Ramp Metering and the Capacity of Active Freeway Bottlenecks

The objective of this study is to determine whether ramp meters increase the capacity of active freeway bottlenecks, and if they do, how. The traffic flow characteristics at twenty-seven active bottlenecks in the Twin Cities have been studied for seven weeks without ramp metering and seven weeks with ramp metering. A series of hypotheses regarding the relationships between ramp metering and the capacity of active bottlenecks are developed and tested against empirical traffic data. It is found that meters increase the bottleneck capacity by postponing and sometimes eliminating bottleneck activations (a 73% increase in the duration of the pre-queue transition period), accommodating higher (2%) flows during the pre-queue transition period, and increasing queue discharge flow rates after breakdown (3%). The two-capacity hypothesis about flow drops after breakdown was also examined and results strongly suggest the percentage flow drops at various bottlenecks follow a normal distribution (mean 5.5%, standard deviation 2.3%). The implications of these findings on the design of efficient ramp control strategies are discussed, as well as future research directions.

[1]  MASAO KUWAHAM,et al.  Capacity of Sags and Tunnels on Japanese Motorways , 1992 .

[2]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Fundamentals of Transportation and Traffic Operations , 1997 .

[3]  Michael J. Cassidy.  Freeway On-Ramp Metering, Delay Savings, and Diverge Bottleneck , 2003 .

[4]  Fred L. Hall,et al.  FREEWAY CAPACITY DROP AND THE DEFINITION OF CAPACITY , 1991 .

[5]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[6]  Adolf D May,et al.  TRAFFIC DETECTOR ERRORS AND DIAGNOSTICS , 1987 .

[7]  Sam Yagar,et al.  Exploration of the Breakdown Phenomenon in Freeway Traffic , 1998 .

[8]  V F Hurdle,et al.  FREEWAY CAPACITY: DEFINITION AND MEASUREMENT ISSUES , 1991 .

[9]  David M Levinson,et al.  Estimation of the Demand Responses to Ramp Metering , 2002 .

[10]  James H Banks,et al.  TWO-CAPACITY PHENOMENON AT FREEWAY BOTTLENECKS: A BASIS FOR RAMP METERING? , 1991 .

[11]  M. Cassidy,et al.  Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks , 1999 .

[12]  David M Levinson,et al.  Ramp Metering and Freeway Bottleneck Capacity , 2009 .

[13]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  EVALUATION OF SPEED ESTIMATES MADE WITH SINGLE-DETECTOR DATA FROM FREEWAY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS , 1989 .

[14]  Nancy L. Nihan,et al.  DETECTING ERRONEOUS LOOP DETECTOR DATA IN A FREEWAY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM , 1990 .

[15]  Adolf D May.  Experimentation with Manual and Automatic Ramp Control , 1965 .

[16]  Sam Yagar,et al.  Breakdown-Related Capacity for Freeway with Ramp Metering , 2001 .

[17]  Javrns,et al.  Flow Processes at a Freeway Bottleneck , 2022 .

[18]  Michael J. Cassidy,et al.  Study of Traffic at a Freeway Merge and Roles for Ramp Metering , 2002 .

[19]  Leonard Newman,et al.  FREEWAY RAMP CONTROL--WHAT IT CAN AND CANNOT DO , 1969 .

[20]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  COORDINATED AND INTEGRATED CONTROL OF MOTORWAY NETWORKS VIA NON-LINEAR OPTIMAL CONTROL , 2002 .

[21]  Michael J. Cassidy,et al.  METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING DYNAMICS OF FREEWAY TRAFFIC FLOW , 1995 .

[22]  J. Banks.  THE TWO-CAPACITY PHENOMENON: SOME THEORETICAL ISSUES , 1991 .