Life history of a topic in an online discussion: a complex systems theory perspective on how one message attracts class members to create meaning collaboratively

Complex adaptive systems theory served as a framework for this qualitative study exploring the process of how meaning emerges from the collective interactions of individuals in a synchronous online discussion through their shared words about a topic. In an effort to bridge levels of analysis from the individual to the small group to the community, we analyzed how a group of students introduced, sustained, and eventually let go of one topic while participating in a classroom discussion that took place in a CSCL environment. Our purpose was to examine a single posted message’s influence not only through the responses it garnered, but also by how individuals reacted to it intellectually. Participants were eight students and their teacher in a graduate-level seminar. Data sources included the online discussion’s final transcript, screen-captured recordings of each participant’s computer screen, video recordings of participants’ actions, and observation notes. Our analyses revealed three key understandings: (a) the interdependencies of process and content are manifestations of the complex development of co-created understandings in computer-supported discussions, (b) private individual processes and particular meanings co-mingle in a social space to create publicly shared experiences, and (c) the importance of attending to the content was shown in the details of a topic’s incipience, its developing “mid-life,” and how factors conspired to its end. These findings help illustrate how co-created meaning-making experiences emerge in a system through interactions among individual agents, suggesting ways instructors may work to foster student learning in CSCL contexts.

[1]  Vincenza Tudini,et al.  Extending Prior Posts in Dyadic Online Text Chat , 2015 .

[2]  David Reinking,et al.  Me and My Hypertext:) A Multiple Digression Analysis of Technology and Literacy (sic). , 1997 .

[3]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Learning across levels , 2013, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[4]  Julie Coiro,et al.  Exploring the Online Reading Comprehension Strategies Used by Sixth-Grade Skilled Readers to Search for and Locate Information on the Internet. , 2007 .

[5]  F. Erickson Discourse, learning, and schooling: Going for the zone: the social and cognitive ecology of teacher–student interaction in classroom conversations , 1996 .

[6]  Maureen P. Boyd,et al.  Dialogic Teaching and Dialogic Stance: Moving beyond Interactional Form , 2015 .

[7]  Manu Kapur,et al.  Conceptualizing Debates in Learning and Educational Research: Toward a Complex Systems Conceptual Framework of Learning , 2016 .

[8]  Julie R. Arseneau,et al.  Challenge and Promise , 2006 .

[9]  Mieke Brekelmans,et al.  Real-time teacher-student interactions : a dynamic systems approach , 2014 .

[10]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[11]  Bertrand Schneider,et al.  Toward collaboration sensing , 2014, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[12]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  Explaining authors’ contribution to pivotal artifacts during mass collaboration in the Wikipedia’s knowledge base , 2013, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[13]  Sarah Michaels,et al.  Discourse, learning, and schooling: Shifting participant frameworks: orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion , 1996 .

[14]  Michael J. Hogan,et al.  Investigating the effects of prompts on argumentation style, consensus and perceived efficacy in collaborative learning , 2015, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[15]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  A Model of Collaborative Knowledge Building , 2006 .

[16]  Charles S. Carver,et al.  Control Processes and Self-Organization as Complementary Principles Underlying Behavior , 2002 .

[17]  S. Michaels,et al.  When Is Dialogue ‘Dialogic’? , 2007, Human Development.

[18]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Emergence, flexibility, and stabilization of language in a physics classroom , 2003 .

[19]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  On Lying and Being Lied To: A Linguistic Analysis of Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2007 .

[20]  Manu Kapur,et al.  Temporality matters: Advancing a method for analyzing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[21]  Eric J. Paulson Viewing eye movements during reading through the lens of chaos theory: How reading is like the weather , 2005 .

[22]  J. Eccles,et al.  Motivation in Education , 2012, The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation.

[23]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  Learning and Collective Knowledge Construction With Social Media: A Process-Oriented Perspective , 2015, Educational psychologist.

[24]  Jason Ranker Designing Meaning with Multiple Media Sources: A Case Study of an Eight-Year-Old Student’s Writing Processes , 2007, Research in the Teaching of English.

[25]  David Byrne,et al.  Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences , 2022 .

[26]  Peter Op 't Eynde,et al.  Focusing on the Complexity of Emotion Issues in Academic Learning: A Dynamical Component Systems Approach , 2006 .

[27]  D. Stamovlasis,et al.  Introduction to Education as a Complex Dynamical System , 2016 .

[28]  L. S. Schulman Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching , 1986 .

[29]  Dimitrios Stamovlasis,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamical Interaction Patterns in Collaborative Groups: Discourse Analysis with Orbital Decomposition , 2016 .

[30]  Manu Kapur,et al.  Sensitivities to early exchange in synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) groups , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[32]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Attending to others’ posts in asynchronous discussions: Learners’ online “listening” and its relationship to speaking , 2014, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[33]  Glynda Hull,et al.  Crafting an Agentive Self: Case Studies of Digital Storytelling. , 2006 .

[34]  Rory Remer,et al.  An Introduction to Chaos Theory for Psychodramatists , 2005 .

[35]  D. Larsen-Freeman Chaos/Complexity Science and Second Language Acquisition , 1997 .

[36]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  The Snowball Phenomenon: Spread of Ways of Talking and Ways of Thinking Across Groups of Children , 2001 .

[37]  Jessica Vitak,et al.  Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research , 2017, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[38]  Byeong-Young Cho,et al.  Adolescents' Constructively Responsive Reading Strategy Use in a Critical Internet Reading Task. , 2013 .

[39]  K. Gergen,et al.  Social Epistemology and the Pragmatics of Assessment , 2014, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[40]  R. Galatzer-Levy,et al.  Finding Your Way Through Chaos, Fractals, and Other Exotic Mathematical Objects: a Guide for the Perplexed , 2009, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[41]  J. W. Atkinson Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. , 1957, Psychological review.

[42]  E. Kincanon,et al.  Chaotic analysis in psychology and psychoanalysis. , 1995, The Journal of psychology.

[43]  Yangjoo Park,et al.  Being polite while fulfilling different discourse functions in online classroom discussions , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[44]  L. Phan,et al.  Group Chaos Theory: A Metaphor and Model for Group Work , 2005 .

[45]  L. Ludlow,et al.  The Challenge and Promise of Complexity Theory for Teacher Education Research , 2014, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[46]  Nancy Law,et al.  The core features of CSCL: Social situation, collaborative knowledge processes and their design , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[47]  Srikant Sarangi,et al.  Language Acquisition and Language Socialization: Ecological Perspectives , 2002 .

[48]  Michelle E. Jordan,et al.  Complementary lenses: Using theories of situativity and complexity to understand collaborative learning as systems-level social activity , 2016 .

[49]  U. Wilensky,et al.  Complex Systems in Education: Scientific and Educational Importance and Implications for the Learning Sciences , 2006 .

[50]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  A framework for conceptualizing, representing, and analyzing distributed interaction , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[51]  U. Cress,et al.  How Structure Shapes Dynamics: Knowledge Development in Wikipedia - A Network Multilevel Modeling Approach , 2014, PloS one.

[52]  Jane S. Vogler,et al.  A Microgenetic Analysis of Classroom Discussion Practices , 2013 .

[53]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  The Importance of Harmony: An Ecological Metaphor for Writing Research , 2008, College Composition & Communication.

[54]  Peter Reimann,et al.  Time is precious: Variable- and event-centred approaches to process analysis in CSCL research , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..