TCAD-Machine Learning Framework for Device Variation and Operating Temperature Analysis With Experimental Demonstration

This work, for the first time, experimentally demonstrates a TCAD-Machine Learning (TCAD-ML) framework to assist the analysis of device-to-device variation and operating (ambient) temperature without the need of physical quantities extraction. The ML algorithm used in this work is the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) followed by third order polynomial regression. After calibrated to limited ‘expensive’ experimental data, ‘low cost’ TCAD simulation is used to generate a large amount of device data to train the ML model. The ML was then used to identify the root cause of device variation and operating temperature from any given experimental current-voltage (I-V) characteristics. We applied this framework to study the ultra-wide-bandgap gallium oxide (Ga2O3) Schottky barrier diode (SBD), an emerging device technology that holds great promise for temperature sensing, RF, and power applications in harsh environments. After calibration, over 150,000 electrothermal TCAD simulations are performed with random variation of physical parameters (anode effective work function, drift layer doping, and drift layer thickness) and operating temperature. An ML model is trained using these TCAD data and we found 1,000–10,000 TCAD data can train an accurate machine. We show that without physical quantities extraction, performing PCA is essential for the TCAD trained ML model to be applicable to analyze experimental characteristics. The physical parameters and temperatures predicted by the ML model show good agreement with experimental analysis. Our TCAD-ML framework shows great promise to accelerate the development of new device technologies with a significantly more efficient process of material and device experimentation.

[1]  Andreas Müller,et al.  Introduction to Machine Learning with Python: A Guide for Data Scientists , 2016 .

[2]  Y. S. Bankapalli,et al.  TCAD Augmented Machine Learning for Semiconductor Device Failure Troubleshooting and Reverse Engineering , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices (SISPAD).

[3]  R. Mickevicius,et al.  Modified Hurkx band-to-band-tunneling model for accurate and robust TCAD simulations , 2020 .

[4]  Akito Kuramata,et al.  Halide vapor phase epitaxy of Si doped β-Ga2O3 and its electrical properties , 2018, Thin Solid Films.

[5]  Matteo Terzi,et al.  Anomaly Detection Approaches for Semiconductor Manufacturing , 2017 .

[6]  Fangyuan Sun,et al.  Anisotropic thermal conductivity in single crystal β-gallium oxide , 2015 .

[7]  David Z. Pan,et al.  Powernet: SOI Lateral Power Device Breakdown Prediction With Deep Neural Networks , 2020, IEEE Access.

[8]  Masataka Higashiwaki,et al.  Guest Editorial: The dawn of gallium oxide microelectronics , 2018 .

[9]  Rui Luo,et al.  Optical proximity correction using a multilayer perceptron neural network , 2013 .

[10]  Marius Grundmann,et al.  Determination of the mean and the homogeneous barrier height of Cu Schottky contacts on heteroepitaxial β‐Ga2O3 thin films grown by pulsed laser deposition , 2014 .

[11]  A. Asenov Statistical Device Variability and Its Impact on Design , 2008 .

[12]  S. Selberherr,et al.  Practical inverse modeling with SIESTA , 1999, 1999 International Conference on Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices. SISPAD'99 (IEEE Cat. No.99TH8387).

[13]  Luca Silvestri,et al.  TCAD simulation methodology for electrothermal analysis of discrete devices including package , 2014, 2014 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & IC's (ISPSD).

[14]  Aaron Voon-Yew Thean,et al.  TCAD-Enabled Machine Learning Defect Prediction to Accelerate Advanced Semiconductor Device Failure Analysis , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices (SISPAD).

[15]  Jelena Vucković,et al.  Inverse design in nanophotonics , 2018, Nature Photonics.

[16]  David Z. Pan,et al.  Machine learning based lithographic hotspot detection with critical-feature extraction and classification , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on IC Design and Technology.

[17]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Characterization of the inhomogeneous barrier distribution in a Pt/(100)β-Ga2O3 Schottky diode via its temperature-dependent electrical properties , 2018 .

[18]  Stephen J. Pearton,et al.  A review of Ga2O3 materials, processing, and devices , 2018 .

[19]  D.B.M. Klaassen,et al.  A unified mobility model for device simulation—I. Model equations and concentration dependence , 1992 .

[20]  Rattapoom Waranusast,et al.  Egg weight prediction and egg size classification using image processing and machine learning , 2017, 2017 14th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON).

[21]  Stephen J. Pearton,et al.  Effect of surface treatments on electrical properties of β-Ga2O3 , 2018, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B.

[22]  D. Antoniadis,et al.  Inverse modeling of MOSFETs using I-V characteristics in the subthreshold region , 1997, International Electron Devices Meeting. IEDM Technical Digest.

[23]  Ming Xiao,et al.  High-voltage vertical Ga2O3 power rectifiers operational at high temperatures up to 600 K , 2019 .

[24]  Xiaodong Yan,et al.  Vertical Ga2O3 Schottky Barrier Diodes With Small-Angle Beveled Field Plates: A Baliga’s Figure-of-Merit of 0.6 GW/cm2 , 2019, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[25]  James S. Speck,et al.  Donors and deep acceptors in β-Ga2O3 , 2018, Applied Physics Letters.

[26]  Asen Asenov,et al.  Machine Learning Approach for Predicting the Effect of Statistical Variability in Si Junctionless Nanowire Transistors , 2019, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[27]  S. Veeraraghavan,et al.  An advanced MOSFET design approach and a calibration methodology using inverse modeling that accurately predicts device characteristics , 1997, International Electron Devices Meeting. IEDM Technical Digest.