OSCE best practice guidelines—applicability for nursing simulations

BackgroundObjective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) have been used for many years within healthcare programmes as a measure of students’ and clinicians’ clinical performance. OSCEs are a form of simulation and are often summative but may be formative. This educational approach requires robust design based on sound pedagogy to assure practice and assessment of holistic nursing care. As part of a project testing seven OSCE best practice guidelines (BPGs) across three sites, the BPGs were applied to an existing simulation activity. The aim of this study was to determine the applicability and value of the OSCE BPGs in an existing formative simulation.MethodsA mixed methods approach was used to address the research question: in what ways do OSCE BPGs align with simulations. The BPGs were aligned and compared with all aspects of an existing simulation activity offered to first-year nursing students at a large city-based university, prior to their first clinical placement in an Australian healthcare setting. Survey questions, comprised of Likert scales and free-text responses, used at other sites were slightly modified for reference to simulation. Students’ opinions about the refined simulation activity were collected via electronic survey immediately following the simulation and from focus groups. Template analysis, using the BPGs as existing or a priori thematic codes, enabled interpretation and illumination of the data from both sources.ResultsFew changes were made to the existing simulation plan and format. Students’ responses from surveys (n = 367) and four focus groups indicated that all seven BPGs were applicable for simulations in guiding their learning, particularly in the affective domain, and assisting their perceived needs in preparing for upcoming clinical practice.DiscussionSimilarities were found in the intent of simulation and OSCEs informed by the BPGs to enable feedback to students about holistic practice across affective, cognitive and psychomotor domains. The similarities in this study are consistent with findings from exploring the applicability of the BPGs for OSCEs in other nursing education settings, contexts, universities and jurisdictions. The BPGs also aligned with other frameworks and standards often used to develop and deliver simulations.ConclusionsFindings from this study provide further evidence of the applicability of the seven OSCE BPGs to inform the development and delivery of, in this context, simulation activities for nurses. The manner in which simulation is offered to large cohorts requires further consideration to meet students’ needs in rehearsing the registered nurse role.

[1]  K. Wotton,et al.  High-Fidelity Simulation Debriefing in Nursing Education: A Literature Review , 2011 .

[2]  M. S. Mahara A perspective on clinical evaluation in nursing education. , 1998, Journal of advanced nursing.

[3]  Martha A Q Curley,et al.  Using high-fidelity simulation to bridge clinical and classroom learning in undergraduate pediatric nursing. , 2013, Nurse education today.

[4]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination for Bachelor of Midwifery students' preparation for practice. , 2014, Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives.

[5]  Heather Baid The objective structured clinical examination within intensive care nursing education. , 2011, Nursing in critical care.

[6]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Best Practice Guidelines for use of OSCEs: Maximising value for student learning. , 2011, Nurse education today.

[7]  Diane K. Brown,et al.  Comparison of Simulation Debriefing Methods , 2012 .

[8]  David M Gaba,et al.  The future vision of simulation in health care , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[9]  D. Gaba The future vision of simulation in health care , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[10]  M. Kelly,et al.  Empowering the registered nurses of tomorrow: students' perspectives of a simulation experience for recognising and managing a deteriorating patient. , 2014, Nurse education today.

[11]  Kristina Thomas Dreifuerst,et al.  Using debriefing for meaningful learning to foster development of clinical reasoning in simulation. , 2012, The Journal of nursing education.

[12]  M. Kelly Investigating the use of simulations in enhancing clinical judgement of students to practice as registered nurses , 2014 .

[13]  M. Mitchell,et al.  The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): optimising its value in the undergraduate nursing curriculum. , 2009, Nurse education today.

[14]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 2008 .

[15]  R. Harden,et al.  Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). , 1979, Medical education.

[16]  L. Taft,et al.  Preparing for practice: students' reflections on their final clinical experience. , 2005, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[17]  M. Mitchell,et al.  The value of best-practice guidelines for OSCEs in a postgraduate program in an Australian remote area setting. , 2014, Rural and remote health.

[18]  Bridget C. O’Brien,et al.  Preparing Medical Students for Clerkships: A Descriptive Analysis of Transition Courses , 2008, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[19]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Application of best practice guidelines for OSCEs-An Australian evaluation of their feasibility and value. , 2015, Nurse education today.

[20]  Pamela R. Jeffries,et al.  Simulation in nursing education : from conceptualization to evaluation , 2007 .

[21]  H. Rushforth,et al.  Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): review of literature and implications for nursing education. , 2007, Nurse education today.

[22]  P. Hager,et al.  Informal Learning: Relevance and Application to Health Care Simulation , 2015 .

[23]  Ara Darzi,et al.  Formative assessment of procedural skills: students’ responses to the Objective Structured Clinical Examination and the Integrated Performance Procedural Instrument , 2011 .

[24]  Carol Botwinski,et al.  Developing a successful nursing Objective Structured Clinical Examination. , 2010, The Journal of nursing education.

[25]  M. Kelly,et al.  Providing simulation experiences for large cohorts of 1st year nursing students: evaluating quality and impact. , 2012, Collegian.

[26]  R. Harden,et al.  What is an OSCE? , 1988, Medical teacher.

[27]  M. Ms A perspective on clinical evaluation in nursing education , 1998 .

[28]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[29]  Tracy Levett-Jones,et al.  Quality indicators for the design and implementation of simulation experiences: a Delphi study. , 2013, Nurse education today.

[30]  N. King,et al.  The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research , 2014, Qualitative research in psychology.

[31]  B. Hodges Validity and the OSCE , 2003, Medical Teacher.

[32]  Selma M.H,et al.  UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY , 2006 .

[33]  Abeer Selim,et al.  Using Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in undergraduate psychiatric nursing education: is it reliable and valid? , 2012, Nurse education today.

[34]  M. Kelly,et al.  Delivering a large cohort simulation - beginning nursing students’ experience: A pre-post survey , 2013 .