Effects of Posthypnotic Suggestion on Perceived Egocentric Distance

The effects of posthypnotic suggestion on the perception of egocentric distance were evaluated by two methods, one direct and the other indirect. The direct method was the verbal report of the perceived distance of the stimulus. The indirect method used a measure based on apparent concomitant motion of the stimulus with a lateral movement of the head. The indirect method, unlike the direct method, has been shown to be insensitive to cognitive biases. Two highly trained hypnotic observers received posthypnotic suggestions to see a point of light at approximately 2, 4, or 6 ft (61, 122, or 183 cm) from themselves. For each suggested distance the light was physically at 2, 4, or 6 ft. As a control, trials were completed using these same physical distances without the posthypnotic suggestions. Nine experimental trials, one for each combination of suggested distance and physical distance, constituted a trial set. One observer completed three sets, and the other completed two sets. It was found that the posthypnotic suggestions affected the direct but not the indirect measures of the perceived distances of the light.

[1]  John M. Foley,et al.  Primary Distance Perception , 1978 .

[2]  R. E. Newton,et al.  An Apparatus for Indirect Measurement of Perceived Distance , 1976, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  R. J. Miller,et al.  Effect of hypnotically induced hallucination of a color filter. , 1970, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[4]  N. Spanos,et al.  Two attempts to replicate the Parrish-Lundy-Liebowitz experiment on hypnotic age regression. , 1972, The American journal of clinical hypnosis.

[5]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  An indirect measure of perceived distance from oculomotor cues , 1977 .

[6]  E. Levitt,et al.  Nystagmus as a Criterion of Hypnotically Induced Visual Hallucinations , 1964, Science.

[7]  H. Leibowitz,et al.  The effect of hypnotic ablation of the background on the magnitude of the Ponzo perspective illusion. , 1973, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis.

[8]  B. Wallace,et al.  Restoration of eidetic imagery via hypnotic age regression: a preliminary report. , 1976, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[9]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  The effect of perceived distance on perceived movement , 1974 .

[10]  G H DECKERT,et al.  Pursuit Eye Movements in the Absence of a Moving Visual Stimulus , 1964, Science.

[11]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  A comparison of oculomotor and motion parallax cues of egocentric distance , 1979, Vision Research.

[12]  M. Erickson,et al.  The hypnotic induction of hallucinatory color vision followed by pseudo-negative after-images , 1938 .

[13]  B. Sidis.  Are there hypnotic hallucinations , 1906 .

[14]  T. Barber.  The afterimages of hallucinated and imagined colors. , 1959, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[15]  K. Gummerman,et al.  The enigmatic eidetic image: a critical examination of methods, data, and theories. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  An indirect method of measuring perceived distance from familiar size , 1976 .

[17]  H. Leibowitz,et al.  Hypnotic Age-Regression and Magnitudes of the Ponzo and Poggendorff Illusions , 1968, Science.

[18]  T. Barber.  Toward a theory of “hypnotic” behavior: Positive visual and auditory hallucinations , 1964 .

[19]  G. S. Blum.  A case study of hypnotically induced tubular vision. , 1975, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[20]  H. Leibowitz,et al.  The effect of hypnotic age regression on size constancy. , 1972, American Journal of Psychology.

[21]  W C Gogel,et al.  Eye Fixation and Attention as Modifiers of Perceived Distance , 1977, Perceptual and motor skills.

[22]  Underwood Hw.  The validity of hypnotically induced visual hallucinations. , 1960 .