Show me your neighbours, and I’ll tell you what you are – cellular microenvironment matters

To answer major questions of cell biology, it is essential to understand cellular complexity. Modern automated microscopes produce vast amounts of images routinely, making manual analysis nearly impossible. Due to their efficiency, machine learning-based analysis software have become essential tools to perform single-cell-level phenotypic analysis of large imaging datasets. However, an important limitation of such methods is that they do not use the information gained from the cellular micro- and macroenvironment: the algorithmic decision is based solely on the local properties of the cell of interest. Here, we present how various microenvironmental features contribute to identifying a cell and how such additional information can improve single-cell-level phenotypic image analysis. The proposed methodology was tested for different sizes of Euclidean and nearest neighbour-based cellular environments both on tissue sections and cell cultures. Our experimental data verify that the microenvironment of a cell largely determines its entity. This effect was found to be especially strong for established tissues, while it was somewhat weaker in the case of cell cultures. Our analysis shows that combining local cellular features with the properties of the cell's microenvironment significantly improves the accuracy of machine learning-based phenotyping.

[1]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Living with noisy genes: how cells function reliably with inherent variability in gene expression. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[2]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  CP-CHARM: segmentation-free image classification made accessible , 2016, BMC Bioinformatics.

[3]  I. Banerjee,et al.  High-Content Analysis of Sequential Events during the Early Phase of Influenza A Virus Infection , 2013, PloS one.

[4]  F. Gasparri,et al.  Quantification of the Proliferation Index of Human Dermal Fibroblast Cultures with the ArrayScan™ High-Content Screening Reader , 2004, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[5]  John A. Tallarico,et al.  Integrating high-content screening and ligand-target prediction to identify mechanism of action. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[6]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , .

[7]  Robert F. Murphy,et al.  A neural network classifier capable of recognizing the patterns of all major subcellular structures in fluorescence microscope images of HeLa cells , 2001, Bioinform..

[8]  Neil O Carragher,et al.  High-Content Phenotypic Profiling of Drug Response Signatures across Distinct Cancer Cells , 2010, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[9]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Nature, Nurture, or Chance: Stochastic Gene Expression and Its Consequences , 2008, Cell.

[10]  Polina Golland,et al.  Scoring diverse cellular morphologies in image-based screens with iterative feedback and machine learning , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Péter Horváth,et al.  Enhanced CellClassifier: a multi-class classification tool for microscopy images , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[12]  Pedro M. Domingos A few useful things to know about machine learning , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[13]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Annotated high-throughput microscopy image sets for validation , 2012, Nature Methods.

[14]  R. Durbin,et al.  Phenotypic profiling of the human genome by time-lapse microscopy reveals cell division genes , 2010, Nature.

[15]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  CellProfiler Analyst: interactive data exploration, analysis and classification of large biological image sets , 2016, bioRxiv.

[16]  Peter Horvath,et al.  Active Learning Strategies for Phenotypic Profiling of High-Content Screens , 2014, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[17]  Lassi Paavolainen,et al.  Advanced Cell Classifier: User-Friendly Machine-Learning-Based Software for Discovering Phenotypes in High-Content Imaging Data. , 2017, Cell systems.

[18]  Zoltan Kato,et al.  Accurate Morphology Preserving Segmentation of Overlapping Cells based on Active Contours , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Pauli Rämö,et al.  CellClassifier: supervised learning of cellular phenotypes , 2009, Bioinform..

[20]  Péter Horváth,et al.  An Object Splitting Model Using Higher-Order Active Contours for Single-Cell Segmentation , 2016, ISVC.

[21]  Zhigang Deng,et al.  Advances in Visual Computing , 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[22]  Thomas Wild,et al.  Machine Learning Improves the Precision and Robustness of High-Content Screens , 2011, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[23]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes , 2006, Genome Biology.

[24]  Lior Shamir,et al.  WND-CHARM: Multi-purpose image classification using compound image transforms , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[25]  Pascal Fua,et al.  SLIC Superpixels Compared to State-of-the-Art Superpixel Methods , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[26]  Roberto Kolter,et al.  Control of cell fate by the formation of an architecturally complex bacterial community. , 2008, Genes & development.

[27]  Staffan Strömblad,et al.  Systems microscopy: an emerging strategy for the life sciences. , 2010, Experimental cell research.

[28]  P. Liberali,et al.  Population context determines cell-to-cell variability in endocytosis and virus infection , 2009, Nature.

[29]  Polina Golland,et al.  CellProfiler Analyst: data exploration and analysis software for complex image-based screens , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.