Two tales of time: uncovering the significance of sequential patterns among contribution types in knowledge-building discourse

ABSTRACT As collaborative learning is actualized through evolving dialogues, temporality inevitably matters for the analysis of collaborative learning. This study attempts to uncover sequential patterns that distinguish “productive” threads of knowledge-building discourse. A database of Grade 1–6 knowledge-building discourse was first coded for the posts’ contribution types and discussion threads’ productivity. Two distinctive temporal analysis techniques – Lag-sequential Analysis (LsA) and Frequent Sequence Mining (FSM) – were subsequently applied to detecting sequential patterns among contribution types that distinguish productive threads. The findings of LsA indicated that threads that were characterized by mere opinion-giving did not achieve much progress, while threads having more transitions among questioning, obtaining information, working with information, and theorizing were more productive. FSM further uncovered from productive threads distinguishing frequent sequences involving sustained theorizing, integrated use of evidence, and problematization of proposed theories. Based on the significance of studying temporality in collaborative learning revealed in the study, we advocate for more analytics tapping into temporality of learning.

[1]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Challenging Assumptions: using sliding window visualizations to reveal time-based irregularities in CSCL processes , 2012, ICLS.

[2]  Donald D. Dorfman,et al.  Lag sequential analysis: Robust statistical methods. , 1987 .

[3]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[4]  M. Scardamalia.  Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge , 2002 .

[5]  Bodong Chen,et al.  Analytics for Knowledge Creation: Towards Epistemic Agency and Design-Mode Thinking , 2016, J. Learn. Anal..

[6]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Knowledge builgind and knowledge creation: theory, pedagogy and technology , 2014 .

[7]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Analyzing temporal patterns of knowledge construction in a role-based online discussion , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[8]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Knowledge Building and Knowledge Creation , 2014 .

[9]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[10]  Monica Resendes,et al.  Enhancing Knowledge Building Discourse in Early Primary Education: Effects of Formative Feedback , 2014 .

[11]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Ways of Contributing to an Explanation-Seeking Dialogue in Science and History , 2011 .

[12]  Jie Xu,et al.  Modeling Eye Gaze Patterns in Clinician–Patient Interaction With Lag Sequential Analysis , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Group-level formative feedback and metadiscourse , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[14]  Neil Mercer,et al.  The Seeds of Time: Why Classroom Dialogue Needs a Temporal Analysis , 2008 .

[15]  Jaideep Srivastava,et al.  Selecting the right objective measure for association analysis , 2004, Inf. Syst..

[16]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Practices and orientations of CSCL , 2004 .

[17]  Judy Kay,et al.  Clustering and Sequential Pattern Mining of Online Collaborative Learning Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[18]  Robert A. Reiser,et al.  Group Cognition , 1988 .

[19]  Bodong Chen,et al.  It's about time: 4th international workshop on temporal analyses of learning data , 2015, LAK.

[20]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Learning Science: A Singular Plural Perspective , 2006 .

[21]  R. Shores,et al.  Lag Sequential Analysis as a Tool for Functional Analysis of Student Disruptive Behavior in Classrooms , 1993 .

[22]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Frequent pattern mining: current status and future directions , 2007, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[23]  Joseph A. Allen,et al.  A Sequential Analysis of Procedural Meeting Communication: How Teams Facilitate Their Meetings , 2013 .

[24]  Manu Kapur,et al.  Temporality matters: Advancing a method for analyzing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[25]  Ann Kovalchick,et al.  Education And Technology: An Encyclopedia , 2003 .

[26]  Yoshiaki Matsuzawa,et al.  Knowledge Building Discourse Explorer: a social network analysis application for knowledge building discourse , 2012 .

[27]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[28]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[29]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[30]  Huang-Yao Hong,et al.  Schools as Knowledge-Building Organizations: Thirty Years of Design Research , 2016 .

[31]  Richard Holm,et al.  A FORTRAN program for lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction data , 1979 .

[32]  Mohammed J. Zaki,et al.  SPADE: An Efficient Algorithm for Mining Frequent Sequences , 2004, Machine Learning.

[33]  Tobias Hecking,et al.  Analyzing the Main Paths of Knowledge Evolution and Contributor Roles in an Open Learning Community , 2014, J. Learn. Anal..

[34]  B P O'Connor,et al.  Simple and flexible SAS and SPSS programs for analyzing lag-sequential categorical data , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[35]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: multiple methods for integrated understanding , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[36]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds , 2007 .

[37]  S. Tan,et al.  Professional Development of Teachers for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: A Knowledge-Building Approach , 2009, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[38]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  Explaining authors’ contribution to pivotal artifacts during mass collaboration in the Wikipedia’s knowledge base , 2013, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[39]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[40]  Jan van Aalst,et al.  Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[41]  Bodong Chen,et al.  18. Modi di contribuire ad un dialogo per la ricerca di spiegazioni , 2011 .

[42]  Bodong Chen,et al.  Putting temporal analytics into practice: the 5th international workshop on temporality in learning data , 2016, LAK.

[43]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology , 2006 .

[44]  Karen Littleton,et al.  Productivity through interaction: an overview , 1999 .

[45]  KoprinskaIrena,et al.  Clustering and Sequential Pattern Mining of Online Collaborative Learning Data , 2009 .