Coalition government and satisfaction with democracy: An analysis of New Zealand's reaction to proportional representation.

Following approval of a referendum in 1993, New Zealand replaced its first-past-the-post electoral system with proportional representation (PR). Although support for PR was initially high, less than a third expressed support for the new system a year and a half after its implementation. We examine two explanations for this decline. One theory assumes that dissatisfaction with the new system is the result of a growing alienation with politics, exacerbated by an unpopular coalition government that voters neither expected nor desired. Another theory assumes that evaluations of the new system are mediated by a preference for coalition or single party government. Our results indicate that a preference for single party government, guided primarily by partisan self-interest, has the largest impact. Nevertheless, negative evaluations of the performance of the coalition government helped contribute to a loss in support for PR suggesting that government performance can affect citizen's evaluation of political institutions, particularly when systems undergo radical change.

[1]  M. Wattenberg,et al.  Mixed‐Member Electoral Systems: A Definition and Typology , 2003 .

[2]  S. Banducci,et al.  Strategic Voting, party activity, and candidate effects: Testing explanations for split voting in New Zealand's new mixed system. , 2002 .

[3]  S. Bowler,et al.  Citizen Opinion and Constitutional Choices: The Case of the UK , 2000 .

[4]  Arend Lijphart Patterns of democracy : government forms and performance in thirty-six countries , 2000 .

[5]  S. Banducci,et al.  Proportional representation and attitudes about politics: results from New Zealand 1 Authors' names , 1999 .

[6]  D. Farrell,et al.  British Voters and Their Criteria for Evaluating Electoral Systems , 1999 .

[7]  Jeffrey A. Karp,et al.  Perceptions of Fairness and Support for Proportional Representation , 1999 .

[8]  H. Klingemann,et al.  Citizens and the State: A Changing Relationship? , 1998 .

[9]  A. Blais,et al.  Turnout in electoral democracies , 1998 .

[10]  C. Anderson,et al.  Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems , 1997, American Political Science Review.

[11]  J. Vowles,et al.  Party Interests, Public Opinion and Institutional Preferences: Electoral System Change in New Zealand , 1996 .

[12]  S. Keeter,et al.  What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters , 1996 .

[13]  J. Vowles,et al.  Towards Consensus?: The 1993 General Election in New Zealand and the Transition to Proportional Representation , 1995 .

[14]  M. Weatherford,et al.  Measuring Political Legitimacy , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[15]  M. Weatherford,et al.  How does government performance influence political support? , 1987 .

[16]  R. Rose,et al.  Electoral participation : a comparative analysis , 1982, American Political Science Review.

[17]  E. Porritt Electoral Reform in the United Kingdom , 1917, American Political Science Review.

[18]  J. Curtice,et al.  Wise after the event? Attitudes to voting reform following the 1999 Scottish and Welsh elections , 2000 .

[19]  Henry Milner Making every vote count : reassessing Canada's electoral system , 1999 .

[20]  Klaus Eder,et al.  The social construction of nature , 1996 .