Plasticity of the human auditory cortex induced by discrimination learning of non-native, mora-timed contrasts of the Japanese language.

In this magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study, we examined with high temporal resolution the traces of learning in the speech-dominant left-hemispheric auditory cortex as a function of newly trained mora-timing. In Japanese, the "mora" is a temporal unit that divides words into almost isochronous segments (e.g., na-ka-mu-ra and to-o-kyo-o each comprises four mora). Changes in the brain responses of a group of German and Japanese subjects to differences in the mora structure of Japanese words were compared. German subjects performed a discrimination training in 10 sessions of 1.5 h each day. They learned to discriminate Japanese pairs of words (in a consonant, anni-ani; and a vowel, kiyo-kyo, condition), where the second word was shortened by one mora in eight steps of 15 msec each. A significant increase in learning performance, as reflected by behavioral measures, was observed, accompanied by a significant increase of the amplitude of the Mismatch Negativity Field (MMF). The German subjects' hit rate for detecting durational deviants increased by up to 35%. Reaction times and MMF latencies decreased significantly across training sessions. Japanese subjects showed a more sensitive MMF to smaller differences. Thus, even in young adults, perceptual learning of non-native mora-timing occurs rapidly and deeply. The enhanced behavioral and neurophysiological sensitivity found after training indicates a strong relationship between learning and (plastic) changes in the cortical substrate.

[1]  Eugen Diesch,et al.  The magnetic mismatch field elicited by words and phonological non‐words , 1998, Neuroreport.

[2]  Hideki Kawahara,et al.  Restructuring speech representations using a pitch-adaptive time-frequency smoothing and an instantaneous-frequency-based F0 extraction: Possible role of a repetitive structure in sounds , 1999, Speech Commun..

[3]  D Petersen,et al.  Cortical DC-potentials in identification of the language-dominant hemisphere: linguistical and clinical aspects. , 1993, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum.

[4]  Bernhard Ross,et al.  The Neurotopography of Vowels as Mirrored by Evoked Magnetic Field Measurements , 1996, Brain and Language.

[5]  P. Eimas The perception of speech in early infancy. , 1985, Scientific American.

[6]  H. Goto,et al.  Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds "L" and "R". , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Juha Virtanen,et al.  Hemispheric lateralization in preattentive processing of speech sounds , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  K. Alho Cerebral Generators of Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and Its Magnetic Counterpart (MMNm) Elicited by Sound Changes , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[9]  A. Cutler,et al.  Mora or Phoneme? Further Evidence for Language-Specific Listening , 1994 .

[10]  Y. Tohkura,et al.  The effects of experimental variables on the perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese listeners , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Functional Specialization of the Human Auditory Cortex in Processing Phonetic and Musical Sounds: A Magnetoencephalographic (MEG) Study , 1999, NeuroImage.

[13]  G. Dehaene-Lambertz,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for automatic phonetic processing in neonates , 2001, Neuroreport.

[14]  Makio Kashino,et al.  Phoneme/syllable perception and the temporal structure of speech , 1996 .

[15]  Takayuki Arai,et al.  Japanese Mora-Timing: A Review , 2000, Phonetica.

[16]  R Näätänen,et al.  Pre-attentive detection of vowel contrasts utilizes both phonetic and auditory memory representations. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  K. Stevens,et al.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.

[18]  P. Kuhl Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  G. Dehaene-Lambertz Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults , 1997, Neuroreport.

[20]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Hans Basbøll,et al.  Consonant Length, Stød and Morae in Standard Danish , 2001, Phonetica.

[22]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses , 1997, Nature.

[23]  Katsura Aoyama A Psycholinguistic Perspective on Finnish and Japanese Prosody , 2001 .

[24]  M. Dorman,et al.  Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Memory Traces for Words as Revealed by the Mismatch Negativity , 2001, NeuroImage.

[26]  R. Jung,et al.  Zur hemispha¨rendominanz fu¨r sprache und rechnen: Elektrophysiologische korrelate einer linksdominanz bei linksha¨ndern , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  T. Carrell,et al.  Central Auditory System Plasticity Associated with Speech Discrimination Training , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  R Salmelin,et al.  Left-hemisphere dominance for processing of vowels: a whole-scalp neuromagnetic study. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[29]  R Näätänen,et al.  Phoneme representations of the human brain as reflected by event-related potentials. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[30]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  P. Kuhl Learning and representation in speech and language , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[33]  Larry E. Roberts,et al.  Plastic changes in the auditory cortex induced by intensive frequency discrimination training , 2000, Neuroreport.

[34]  C Pantev,et al.  Magnetic and electric brain activity evoked by the processing of tone and vowel stimuli , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[35]  P. Alku,et al.  Are different kinds of acoustic features processed differently for speech and non-speech sounds? , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[36]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Katsura Aoyama,et al.  A psycholinguistic perspective on Finnish and Japanese prosody: Perception, production and child acquisition of consonantal quantity distinctions , 2000 .

[38]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Lateralization of speech processing in the brain as indicated by mismatch negativity and dichotic listening. , 2000, Brain and cognition.

[39]  E. Schröger On the detection of auditory deviations: a pre-attentive activation model. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[40]  P. Ladefoged A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[41]  M Hoke,et al.  Evoked magnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to minor pitch changes: localization of the mismatch field. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[42]  Colin Yallop,et al.  An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology , 1990 .