Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions

Abstract This paper examines early syntactic development from a usage-based perspective, using transcripts of the spontaneous speech of two Englishspeaking children recorded at relatively dense intervals at ages 2;0 and 3;0. We focus primarily on the children’s question constructions, in an effort to determine (i) what kinds of units they initially extract from the input (their size and degree of specificity / abstractness); (ii) what operations they must perform in order to construct novel utterances using these units; and (iii) how the units and the operations change between the ages of two and three. In contrast to nativist theories of language development which suggest that children are working with abstract syntactic categories from an early point in development, we suggest that the data are better accounted for by the proposal that children begin with lexically specific phrases and gradually build up a repertoire of increasingly abstract constructions.

[1]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Early syntactic creativity: a usage-based approach. , 2003, Journal of child language.

[2]  R. Langacker Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites , 1987 .

[3]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[4]  R. Brown,et al.  A First Language , 1973 .

[5]  J. Mandler How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. , 1992, Psychological review.

[6]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[7]  A. Goldberg Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[8]  Ewa Dabrowska,et al.  From formula to schema: The acquisition of English questions , 2001 .

[9]  Peter W. Culicover,et al.  Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases, Syntactic Theory, and Language Acquisition , 1999 .

[10]  J. Pine,et al.  Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[11]  William Croft,et al.  Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective , 2001 .

[12]  Ann M. Peters,et al.  The Units of Language Acquisition , 1983 .

[13]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech , 2003, Journal of Child Language.

[14]  Brian Richards,et al.  Language Development and Individual Differences: A Study of Auxiliary Verb Learning , 1990 .

[15]  M. Tomasello Do young children have adult syntactic competence? , 2000, Cognition.

[16]  M. Tomasello First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development , 1994 .

[17]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  The Architecture of the Language Faculty , 1996 .

[18]  K. Stromswold Learnability and the acquisition of auxiliaries , 1990 .

[19]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax: The Nature of Early Child Grammars of English , 1990 .

[20]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: the reduction of don't in English , 1999 .

[21]  B. MacWhinney The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[22]  Richard Hudson,et al.  Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1. Theoretical prerequisites , 1990 .

[23]  G. A. Miller The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. , 1956, Psychological review.

[24]  J. Pine,et al.  Comparing different models of the development of the English verb category , 1998 .

[25]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Differential productivity in young children's use of nouns and verbs , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[26]  J. Hill,et al.  Combining two-term relations: evidence in support of flat structure , 1984, Journal of Child Language.