Notochord morphogenesis in Xenopus laevis: simulation of cell behavior underlying tissue convergence and extension.

Cell intercalation and cell shape changes drive notochord morphogenesis in the African frog, Xenopus laevis. Experimental observations show that cells elongate mediolaterally and intercalate between one another, causing the notochord to lengthen and narrow. Descriptive observations provide few clues as to the mechanisms that coordinate and drive these cell movements. It is possible that a few rules governing cell behavior could orchestrate the shaping of the entire tissue. We test this hypothesis by constructing a computer model of the tissue to investigate how rules governing cell motility and cell-cell interactions can account for the major features of notochord morphogenesis. These rules are drawn from the literature on in vitro cell studies and experimental observations of notochord cell behavior. The following types of motility rules are investigated: (1) refractory tissue boundaries that inhibit cell motility, (2) statistical persistence of motion, (3) contact inhibition of protrusion between cells, and (4) polarized and nonpolarized protrusive activity. We show that only the combination of refractory boundaries, contact inhibition and polarized protrusive activity reproduces normal notochord development. Guided by these rules, cells spontaneously align into a parallel array of elongating cells. Self alignment optimizes the geometric conditions for polarized protrusive activity by progressively minimizing contact inhibition between cells. Cell polarization, initiated at refractory tissue boundaries, spreads along successive cell rows into the tissue interior as cells restrict and constrain their neighbors' directional bias. The model demonstrates that several experimentally observed intrinsic cell behaviors, operating simultaneously, may underlie the generation of coordinated cell movements within the developing notochord.

[1]  G. Oster Biophysics of the leading lamella. , 1988, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[2]  D. Sulsky,et al.  A model of cell sorting. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  K. Kani,et al.  Cell movements in a living mammalian tissue: Long‐term observation of individual cells in wounded corneal endothelia of cats , 1982, Journal of morphology.

[4]  D. Fristrom,et al.  The mechanism of evagination of imaginal discs of Drosophila melanogaster. III. Evidence for cell rearrangement. , 1976, Developmental biology.

[5]  M. S. Cooper,et al.  Cell intercalation during notochord development in Xenopus laevis. , 1989, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[6]  G. Odell,et al.  Neurulation and the cortical tractor model for epithelial folding. , 1986, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[7]  J Hardin,et al.  Cell Behaviour During Active Cell Rearrangement: Evidence and Speculations , 1987, Journal of Cell Science.

[8]  G. Oster,et al.  A model for chondrogenic condensations in the developing limb: the role of extracellular matrix and cell tractions. , 1985, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[9]  P. Alberch,et al.  The mechanical basis of morphogenesis. I. Epithelial folding and invagination. , 1981, Developmental biology.

[10]  G. Oster,et al.  Cell rearrangement and segmentation in Xenopus: direct observation of cultured explants. , 1989, Development.

[11]  A. Harris,et al.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.

[12]  Caste and ecology in the social insects , 1979 .

[13]  C. Erickson,et al.  Analysis of the formation of parallel arrays by BHK cells in vitro. , 1978, Experimental cell research.

[14]  D. Bounds New optimization methods from physics and biology , 1987, Nature.

[15]  J. Hardin,et al.  Local shifts in position and polarized motility drive cell rearrangement during sea urchin gastrulation. , 1989, Developmental biology.

[16]  R. Mazo,et al.  A model for shape generation by strain and cell-cell adhesion in the epithelium of an arthropod leg segment. , 1983, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  J. Kolega,et al.  Effects of mechanical tension on protrusive activity and microfilament and intermediate filament organization in an epidermal epithelium moving in culture , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  C. Kimmel,et al.  Cell movements during epiboly and gastrulation in zebrafish. , 1990, Development.

[19]  R. Keller,et al.  Time‐lapse cinemicrographic analysis of superficial cell behavior during and prior to gastrulation in Xenopus laevis , 1978, Journal of morphology.

[20]  G. Oster,et al.  The mechanical basis of cell rearrangement. I. Epithelial morphogenesis during Fundulus epiboly. , 1990, Development.

[21]  J. Hopfield,et al.  Computing with neural circuits: a model. , 1986, Science.

[22]  C. Erickson Contact behaviour and pattern formation of BHK and polyoma virus-transformed BHK fibroblasts in culture. , 1978, Journal of cell science.

[23]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  Interference microscope studies of cell contacts in tissue culture. , 1958, Experimental cell research.

[24]  P. Tibbetts,et al.  Mediolateral cell intercalation in the dorsal, axial mesoderm of Xenopus laevis. , 1989, Developmental biology.

[25]  R. Winklbauer Mesodermal cell migration during Xenopus gastrulation. , 1990, Developmental biology.

[26]  John Philip Trinkaus,et al.  Cells into Organs: The Forces That Shape the Embryo , 1984 .

[27]  Louis Y. Cheng,et al.  The mechanisms and mechanics of archenteron elongation during sea urchin gastrulation , 1986 .

[28]  S. A. MacKay Computer simulation of aggregation in Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1978, Journal of cell science.

[29]  R. Keller,et al.  The Cellular Basis of Gastrulation in Xenopus laevis: Active, Postinvolution Convergence and Extension by Mediolateral Interdigitation , 1984 .