Cyclic performance of extended end-plate connections equipped with shape memory alloy bolts

Abstract Shape memory alloys (SMAs) are nowadays promising candidates for seismic engineering applications because of their ability to undergo reversible deformations and to dissipate energy when subjected to cyclic loading. This paper presents an experimental study of the cyclic performance of extended end-plate connections connected using SMA bolts instead of normal high strength bolts in the connections. The basic concept is to concentrate the earthquake-induced deformation into the connection, such that a ‘superelastic’ hinge can be formed via the elongation of the SMA bolts. Eight full-scale tests were conducted including seven extended end-plate connections with SMA bolts and one conventional extended end-plate connection with normal high strength bolts. The SMA connection specimens were shown to have excellent recentring abilities and moderate energy dissipation capability with an equivalent viscous damping up to 17.5%. The stiffness and strength of these connections mainly fell into the semi-rigid and partial-strength categories, respectively. The ductility, which was governed by SMA bolt rupture, was found to be dependent on the net threaded-to-shank area ratio of the bolts, where a lower ratio led to earlier bolt fracture over the net threaded cross-section. On the other hand, the conventional extended end-plate connection with High Strength bolts was shown to have good energy dissipation capability and ductility but with considerable permanent deformation. To enable a further understanding of the SMA connections, preliminary numerical models were established and validated by the test results. Based on the results of the tests and the numerical investigations, preliminary design considerations for such connections are given.

[1]  Ali Abolmaali,et al.  Hysteresis behavior of t-stub connections with superelastic shape memory fasteners , 2006 .

[2]  C Lexcellent,et al.  Pseudoelastic behaviour of shape memory alloy beams under pure bending: experiments and modelling , 2002 .

[3]  Bradley W. Penar,et al.  Recentering Beam-Column Connections Using Shape Memory Alloys , 2005 .

[4]  Bozidar Stojadinovic,et al.  Parametric Tests on Unreinforced Steel Moment Connections , 2000 .

[5]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic Performance Assessment of Steel Frames with Shape Memory Alloy Connections. Part I — Analysis and Seismic Demands , 2010 .

[6]  Luís Simões da Silva,et al.  Design of Steel Structures: Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings , 2010 .

[7]  Ulf Wickström,et al.  Comments on calculation of temperature in fire-exposed bare steel structures in prEN 1993-1-2: Eurocode 3—design of steel structures—Part 1–2: general rules—structural fire design , 2005 .

[8]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Design, analysis and application of innovative composite PR connections between steel beams and CFT columns , 2011 .

[9]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Experimental results of a NiTi shape memory alloy (SMA)-based recentering beam-column connection , 2011 .

[10]  Ahmed Ghobarah,et al.  Behaviour of extended end-plate connections under cyclic loading , 1990 .

[11]  Ferdinando Auricchio,et al.  Shape-memory alloys: macromodelling and numerical simulations of the superelastic behavior , 1997 .

[12]  Charles W. Roeder Connection Performance for Seismic Design of Steel Moment Frames , 2002 .

[13]  John C. Wilson,et al.  Shape Memory Alloys for Seismic Response Modification: A State-of-the-Art Review , 2005 .

[14]  Chongdu Cho,et al.  Feasibility study on a self-centering beam-to-column connection by using the superelastic behavior of SMAs , 2007 .

[15]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Structural Engineering with NiTi . II: Mechanical Behavior and Scaling , 2007 .

[16]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS IN SEISMIC RESISTANT DESIGN AND RETROFIT: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THEIR POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS , 2004 .

[17]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[18]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Posttensioned Energy Dissipating Connections for Moment-Resisting Steel Frames , 2002 .

[19]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Structural engineering with niti. I Basic materials characterization , 2007 .

[20]  Richard Sause,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Earthquake Resistant Posttensioned Steel Connections , 2002 .

[21]  Gangbing Song,et al.  Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures , 2006 .

[22]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic Performance Assessment of Steel Frames with Shape Memory Alloy Connections, Part II – Probabilistic Seismic Demand Assessment , 2010 .

[23]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Steel Beam-Column Connections using Shape Memory Alloys , 2004 .

[24]  Egor P. Popov,et al.  Cyclic performance of steel beam-column moment joints , 1995 .

[25]  Thomas M. Murray,et al.  Behavior of Extended End-Plate Moment Connections Subject to Cyclic Loading , 2002 .

[26]  Chongdu Cho,et al.  A numerical study on bolted end-plate connection using shape memory alloys , 2008 .

[27]  Arata Masuda,et al.  An overview of vibration and seismic applications of NiTi shape memory alloy , 2002 .

[28]  Yong Liu,et al.  Effect of annealing on the transformation behavior and superelasticity of NiTi shape memory alloy , 2001 .

[29]  D. Lagoudas Shape memory alloys : modeling and engineering applications , 2008 .