THE EFFECT OF REPUTATION ON THE DECISION TO JOINT VENTURE

This paper focuses on the impact that reputation has on the decision to proceed with a strategic alliance. Employing reputation constructs adapted from the Fortune Corporate Reputation Survey, we manipulated a target firm’s reputation in an experimental design. The subjects were placed in the role of CEO of the partner firm and asked whether they would engage in the alliance. Findings indicate that (1) reputation is a multidimensional construct, (2) the personal information-processing characteristics of the decision-maker mediate the reputation effect and may suppress the reputation information, (3) subjects may compensate weaker elements of reputation for stronger ones when making decisions, (4) product and management reputation are the most important factors, and (5) reputation is a factor affecting the decision regardless of whether the proposed target is a supplier or a competitor. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  H. Rao.  The Social Construction of Reputation: Certification Contests, Legitimation, and the Survival of Organizations in the American Automobile Industry: 1895–1912 , 1994 .

[2]  C. Fombrun,et al.  What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy , 1990 .

[3]  S. Mark Young,et al.  Managerial Reputation and the Informativeness of Accounting and Market Measures of Performance , 1993 .

[4]  M. Gordon,et al.  The “Science of the Sophomore” Revisited: from Conjecture to Empiricism , 1986 .

[5]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Collective Strategy: Social Ecology of Organizational Environments. , 1983 .

[6]  Rudi K. F. Bresser.  Matching collective and competitive strategies , 1988 .

[7]  Gerald E. Fryxell,et al.  The Fortune Corporate 'Reputation' Index: Reputation for What? , 1994 .

[8]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[9]  R. Grant.  The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[10]  R. Hall.  The strategic analysis of intangible resources , 1992 .

[11]  J. Hagedoorn.  Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences , 1993 .

[12]  Christine Oliver,et al.  The Collective Strategy Framework: An Application to Competing Predictions of Isomorphism , 1988 .

[13]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[14]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications , 1988 .

[15]  M. K. D. Vries,et al.  Top Executive Locus of Control and Its Relationship to Strategy-Making, Structure, and Environment , 1982 .

[16]  A. Tsui.  A role set analysis of managerial reputation , 1984 .

[17]  T. S. Bateman,et al.  The psychological context of strategic decisions: A model and convergent experimental findings , 1989 .

[18]  J. E. Forrest,et al.  Strategic Alliances and the Small Technology-Based Firm , 1990 .

[19]  Peter Burke,et al.  Log-linear models , 1980 .

[20]  B. Brown,et al.  REMOVING THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE HALO FROM FORTUNE'S "MOST ADMIRED" COMPANIES , 1994 .

[21]  D. O. Sears.  College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. , 1986 .

[22]  Paul E. Spector.  Development of the Work Locus of Control Scale , 1988 .

[23]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management , 1992 .

[24]  P. Gove.  Webster's Third New International Dictionary , 1986 .

[25]  Rudi K. F. Bresser,et al.  Collective Strategy: Vice or Virtue? , 1986 .

[26]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Honeymoons and the Liability of Adolescence: A New Perspective on Duration Dependence in Social and Organizational Relationships , 1991 .