Morphing Banner Advertising

textabstractResearchers and practitioners devote substantial effort to targeting banner advertisements to consumers, but they focus less effort on how to communicate with consumers once targeted. Morphing enables a website to learn, automatically and near optimally, which banner advertisements to serve to consumers to maximize click-through rates, brand consideration, and purchase likelihood. Banners are matched to consumers based on posterior probabilities of latent segment membership, which are identified from consumers' clickstreams. This paper describes the first large-sample random-assignment field test of banner morphing-more than 100,000 consumers viewed more than 450,000 banners on CNET.com. On relevant Web pages, CNET's clickthrough rates almost doubled relative to control banners. We supplement the CNET field test with an experiment on an automotive information-and-recommendation website. The automotive experiment replaces automated learning with a longitudinal design that implements morph-to-segment matching. Banners matched to cognitive styles, as well as the stage of the consumer's buying process and body-type preference, significantly increase click-through rates, brand consideration, and purchase likelihood relative to a control. The CNET field test and automotive experiment demonstrate that matching banners to cognitive-style segments is feasible and provides significant benefits above and beyond traditional targeting. Improved banner effectiveness has strategic implications for allocations of budgets among media.

[1]  J. Gittins Bandit processes and dynamic allocation indices , 1979 .

[2]  Sriram Kalyanaraman,et al.  AROUSAL, MEMORY, AND IMPRESSION-FORMATION EFFECTS OF ANIMATION SPEED IN WEB ADVERTISING , 2004 .

[3]  Micael Dahlen Banner Advertisements through a New Lens , 2001, Journal of Advertising Research.

[4]  Thomas Novak,et al.  The Fit of Thinking Style and Situation: New Measures of Situation-Specific Experiential and Rational Cognition , 2007 .

[5]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[6]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Website Morphing , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[7]  J. M. Villas-Boas,et al.  The Targeting of Advertising , 2005 .

[8]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[9]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[10]  S. Chaiken Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[11]  Steven L. Scott,et al.  A modern Bayesian look at the multi-armed bandit , 2010 .

[12]  Shirley S. Fung,et al.  Website Morphing 2 . 0 : Technical and Implementation Advances Combined with the First Field Experiment of Website Morphing , 2011 .

[13]  D. Hoffman,et al.  The Fit of Thinking Style and Situation: New Measures of Situation-Specific Experiential and Rational Cognition , 2007 .

[14]  J. Zaichkowsky Conceptualizing Involvement , 1986 .

[15]  A. Stanaland,et al.  The impact of surfer/seeker mode on the effectiveness of website characteristics , 2010 .

[16]  Vikram Krishnamurthy,et al.  Finite dimensional algorithms for the hidden Markov model multi-armed bandit problem , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[17]  Wei Chu,et al.  A case study of behavior-driven conjoint analysis on Yahoo!: front page today module , 2009, KDD.

[18]  Richard Gatarski,et al.  Breed better banners: Design automation through on-line interaction , 2002 .

[19]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Website Morphing 2.0: Switching Costs, Partial Exposure, Random Exit, and When to Morph , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  The good, the bad, and the random: an eye-tracking study of ad quality in web search , 2010, SIGIR.

[21]  John F. Canny,et al.  Large-scale behavioral targeting , 2009, KDD.

[22]  D. Kenny,et al.  Contextual marketing--the real business of the Internet. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[23]  Hairong Li,et al.  Cognitive Impact of Banner Ad Characteristics: An Experimental Study , 1999 .

[24]  John R. Hauser,et al.  “Listening In” to Find and Explore New Combinations of Customer Needs , 2004 .