Discrete optimization via simulation using Gaussian Markov random fields

We construct a discrete optimization via simulation (DOvS) procedure using discrete Gaussian Markov random fields (GMRFs). Gaussian random fields (GRFs) are used in DOvS to balance exploration and exploitation. They enable computation of the expected improvement (EI) due to running the simulation to evaluate a feasible point of the optimization problem. Existing methods use GRFs with a continuous domain, which leads to dense covariance matrices, and therefore can be ill-suited for large-scale problems due to slow and ill-conditioned numerical computations. The use of GMRFs leads to sparse precision matrices, on which several sparse matrix techniques can be applied. To allocate the simulation effort throughout the procedure, we introduce a new EI criterion that incorporates the uncertainty in stochastic simulation by treating the value at the current optimal point as a random variable.

[1]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[2]  Barry L. Nelson,et al.  Optimization via simulation over discrete decision variables , 2010 .

[3]  Lihua Sun,et al.  Optimization via simulation using Gaussian Process-based Search , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[4]  Ronald L. Wasserstein,et al.  Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications , 1997 .

[5]  Michael Ian Shamos,et al.  Computational geometry: an introduction , 1985 .

[6]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[7]  Barry L. Nelson,et al.  Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling , 2008, 2008 Winter Simulation Conference.

[8]  Jie Xu,et al.  Efficient discrete optimization via simulation using stochastic kriging , 2012, Proceedings Title: Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[9]  Loo Hay Lee,et al.  Simulation optimization via kriging: a sequential search using expected improvement with computing budget constraints , 2013 .

[10]  A. Law,et al.  A procedure for selecting a subset of size m containing the l best of k independent normal populations, with applications to simulation , 1985 .

[11]  Barry L. Nelson,et al.  A fully sequential procedure for indifference-zone selection in simulation , 2001, TOMC.

[12]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Sequential design of computer experiments to minimize integrated response functions , 2000 .

[13]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  The Knowledge-Gradient Policy for Correlated Normal Beliefs , 2009, INFORMS J. Comput..

[14]  K. Miller On the Inverse of the Sum of Matrices , 1981 .

[15]  N. Zheng,et al.  Global Optimization of Stochastic Black-Box Systems via Sequential Kriging Meta-Models , 2006, J. Glob. Optim..

[16]  Leonhard Held,et al.  Gaussian Markov Random Fields: Theory and Applications , 2005 .

[17]  L NelsonBarry,et al.  A fully sequential procedure for indifference-zone selection in simulation , 2001 .

[18]  Peter I. Frazier,et al.  Value of information methods for pairwise sampling with correlations , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).