Understanding the leadership role of the board chairperson through a team production approach

Current corporate governance recommendations – rooted in an investor-based shareholder supremacy model – often narrowly discuss the issue of board leadership as whether or not there is a separation of the CEO and chairperson positions. In this article we employ a team production approach to better understand the leadership role of the board chairperson. We argue that effective board performance is driven by the extent to which corporate directors bring relevant knowledge into the boardroom. An important prerequisite is however that the knowledge must be actively used. In line with this argument, we contend that the competencies and behaviors of the board chairperson are critical in order to unleash a board’s value creating potential.

[1]  G. Yukl.  Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research , 1989 .

[2]  Margaret M. Blair,et al.  A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law , 1999 .

[3]  Jonas Gabrielsson,et al.  Boards of directors in small and medium-sized industrial firms: examining the effects of the board's working style on board task performance , 2000 .

[4]  E. Fama,et al.  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[5]  A. Grinstein,et al.  Characterizing the technology firm: An exploratory study , 2006 .

[6]  Violina P. Rindova,et al.  WHAT CORPORATE BOARDS HAVE TO DO WITH STRATEGY: A COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE* , 1999 .

[7]  Philip Stiles,et al.  Boards at Work: How Directors View their Roles and Responsibilities , 2001 .

[8]  M. Huse,et al.  Corporate boards as assets for operating in the new Europe : The value of process-oriented boardroom dynamics* , 2005 .

[9]  Mark K. Fiegener.  Determinants of Board Participation in the Strategic Decisions of Small Corporations , 2005 .

[10]  J. H. Davis,et al.  TOWARD A STEWARDSHIP THEORY OF MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[11]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  The Strategic Context Of External Network Ties: Examining The Impact Of Director Appointments On Board Involvement In Strategic Decision Making , 2001 .

[12]  Morten Huse,et al.  Researching the dynamics of board—stakeholder relations , 1998 .

[13]  Jonathan L. Johnson,et al.  META-ANALYTIC REVIEWS OF BOARD COMPOSITION, LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE, AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE , 1998 .

[14]  H. Demsetz,et al.  Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization , 1975, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[15]  Rita D. Kosnik.  Greenmail: A Study of Board Performance in Corporate Governance , 1987 .

[16]  C. Daily,et al.  CEO and Board Chair Roles Held Jointly or Separately: Much Ado About Nothing? , 1997 .

[17]  M. Huse.  Relational norms as a supplement to neo-classical understanding of directorates: An empirical study of boards of directors , 1993 .

[18]  M. Huse,et al.  Knowledge and Accountability : Outside Directors' Contribution in the Corporate Value Chain , 2005 .

[19]  W. Judge,et al.  Institutional and Strategic Choice Perspectives on Board Involvement in the Strategic Decision Process , 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[20]  Adrian Cadbury.  Corporate Governance and Chairmanship: A Personal View , 2002 .

[21]  Morten Huse,et al.  Accountability and Creating Accountability: A Framework for Exploring Behavioural Perspectives of Corporate Governance , 2005 .

[22]  Sydney Finkelstein,et al.  Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better , 2003 .

[23]  Beverly Behan,et al.  What makes a great board chair? , 2007, Trustee : the journal for hospital governing boards.

[24]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision making groups , 1999 .

[25]  M. Huse.  Boards, Governance and Value Creation: The Human Side of Corporate Governance , 2007 .

[26]  M. Huse.  Board-management relations in small firms: The paradox of simultaneous independence and interdependence , 1994 .

[27]  M. Huse,et al.  Context, Behavior, and Evolution: Challenges in Research on Boards and Governance , 2004 .

[28]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  THEORY OF THE FIRM: MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR, AGENCY COSTS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE , 1976 .

[29]  Ernie Englander,et al.  A team production model of corporate governance , 2005 .

[30]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Strategists on the Board , 1999 .

[31]  A. Demb,et al.  The corporate board: confronting the paradoxes. , 1992, Long range planning.

[32]  Jonas Gabrielsson.  Boards of Directors and Entrepreneurial Posture in Medium-size Companies , 2007 .

[33]  James D. Westphal.  Collaboration in the Boardroom: Behavioral and Performance Consequences of CEO-Board Social Ties , 1999 .

[34]  M. Huse,et al.  Stakeholders' Expectations of Board Roles: The Case of Subsidiary Boards , 2001 .

[35]  Myles L. Mace,et al.  Directors: Myth and Reality , 1971 .

[36]  Chamu Sundaramurthy,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Board Leadership Structure and Financial Performance: are "two heads better than one"? , 2001 .

[37]  Sanjai Bhagat,et al.  The Non-Correlation between Board Independence And Long-Term Firm Performance , 1998 .

[38]  P. W. Macavoy,et al.  The Recurrent Crisis in Corporate Governance , 2003 .

[39]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Board governance: A social systems perspective , 2004 .

[40]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data , 2003 .

[41]  M. Huse.  Board composition in small enterprises , 1990 .

[42]  Richard W. Leblanc.  Assessing Board Leadership , 2005 .