuristic evaluation methodology for shared workspace groupware , 2002, CSCW '02.

[20]  Elizabeth Chang,et al.  Usability Metrics for E-learning , 2003, OTM Workshops.

[21]  Laurie P. Dringus.  An Iterative Usability Evaluation Procedure for Interactive Online Courses , 1995 .

[22]  Franca Garzotto,et al.  SUE inspection: an effective method for systematic usability evaluation of hypermedia , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[23]  Janet Wesson,et al.  The challenge of measuring E-learning quality: some ideas from HCI , 2003, Quality Education @ a Distance.

[24]  Kirsten Risden,et al.  Guidelines for usability testing with children , 1997, INTR.

[25]  Heather Desurvire,et al.  Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games , 2004, CHI EA '04.