Nonlinear seismic responses and lateral force transfer mechanisms of RC frames with different infill configurations

Abstract Due to the architectural efficiency of masonry-infilled reinforced concrete frames, the frames are highly common structural forms for buildings. However, the infills can significantly modify the structural behaviour of these frames, which can be detrimental to the seismic performance of buildings. This study investigates the seismic response and failure mechanisms of infilled RC-frame structures with five different infill configurations: (1) full infills, (2) 2/3-storey-height infills, (3) a soft first storey, (4) infills with window openings and (5) infills with door openings. The nonlinear response history behaviour of the masonry-infilled RC frames under four realistic earthquakes, namely, the 1979 El Centro, 1987 Superstition Hills, 1995 Kobe and 1999 Chi-Chi earthquakes, were simulated using discrete-finite element analysis with damage-based constitutive relations. The analysis indicated that the degrees of continuity and regularity of the infill panels crucially affect the seismic performance of structures. As long as out-of-plane collapse of infills does not occur, full-height and continuous-infill panels can enhance the overall stability and energy dissipation of frame structures. By contrast, discontinuous infills can inflict serious damage localised at the points of discontinuity in the frame members. Furthermore, the analysis revealed that the design concept of “strong column–weak beam” may not be always applicable to infilled frames.

[1]  D. Abrams,et al.  Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Masonry Infills , 1994 .

[2]  Mónica Puglisi,et al.  Modeling of masonry of infilled frames, Part I: The plastic concentrator , 2009 .

[3]  T. Paulay,et al.  Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings , 1992 .

[4]  Adam J Crewe,et al.  Shaking table tests of 1:4 reduced‐scale models of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frame buildings , 2001 .

[5]  P. Benson Shing,et al.  Behaviour and analysis of masonry-infilled frames , 2002 .

[6]  D. J. Kakaletsis,et al.  Influence of Masonry Strength and Openings on Infilled R/C Frames Under Cycling Loading , 2008 .

[7]  Hemant B. Kaushik,et al.  Masonry Infill RC Frames with Openings: Review of In-plane Lateral Load Behaviour and Modeling Approaches , 2012 .

[8]  Francisco J. Crisafulli,et al.  PROPOSED MACRO-MODEL FOR THE ANALYSIS OF INFILLED FRAME STRUCTURES , 2007 .

[9]  Liang Su,et al.  Displacement-based earthquake loss assessment methodology for RC frames infilled with masonry panels , 2013 .

[10]  B Hobbs,et al.  Inelastic Design of Infilled Frames , 1995 .

[11]  Junichi Sakai,et al.  MODIFICATION OF THE GIUFFRE, MENEGOTTO AND PINTO MODEL FOR UNLOADING AND RELOADING PATHS WITH SMALL STRAIN VARIATIONS , 2003 .

[12]  Seyyed Hadi Hashemi,et al.  Seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings including effects of masonry infill walls , 2007 .

[13]  B. Taranath Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings , 2004 .

[14]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake, and seismic design and construction practise in Turkey , 2003 .

[15]  Gerardo M. Verderame,et al.  Influence of infill distribution and design typology on seismic performance of low- and mid-rise RC buildings , 2013, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[16]  Paolo Ricci,et al.  2012 Emilia earthquake, Italy: reinforced concrete buildings response , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[17]  Liborio Cavaleri,et al.  Infilled frames: developments in the evaluation of cyclic behaviour under lateral loads , 2005 .

[18]  E. Oñate,et al.  A plastic-damage model for concrete , 1989 .

[19]  A. Harapin,et al.  Numerical dynamic tests of masonry-infilled RC frames , 2013 .

[20]  Jan G. Rots,et al.  Structural Masonry , 2020 .

[21]  M. Benzeggagh,et al.  Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus , 1996 .

[22]  Paolo Negro,et al.  Effect of Infills on the Global Behaviour of R/C Frames. Energy Considerations from Pseudodynamic Tests , 1996 .

[23]  Gerardo M. Verderame,et al.  The structural role played by masonry infills on RC building performances after the 2011 Lorca, Spain, earthquake , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[24]  Amin Mohebkhah,et al.  Mathematical micromodeling of infilled frames: State of the art , 2013 .

[25]  Yi Liu,et al.  Numerical study of in-plane behaviour and strength of concrete masonry infills with openings , 2015 .

[26]  S. Sloan,et al.  Refined explicit integration of elastoplastic models with automatic error control , 2001 .