A combination of QFD and imprecise DEA with enhanced Russell graph measure: A case study in healthcare

Quality function deployment (QFD) is a proven tool for process and product development, which translates the voice of customer (VoC) into engineering characteristics (EC), and prioritizes the ECs, in terms of customer's requirements. Traditionally, QFD rates the design requirements (DRs) with respect to customer needs, and aggregates the ratings to get relative importance scores of DRs. An increasing number of studies stress on the need to incorporate additional factors, such as cost and environmental impact, while calculating the relative importance of DRs. However, there is a paucity of methodologies for deriving the relative importance of DRs when several additional factors are considered. Ramanathan and Yunfeng [43] proved that the relative importance values computed by data envelopment analysis (DEA) coincide with traditional QFD calculations when only the ratings of DRs with respect to customer needs are considered, and only one additional factor, namely cost, is considered. Also, Kamvysi et al. [27] discussed the combination of QFD with analytic hierarchy process–analytic network process (AHP–ANP) and DEAHP–DEANP methodologies to prioritize selection criteria in a service context. The objective of this paper is to propose a QFD–imprecise enhanced Russell graph measure (QFD–IERGM) for incorporating the criteria such as cost of services and implementation easiness in QFD. Proposed model is applied in an Iranian hospital.

[1]  Gary S. Wasserman,et al.  ON HOW TO PRIORITIZE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS DURING THE QFD PLANNING PROCESS , 1993 .

[2]  W. Cooper,et al.  RAM: A Range Adjusted Measure of Inefficiency for Use with Additive Models, and Relations to Other Models and Measures in DEA , 1999 .

[3]  Jürgen Bode,et al.  Cost engineering with quality function deployment , 1998 .

[4]  Gholam Reza Jahanshahloo,et al.  INEFFICIENCY EVALUATION WITH AN ADDITIVE DEA MODEL UNDER IMPRECISE DATA, AN APPLICATION ON IAUK* DEPARTMENTS , 2007 .

[5]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Interval efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis with imprecise data , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[7]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Imprecise data envelopment analysis (IDEA): A review and improvement with an application , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  W. Cooper,et al.  Idea and Ar-Idea: Models for Dealing with Imprecise Data in Dea , 1999 .

[9]  Yahia Zare Mehrjerdi Applications and extensions of quality function deployment , 2010 .

[10]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[11]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  Incorporating cost and environmental factors in quality function deployment using data envelopment analysis , 2009 .

[12]  Jack B. Revelle,et al.  The QFD handbook , 1998 .

[13]  Andreas Andronikidis,et al.  Integrating DEAHP and DEANP into the quality function deployment , 2010 .

[14]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Developing a new data envelopment analysis methodology for supplier selection in the presence of both undesirable outputs and imprecise data , 2010 .

[15]  Boaz Golany,et al.  An Interactive MOLP Procedure for the Extension of DEA to Effectiveness Analysis , 1988 .

[16]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  A new approach to quality function deployment planning with financial consideration , 2002, Comput. Oper. Res..

[17]  C. K. Kwong,et al.  A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment , 2002, J. Intell. Manuf..

[18]  Joe Zhu Data Envelopment Analysis with Preference Structure , 1996 .

[19]  N. Tang,et al.  A study of patients' expectations and satisfaction in Singapore hospitals. , 2000, International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services.

[20]  Fariborz Y. Partovi,et al.  An analytic model for locating facilities strategically , 2006 .

[21]  Jd Hans van der Bij,et al.  Quality function deployment in healthcare. Methods for meeting customer requirements in redesign and renewal , 2002 .

[22]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses , 1994 .

[23]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Design and marketing of new products , 1980 .

[24]  Y. Zhang,et al.  Green QFD-II: A life cycle approach for environmentally conscious manufacturing by integrating LCA and LCC into QFD matrices , 1999 .

[25]  Reza Farzipoor Saen Media selection in the presence of flexible factors and imprecise data , 2011, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[26]  K. S. Park,et al.  Efficiency bounds and efficiency classifications in DEA with imprecise data , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[27]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1962 .

[28]  Louis Cohen,et al.  Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You , 1995 .

[29]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Efficiency aggregation with enhanced Russell measures in data envelopment analysis , 2007 .

[30]  Kwang-Jae Kim,et al.  Determination of an Optimal Set of Design Requirements Using House of Quality , 1998 .

[31]  C K Kwong,et al.  Determining the Importance Weights for the Customer Requirements in QFD Using a Fuzzy AHP with an Extent Analysis Approach , 2003 .

[32]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  Computational strategy for Russell measure in DEA: Second-order cone programming , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Min Xie,et al.  Dynamic Programming for QFD Optimization , 2005 .

[35]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Supplier selection by the new AR-IDEA model , 2008 .

[36]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Developing a Chance-Constrained Free Disposable Hull Model for Selecting Third-Party Reverse Logistics Providers , 2013, Int. J. Oper. Res. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Determining relative efficiency of slightly non-homogeneous decision making units by data envelopment analysis: a case study in IROST , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[38]  Wan Edura Wan Rashid,et al.  Service quality in health care setting. , 2009, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[39]  B. M. Moores Radiation safety management in health care – The application of Quality Function Deployment , 2006 .

[40]  Eleonora Bottani,et al.  Strategic management of logistics service: A fuzzy QFD approach , 2006 .

[41]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A mathematical model for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers , 2009 .

[42]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[43]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Measuring the technical efficiency of production , 1978 .

[45]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Supplier selection by the pair of nondiscretionary factors-imprecise data envelopment analysis models , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[46]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality Function Deployment: A Comprehensive Review of Its Concepts and Methods , 2002 .

[47]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1980 .

[48]  Nelson K.H. Tang,et al.  The development of a model for total quality healthcare , 2000 .

[49]  Hefin Rowlands,et al.  Methods and techniques to help quality function deployment (QFD) , 2000 .

[50]  E M Einspruch,et al.  Quality function deployment: application to rehabilitation services. , 1996, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[51]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Centralized resource allocation for enhanced Russell models , 2010, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[52]  Reza Farzipoor Saen International market selection using advanced data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[53]  M. Lu,et al.  Integrating QFD, AHP and Benchmarking in Strategic Marketing , 1994 .

[54]  P. Sagar Midha,et al.  A QFD based methodology for evaluating a company's PDM requirements for collaborative product development , 2001, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[55]  Andreas Herrmann,et al.  An empirical study of quality function deployment on company performance , 2006 .

[56]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Interval efficiency assessment using data envelopment analysis , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[57]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A decision model for ranking suppliers in the presence of cardinal and ordinal data, weight restrictions, and nondiscretionary factors , 2009, Ann. Oper. Res..

[58]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  An application of data envelopment analysis in telephone offices evaluation with partial data , 1999, Comput. Oper. Res..