USING SIGNAL‐CONTINGENT EXPERIENCE SAMPLING METHODOLOGY TO STUDY WORK IN THE FIELD: A DISCUSSION AND ILLUSTRATION EXAMINING TASK PERCEPTIONS AND MOOD

In this article, the advantages and drawbacks of using Experience Sampling Methodology (ESM), especially signal-contingent ESM, to study psychological variables in the workplace are described. It is argued that ESM can be a valuable tool in the field study of work, with the potential to answer different research questions than can be answered by traditional cross-sectional research. To illustrate ESM, an application of signal-contingent ESM to the examination of mood and concurrent task perceptions at work is presented. Study results indicate that both perceived goal progress and skill on task influence task enjoyment and mood. Also described and illustrated is an adaptation of pooled time-series hierarchical regression for analyzing immediate, short-term retrospective (end-of-day), and individual difference variables in a single framework. In conjunction, ESM data collection and hierarchical regression analysis provide a useful approach for studies that examine immediate work experiences.

[1]  Robert A Emmons,et al.  Personal strivings, daily life events, and psychological and physical well-being. , 1991, Journal of personality.

[2]  L. Gauvin,et al.  Application of the Experience Sampling Method to the Study of the Effects of Exercise Withdrawal on Weil-Being , 1992 .

[3]  D. Watson,et al.  Toward a consensual structure of mood. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  C. Carver,et al.  Origins and Functions of Positive and Negative Affect: A Control-Process View. , 1990 .

[5]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Self‐Recording of Everyday Life Events: Origins, Types, and Uses , 1991 .

[6]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience in work and leisure. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  H. Klein,et al.  An Integrated Control Theory Model of Work Motivation , 1989 .

[8]  W. Fleeson,et al.  Life Tasks and Daily Life Experience , 1991 .

[9]  Steve Williams,et al.  Does training in problem solving improve the quality of group decisions , 1991 .

[10]  H. Mano Judgments under distress: Assessing the role of unpleasantness and arousal in judgment formation , 1992 .

[11]  A. Stone,et al.  Effects of severe daily events on mood. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Peter Warr,et al.  The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health , 1990 .

[13]  J. Jaccard,et al.  Statistical analysis of temporal data with many observations: Issues for behavioral medicine data. , 1993 .

[14]  R. Kessler,et al.  Measuring daily events and experiences: decisions for the researcher. , 1991, Journal of personality.

[15]  K. Williams,et al.  Chapter 6 Perceived Self-Competence and Organizational Behavior , 1992 .

[16]  P. Hanges,et al.  A control system model of organizational motivation: Theoretical development and applied implications , 1987 .

[17]  D. McAdams,et al.  Intimacy and affiliation motives in daily living: An experience sampling analysis , 1983 .

[18]  C. Cutrona,et al.  Behavioral manifestations of social support: a microanalytic investigation. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  S. Hormuth The sampling of experiences in situ , 1986 .

[20]  James A. Stimson Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay , 1985 .

[21]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[22]  D. Watson,et al.  Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  S. West,et al.  Statistical issues in the study of temporal data: daily experiences. , 1991, Journal of personality.

[24]  Hermann Brandst tter Emotional responses to other persons in everyday life situations. , 1983 .

[25]  R. Kessler,et al.  Effects of daily stress on negative mood. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.