How academics use technology in teaching and learning: understanding the relationship between beliefs and practice

This paper reports on a detailed investigation into the beliefs and practices of teachers in 22 computer-assisted learning projects in Australia in the mid-1990s. Detailed interview data were obtained, supported by the project software and other curriculum materials. The interview transcripts and documentary material were collated and condensed into rich descriptions; these were then coded on a number of belief and practice dimensions. The resulting profiles were clustered into five belief‐practice categories: thoughtful instructors, pre-emptive professionals, conversational constructivists, learning facilitators and situated knowledge negotiators. These complex, yet interpretable, patterns of relationships between beliefs and practices are useful in understanding teachers’ reluctance to change their teaching, one instance of which is the relatively limited uptake of technology in higher education.

[1]  Samuel Totten,et al.  Cooperative learning : a guide to research , 1991 .

[2]  D. Kember.  A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching , 1997 .

[3]  J. Bain,et al.  Describing Computer-facilitated Learning Environments in Higher Education , 1998 .

[4]  Kathleen M. Quinlan.  Commonalities and controversy in context: a study of academic historians’ educational beliefs , 1999 .

[5]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[6]  Katherine Samuelowicz,et al.  Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers , 1992 .

[7]  J. Biggs.  What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning , 1999 .

[8]  Nira Hativa,et al.  Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education , 2002 .

[9]  L. Shulman.  Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[10]  J. H. Ward.  Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[11]  Dennis Fox,et al.  Personal theories of teaching , 1983 .

[12]  John D. Bain,et al.  Orientations to research higher degree supervision , 2007 .

[13]  Aaron Doering,et al.  Integrating Educational Technology Into Teaching , 1996 .

[14]  Mary M. Kennedy,et al.  Knowledge and Teaching , 2002 .

[15]  Katherine Samuelowicz,et al.  Identifying academics' orientations to assessment practice , 2002 .

[16]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Data clustering: a review , 1999, CSUR.

[17]  Edgar Stones,et al.  Quality Teaching: A Sample of Cases , 1994 .

[18]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science , 1994 .

[19]  Katherine Samuelowicz,et al.  Revisiting academics' beliefs about teaching and learning , 2001 .

[20]  J. Roschelle.  Learning by Collaborating: Convergent Conceptual Change , 1992 .

[21]  Sandra Wills,et al.  Evaluation of computer-based learning in higher education , 1996, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[22]  Gordon Pask,et al.  CONVERSATIONAL TECHNIQUES IN THE STUDY AND PRACTICE OF EDUCATION , 1976 .

[23]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition , 2003 .

[24]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology , 1993 .

[25]  Kathleen M. Quinlan,et al.  Scholarly Dimensions of Academics' Beliefs about Engineering Education , 2002 .