SelEQ: An advanced ground motion record selection and scaling framework

Abstract The consensual agreement that ground motion record selection plays an important role in the non-linear dynamic structural response has contributed to numerous research studies seeking the definition of accurate ground motion record selection techniques. However, most of the available tools only allow for record selection based on spectral compatibility between the mean response spectrum of a record suite and a target response spectrum. This paper presents SelEQ, a fully integrated framework that implements state-of-the art procedures for ground motion record selection and scaling. In addition to typical record selection procedures, SelEQ allows obtaining the Conditional Mean Spectrum (CMS) for the European territory, the latter making use of the open source platform OpenQuake and the recently proposed SHARE seismic hazard model. This important feature allows state-of-the-art record selection for probabilistic-based assessment and risk analysis. SelEQ incorporates a number of procedures available in the literature that facilitate preliminary record selection (e.g. disaggregation for a specific site) and that allow advanced selection criteria (e.g. control of mismatch of individual ground motion records). The framework makes use of the Adaptive Harmony Search meta-heuristic optimization algorithm in order to significantly minimize computational cost and analysis time, whilst still meeting the imposed selection constraints. Application examples of the framework indicate that it can accurately select suites of ground motion records for code-based and probabilistic-based seismic assessment.

[1]  J. Baker,et al.  Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection , 2006 .

[2]  G. Ghodrati Amiri,et al.  Generation of Near‐Field Artificial Ground Motions Compatible with Median‐Predicted Spectra Using PSO‐Based Neural Network and Wavelet Analysis , 2012, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[3]  O. Hasançebi,et al.  Bat inspired algorithm for discrete size optimization of steel frames , 2014, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[4]  Kasım Armağan Korkmaz,et al.  Selecting and scaling real ground motion records using harmony search algorithm , 2011 .

[5]  Giuseppe Maddaloni,et al.  A Note on Selection of Time-Histories for Seismic Analysis of Bridges in Eurocode 8 , 2009 .

[6]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  Selection and Scaling of Ground Motion Time Histories for Structural Design Using Genetic Algorithms , 2004 .

[7]  Sinan Akkar,et al.  Evaluation of a recently proposed record selection and scaling procedure for low‐rise to mid‐rise reinforced concrete buildings and its use for probabilistic risk assessment studies , 2014 .

[8]  J. Fonseca,et al.  Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Assessment for Portugal , 2007 .

[9]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  THE USE OF REAL EARTHQUAKE ACCELEROGRAMS AS INPUT TO DYNAMIC ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[10]  Mehmet Polat Saka,et al.  Design optimization of real world steel space frames using artificial bee colony algorithm with Levy flight distribution , 2016, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[11]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Conditional Mean Spectrum: Tool for Ground-Motion Selection , 2011 .

[12]  J. Bommer,et al.  Empirical Equations for the Prediction of PGA, PGV, and Spectral Accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East , 2010 .

[13]  J. Baker,et al.  Statistical Tests of the Joint Distribution of Spectral Acceleration Values , 2008 .

[14]  O. Hasançebi,et al.  Upper bound strategy for metaheuristic based design optimization of steel frames , 2013, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[15]  I. Iervolino,et al.  Eurocode 8 Compliant Real Record Sets for Seismic Analysis of Structures , 2008 .

[16]  Nick Gregor,et al.  NGA Project Strong-Motion Database , 2008 .

[17]  Roberto Paolucci,et al.  Overview of the Italian strong motion database ITACA 1.0 , 2010 .

[18]  W. Silva,et al.  NGA-West2 Database , 2014 .

[19]  Luís Augusto Ferreira Rodrigues de Macedo Performance-Based Seismic Design and Assessment of Steel Moment Frame Buildings , 2018 .

[20]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Seismic risk assessment for mainland Portugal , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[21]  J. Baker,et al.  A vector‐valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon , 2005 .

[22]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Which Spectral Acceleration are you Using? , 2006 .

[23]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design , 2002 .

[24]  A. Sextos,et al.  EC8-based earthquake record selection procedure evaluation: Validation study based on observed damage of an irregular R/C building , 2011 .

[25]  José Miguel Castro,et al.  Seismic design procedure for cold-formed steel sheathed shear wall frames: Proposal and evaluation , 2017 .

[26]  M. P. Saka,et al.  Adaptive Harmony Search Method for Structural Optimization , 2010 .

[27]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  A Computationally Efficient Ground-Motion Selection Algorithm for Matching a Target Response Spectrum Mean and Variance , 2011 .

[28]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Current empirical ground-motion prediction equations for Europe and their application to Eurocode 8 , 2010 .

[29]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Earthquakes, Records, and Nonlinear Responses , 1998 .

[30]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Earthquake Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America , 2006 .

[31]  Anastasios G. Sextos,et al.  ISSARS: An integrated software environment for structure-specific earthquake ground motion selection , 2013, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[32]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  On the Use of Design Spectrum Compatible Time Histories , 1995 .

[33]  Lucia Luzi,et al.  ITACA (ITalian ACcelerometric Archive): A Web Portal for the Dissemination of Italian Strong-motion Data , 2008 .

[34]  Roberto Paolucci,et al.  Ground Motion Record Selection Based on Broadband Spectral Compatibility , 2014 .

[35]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  A survey of non-gradient optimization methods in structural engineering , 2013, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[36]  M. S. Jaafar,et al.  Optimization of Earthquake Energy Dissipation System by Genetic Algorithm , 2013, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[37]  Anastasios Sextos,et al.  Selection of earthquake ground motion records: A state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective , 2010 .

[38]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Earthquake Accelerogram Selection and Scaling Procedures for Estimating the Distribution of Drift Response , 2011 .

[39]  L. Luzi,et al.  Reference database for seismic ground-motion in Europe (RESORCE) , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[40]  G. Weatherill,et al.  OpenQuake Engine: An Open Hazard (and Risk) Software for the Global Earthquake Model , 2014 .

[41]  Anastasios Sextos Selection of Ground Motions for Response History Analysis , 2014 .

[42]  Y. Dong,et al.  An application of swarm optimization to nonlinear programming , 2005 .

[43]  Xavier Romão,et al.  SelEQ: a web-based application for the selection of earthquake ground motions for structural analysis , 2010 .

[44]  Carlo Meletti,et al.  The 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model: key components and results , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[45]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Conditional spectrum‐based ground motion selection. Part II: Intensity‐based assessments and evaluation of alternative target spectra , 2013 .

[46]  Zong Woo Geem,et al.  A New Heuristic Optimization Algorithm: Harmony Search , 2001, Simul..

[47]  Mehmet Polat Saka,et al.  Optimum design of unbraced steel frames to LRFD-AISC using particle swarm optimization , 2012, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[48]  Roberto Paolucci,et al.  Engineering ground motion record selection in the ITalian ACcelerometric Archive , 2011 .

[49]  Kapil Khandelwal,et al.  Comparison of robustness of metaheuristic algorithms for steel frame optimization , 2015 .

[50]  Curt B. Haselton,et al.  Seismic Collapse Safety of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. I: Assessment of Ductile Moment Frames , 2011 .

[51]  S. Harmsen,et al.  Conditional Spectrum Computation Incorporating Multiple Causal Earthquakes and Ground-Motion Prediction Models , 2013 .

[52]  Ellen M. Rathje,et al.  A Semi-Automated Procedure for Selecting and Scaling Recorded Earthquake Motions for Dynamic Analysis , 2008 .

[53]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Conditional Hazard Maps for Secondary Intensity Measures , 2010 .

[54]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis , 2010 .

[55]  Hongping Zhu,et al.  Proposed Strategy for the Application of the Modified Harmony Search Algorithm to Code-Based Selection and Scaling of Ground Motions , 2014 .

[56]  José Miguel Castro,et al.  Code‐based record selection methods for seismic performance assessment of buildings , 2016 .

[57]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  An evaluation of the applicability of the NGA models to ground-motion prediction in the Euro-Mediterranean region , 2008 .

[58]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Sensitivity of Seismic Response and Fragility to Parameter Uncertainty , 2007 .

[59]  José Miguel Castro,et al.  A Critical Review of European and American Provisions for the Seismic Assessment of Existing Steel Moment-Resisting Frame Buildings , 2018 .

[60]  J. Douglas,et al.  Internet site for European strong-motion data , 2004 .

[61]  B. Bradley A generalized conditional intensity measure approach and holistic ground‐motion selection , 2010 .

[62]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Selection and Scaling of Real Accelerograms for Bi-Directional Loading: A Review of Current Practice and Code Provisions , 2007 .

[63]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Conditional spectrum‐based ground motion selection. Part I: Hazard consistency for risk‐based assessments , 2013 .

[64]  C. Cornell,et al.  Record Selection for Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of Structures , 2005 .