Some perspectives on the decision theoretic approach to medical images.

An image often contains information that is not extracted by the human decision maker. This is due to two limitations of the eye-brain system: the existence of a contrast threshold, as with any device that works in the presence of noise (internal or external), and an evolutionary pattern that has not fitted us for viewing noisy scenes, leaving us suboptimal in that regard. Since it is often impossible to overcome these limitations simultaneously--even electronically--multiple displays of the image content must be available to the human viewer, and contrast scale and degree of sharpness/smoothing must be tunable. Our planning must anticipate these requirements, a greater dependence on digital computers for the image manipulation, and the computer's inevitable involvement in the decision process.

[1]  K. Rossmann,et al.  Measurement of the Modulation Transfer Function of Radiographic Systems Containing Fluorescent Screens , 1964, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Edwin C. McCullough,et al.  Image Format and Viewers for Computerized Tomographic Scanners , 1976, Other Conferences.

[3]  C E Metz,et al.  Evaluation of receiver operating characteristic curve data in terms of information theory, with applications in radiography. , 1973, Radiology.

[4]  Henry N. Wagner,et al.  Medical Radioisotope Scanning , 1960 .

[5]  G. C. Higgins,et al.  The Nature and Evaluation of the Sharpness of Photographic Images , 1952 .

[6]  Dennis D. Patton.  Controllable Parameters Of Nuclear Medicine Images , 1977, Other Conferences.

[7]  Frank R. Whitehead.  The D-Log E Curve And Its Relationship To Lesion Contrast And Required Photon Count Densities For Medical Images , 1977, Other Conferences.

[8]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Toward a unified view of radiological imaging systems. Part II: Noisy images. , 1977, Medical physics.

[9]  C E Metz,et al.  Letter: On failure to improve observer performance with scan smoothing: a rebuttal. , 1973, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  P F Sharp,et al.  Effects of 'matched filter' smoothing as measured by receiver operating characteristic curve. , 1976, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Critical Assessment Of Imaging Parameters And Clinical Relevance For Magnification Skeletal Radiography , 1977, Other Conferences.

[12]  R P Kruger,et al.  Hybrid optical-digital radiography-based system for lung disease detection. , 1977, Applied optics.

[13]  R H MORGAN,et al.  THE FREQUENCY RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS OF X-RAY FILMS AND SCREENS. , 1964, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[14]  A. Rose,et al.  Quantum and noise limitations of the visual process. , 1953, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[15]  R. Beck.  A Theory of Radioisotope Scanning Systems , 1964 .

[16]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[17]  M Danos,et al.  Image information content and patient exposure. , 1978, Medical physics.

[18]  C E Metz,et al.  A comparison of optimum detector spatial resolution in nuclear imaging based on statistical theory and on observer performance. , 1978, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Toward a unified view of radiological imaging systems. Part II: Noisy images , 1974 .

[20]  B. S. Askins.  Autoradiographic image intensification: applications in medical radiography. , 1978, Science.

[21]  G. A. Hay,et al.  A model of visual threshold detection. , 1977, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  Peter M. Joseph.  Image Noise And Smoothing In Computed Tomography (CT) Scanners , 1977, Other Conferences.

[23]  W. Logan.  Breast carcinoma : the radiologist's expanded role , 1977 .