Establishing Quality Control Procedures for Large-Scale Plasma Proteomics Analyses.

Proteomics research has been transformed due to high-throughput liquid chromatography (LC-MS/MS) tandem mass spectrometry instruments combined with highly sophisticated automated sample preparation and multiplexing workflows. However, scaling proteomics experiments to large sample cohorts (hundreds to thousands) requires thoughtful quality control (QC) protocols. Robust QC protocols can help with reproducibility, quantitative accuracy, and provide opportunities for more decisive troubleshooting. Our laboratory conducted a plasma proteomics study of a cohort of N = 335 patient samples using tandem mass tag (TMTpro) 16-plex batches. Over the course of a 10-month data acquisition period for this cohort we collected 271 pooled QC LC-MS/MS result files obtained from MS/MS analysis of a patient-derived pooled plasma sample, representative of the entire cohort population. This sample was tagged with TMTzero or TMTpro reagents and used to inform the daily performance of the LC-MS/MS instruments and to allow within and across sample batch normalization. Analytical variability of a number of instrumental and data analysis metrics including protein and peptide identifications, peptide spectral matches (PSMs), number of obtained MS/MS spectra, average peptide abundance, percent of peptides with a Δ m/z between ±0.003 Da, percent of MS/MS spectra obtained at the maximum injection time, and the retention time of selected tracking peptides were evaluated to help inform the design of a robust LC-MS/MS QC workflow for use in future cohort studies. This study also led to general tips for using selected metrics to inform real-time troubleshooting of LC-MS/MS performance issues with daily QC checks.

[1]  Zhanghua Wu,et al.  TAG-TMTpro, a Hyperplexing Quantitative Approach for High-Throughput Proteomic Studies. , 2022, Analytical chemistry.

[2]  Timothy J. Hohman,et al.  Targeted Lipidomics To Measure Phospholipids and Sphingomyelins in Plasma: A Pilot Study To Understand the Impact of Race/Ethnicity in Alzheimer's Disease. , 2022, Analytical chemistry.

[3]  K. Kridin,et al.  Characterizing the proteome of bullous pemphigoid blister fluid utilizing tandem mass tag labeling coupled with LC–MS/MS , 2021, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[4]  H. Desaire,et al.  Dataset of why inclusion matters for Alzheimer's disease biomarker discovery in plasma , 2021, Data in Brief.

[5]  A. Sönnerborg,et al.  Utility of Proteomics in Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases Caused by RNA Viruses , 2020, Journal of proteome research.

[6]  C. Junot,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up proteomics of circulating S100A8/S100A9 in plasma of septic shock patients. , 2020, Journal of proteome research.

[7]  L. Azevedo,et al.  Lipid metabolism impairment in patients with sepsis secondary to hospital acquired pneumonia, a proteomic analysis , 2019, Clinical Proteomics.

[8]  Stefan Enroth,et al.  High throughput proteomics identifies a high-accuracy 11 plasma protein biomarker signature for ovarian cancer , 2019, Communications Biology.

[9]  Renã A. S. Robinson,et al.  Sample Multiplexing Strategies in Quantitative Proteomics. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  Olga Vitek,et al.  MSstatsQC 2.0: R/Bioconductor Package for Statistical Quality Control of Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Experiments. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[11]  Lennart Martens,et al.  Quality control in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. , 2018, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[12]  Lingjun Li,et al.  Increased N,N-Dimethyl Leucine Isobaric Tag Multiplexing by a Combined Precursor Isotopic Labeling and Isobaric Tagging Approach. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  Guadalupe Espadas,et al.  QCloud: A cloud-based quality control system for mass spectrometry-based proteomics laboratories , 2018, PloS one.

[14]  Michael J MacCoss,et al.  An Automated Pipeline to Monitor System Performance in Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Proteomic Experiments. , 2016, Journal of proteome research.

[15]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function , 2016, Nature.

[16]  A. Fagan,et al.  Changes in the plasma proteome at asymptomatic and symptomatic stages of autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Chris Bielow,et al.  Proteomics Quality Control: Quality Control Software for MaxQuant Results. , 2016, Journal of proteome research.

[18]  Ashley C. Gucinski,et al.  Performance metrics for evaluating system suitability in liquid chromatography—Mass spectrometry peptide mass mapping of protein therapeutics and monoclonal antibodies , 2015, mAbs.

[19]  Lennart Martens,et al.  iMonDB: Mass Spectrometry Quality Control through Instrument Monitoring. , 2015, Journal of proteome research.

[20]  J. Yates,et al.  Off-Line Multidimensional Liquid Chromatography and Auto Sampling Result in Sample Loss in LC/LC–MS/MS , 2014, Journal of proteome research.

[21]  Michael J. Sweredoski,et al.  Evaluation and optimization of mass spectrometric settings during data-dependent acquisition mode: focus on LTQ-Orbitrap mass analyzers. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[22]  Ronald J. Moore,et al.  Sources of technical variability in quantitative LC-MS proteomics: human brain tissue sample analysis. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[23]  K. Stejskal,et al.  Suppression of peptide sample losses in autosampler vials. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[24]  David L Tabb,et al.  Quality assessment for clinical proteomics. , 2013, Clinical biochemistry.

[25]  F. Nomura,et al.  Enhanced recovery of lyophilized peptides in shotgun proteomics by using an LC‐ESI‐MS compatible surfactant , 2013, Proteomics.

[26]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  SIMPATIQCO: A Server-Based Software Suite Which Facilitates Monitoring the Time Course of LC–MS Performance Metrics on Orbitrap Instruments , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[27]  Karen Phinney,et al.  A proteomics performance standard to support measurement quality in proteomics , 2012, Proteomics.

[28]  S. Hess,et al.  Effect of mass spectrometric parameters on peptide and protein identification rates for shotgun proteomic experiments on an LTQ‐orbitrap mass analyzer , 2012, Proteomics.

[29]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Quality control in LC‐MS/MS , 2011, Proteomics.

[30]  Albert Sickmann,et al.  Quality control of nano‐LC‐MS systems using stable isotope‐coded peptides , 2011, Proteomics.

[31]  R. Dean,et al.  Improving Proteome Coverage on a LTQ-Orbitrap Using Design of Experiments , 2011, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[32]  Birgit Schilling,et al.  Repeatability and reproducibility in proteomic identifications by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[33]  J. Garin,et al.  Peptide storage: are you getting the best return on your investment? Defining optimal storage conditions for proteomics samples. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[34]  R. Cooks,et al.  Orbitrap mass spectrometry: instrumentation, ion motion and applications. , 2008, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[35]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  The impact of peptide abundance and dynamic range on stable-isotope-based quantitative proteomic analyses. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[36]  John R. Yates,et al.  The biological impact of mass-spectrometry-based proteomics , 2007, Nature.

[37]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass Spectrometry and Protein Analysis , 2006, Science.

[38]  J. Yates Mass spectral analysis in proteomics. , 2004, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.