Navicular Stress Fractures: A Prospective Study on Athletes

Background: Navicular stress fractures of the foot often are difficult to diagnose and treat. Methods: Nineteen athletic patients seen from 1999 to 2003, were compared to a previously treated group of 22 athletes with similar injuries treated from 1994 to 1998. Based on the frontal plane CT images, a previously described classification system was used to assess the injury: type I dorsal cortical break; type II fracture extending into the navicular body; and type III fracture breaches two cortices. Nonoperative treatment was recommended for patients with type I injuries and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were recommended for those with type II and III injuries. The time to return to activity and ability to return to competition were assessed, along with differences between fracture type and gender. Results: Return to activity (RTA) was 4.0 months for the entire group. RTA for type I (four injuries), type II (eight injuries), and type III (seven injuries) was 3.8, 3.7, and 4.2 months, respectively. Fifteen of 16 competitive athletes returned to full competition, including all who had ORIF. Conclusions: Navicular stress fractures can take 4 months to heal with nonoperative or operative treatment. Surgery should be considered for more severe injuries, which can be assessed by CT scan.

[1]  R. Marks,et al.  Imaging of the navicular. , 2004, Foot and ankle clinics.

[2]  William R. Ledoux,et al.  Biomechanical Differences Among Pes Cavus, Neutrally Aligned, and Pes Planus Feet in Subjects with Diabetes , 2003, Foot & ankle international.

[3]  M. Coughlin Tarsal Navicular Stress Fractures , 2002 .

[4]  A. Saxena Return to athletic activity after foot and ankle surgery: a preliminary report on select procedures. , 2000, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[5]  A. Saxena,et al.  Results of treatment of 22 navicular stress fractures and a new proposed radiographic classification system. , 2000, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[6]  R. Quirk Stress Fractures of the Navicular , 1998, Foot & ankle international.

[7]  F. Benazzo,et al.  Use of Capacitive Coupled Electric Fields in Stress Fractures in Athletes , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  K. Khan,et al.  Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular bone: CT findings in 55 cases. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Richard H. Alfred,et al.  Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular , 1992, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  P. Brukner,et al.  Outcome of conservative and surgical management of navicular stress fracture in athletes , 1992, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  J. Kasser,et al.  Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. Association with vertebra plana. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  K. Fitch,et al.  Operation for non-union of stress fracture of the tarsal navicular. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  D. Antonelli,et al.  Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular in long-distance runners. , 1988, Clinics in sports medicine.

[14]  S. Arnoczky,et al.  Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular. A retrospective review of twenty-one cases. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  M. E. Blazina,et al.  Fatigue fracture of the tarsal navicular. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.