An Artificial Robot Nervous System To Teach Robots How To Feel Pain And Reflexively React To Potentially Damaging Contacts

In this letter, we introduce the concept of an artificial Robot Nervous System (aRNS) as a novel way of unifying multimodal physical stimuli sensation with robot pain-reflex movements. We focus on the formalization of robot pain, based on insights from human pain research, as an interpretation of tactile sensation. Specifically, pain signals are used to adapt the equilibrium position, stiffness, and feedforward torque of a pain-based impedance controller. The schemes are experimentally validated with the KUKA LWR4+ for simulated and real physical collisions using the BioTac sensor.

[1]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Postural primitives: Interactive Behavior for a Humanoid Robot Arm , 1996 .

[2]  H. Fruhstorfer,et al.  Capillary blood sampling: How much pain is necessary?. Part 2: Relation between penetration depth and puncture pain , 1995 .

[3]  S. Yigit,et al.  Applying reflexes to enhance safe human-robot- co-operation with a humanlike robot arm , 2003 .

[4]  Sergiy Yakovenko,et al.  Contribution of stretch reflexes to locomotor control: a modeling study , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Collision detection and reaction: A contribution to safe physical Human-Robot Interaction , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[6]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  Danfei Xu,et al.  Tactile identification of objects using Bayesian exploration , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Lars Arendt-Nielsen,et al.  Pressure-pain function in desensitized and hypersensitized muscle and skin assessed by cuff algometry. , 2002, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[9]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Cartesian impedance control of redundant robots: recent results with the DLR-light-weight-arms , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[10]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Optimal control for exploiting the natural dynamics of Variable Stiffness robots , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Safety Evaluation of Physical Human-Robot Interaction via Crash-Testing , 2007, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[12]  Sami Haddadin,et al.  Towards Safe Robots - Approaching Asimov's 1st Law , 2013, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics.

[13]  Changes in pain from a repetitive thermal stimulus: The roles of adaptation and sensitization , 2011, PAIN®.

[14]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Collision Detection and Safe Reaction with the DLR-III Lightweight Manipulator Arm , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[15]  Sebastian Klug,et al.  Biologically Inspired Reflex Based Stabilization Control of a Humanoid Robot with Artificial SMA Muscles , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[16]  M. Paradiso,et al.  Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain , 1996 .

[17]  Qiang Huang,et al.  Sensory reflex control for humanoid walking , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[18]  Torbjørn S. Dahl,et al.  A Force-Distance Model of Humanoid Arm Withdrawal Reflexes , 2012, TAROS.

[19]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Designing optimally safe robot surface properties for minimizing the stress characteristics of human-robot collisions , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[20]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Playing it safe [human-friendly robots] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.