Induction of immunity and tolerance in vitro by hapten protein conjugates. II. Carrier independence of the response to dinitrophenylated polymerized flagellin
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Sinclair Nr,et al. Neonatal thymectomy and the decrease in antigen-sensitivity of the primary response and immunological "memory" systems. , 1968 .
[2] A. Cunningham,et al. CELL TO CELL INTERACTION IN THE IMMUNE RESPONSE , 1968, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[3] W. Paul,et al. STUDIES ON THE EFFECT OF THE CARRIER MOLECULE ON ANTIHAPTEN ANTIBODY SYNTHESIS , 1966, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[4] H. Wortis,et al. Thymus Dependence of Antibody Response: Variation with Dose of Antigen and Class of Antibody , 1968, Nature.
[5] D. Katz,et al. CARRIER FUNCTION IN ANTI-HAPTEN IMMUNE RESPONSES I. ENHANCEMENT OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ANTI-HAPTEN ANTIBODY RESPONSES BY CARRIER PREIMMUNIZATION , 1970 .
[6] K. Hartmann. INDUCTION OF A HEMOLYSIN RESPONSE IN VITRO , 1970, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[7] A. Cunningham,et al. Further improvements in the plaque technique for detecting single antibody-forming cells. , 1968, Immunology.
[8] K. Rajewsky,et al. THE IMMUNE RESPONSE TO A HYBRID PROTEIN MOLECULE , 1967, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[9] W. Paul,et al. Secondary antibody responses in haptenic systems: cell population selection by antigen. , 1967, Journal of immunology.
[10] P. Gell,et al. Studies on hypersensitivity. I. Delayed and Arthustype skin reactivity to protein conjugates in guinea pigs. , 1959, Immunology.
[11] M. Feldmann,et al. Antibody-mediated suppression of the immune response in vitro. 3. Low zone tolerance in vitro. , 1971, Immunology.
[12] M. Johnson,et al. The antibody response to a 2,4-dinitrophenyl peptide. , 1966, Biochemistry.
[13] M. Raff,et al. The carrier effect in the secondary response to hapten‐protein conjugates. II. Cellular cooperation , 1971, European journal of immunology.
[14] A. Kuckes,et al. Lunar Electrical Conductivity Profile , 1971, Nature.
[15] S. Stockholm,et al. The carrier effect in the secondary response to hapten‐protein conjugates. III. The anatomical distribution of helper cells and antibody‐forming‐cell‐precursors , 1971 .
[16] B. Benacerraf,et al. STUDIES ON HYPERSENSITIVITY IV. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONTACT AND DELAYED SENSITIVITY: A STUDY ON THE SPECIFICITY OF CELLULAR IMMUNE REACTIONS , 1961 .
[17] D. Givol,et al. General Method for the Detection of Cells producing Antibodies against Haptens and Proteins , 1970, Nature.
[18] N. Mitchison. Antigen Recognition Responsible for the Induction In Vitro of the Secondary Response , 1967 .
[19] B. Levine. STUDIES ON DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY. I. INFERENCES ON THE COMPARATIVE BINDING AFFINITIES OF ANTIBODIES MEDIATING DELAYED AND IMMEDIATE HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS IN THE GUINEA PIG. , 1965 .
[20] J. R. Little,et al. Affinity and heterogeneity of antibodies induced by epsilon-2,4-dinitrophenylinsulin. , 1969, Biochemistry.
[21] B. Levine. STUDIES ON THE DIMENSIONS OF THE RABBIT ANTI-BENZYLPENICILLOYL ANTIBODY-COMBINING SITES , 1963, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[22] D. Katz,et al. CARRIER FUNCTION IN ANTI-HAPTEN IMMUNE RESPONSES : II. SPECIFIC PROPERTIES OF CARRIER CELLS CAPABLE OF ENHANCING ANTI-HAPTEN ANTIBODY RESPONSES , 1970 .
[23] N. Klinman. THE SECONDARY IMMUNE RESPONSE TO A HAPTEN IN VITRO , 1971, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[24] B. Benacerraf,et al. Immunological Specificity of the Secondary Response with Dinitrophenylated Proteins.∗ , 1963, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.
[25] Arnold E. Reif,et al. THE AKR THYMIC ANTIGEN AND ITS DISTRIBUTION IN LEUKEMIAS AND NERVOUS TISSUES , 1964, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[26] M. Feldmann. Induction of immunity and tolerance to the dinitrophenyl determinant in vitro. , 1971, Nature: New biology.
[27] J. Miller,et al. The immune response of normal, irradiated and thymectomized mice to fowl immunoglobulin G as detected by a hemolytic plaque technique. , 1971, International archives of allergy and applied immunology.
[28] N. London,et al. The carrier effect in the secondary response to hapten‐protein conjugates. V. Use of antilymphocyte serum to deplete animals of helper cells , 1971, European journal of immunology.
[29] N. Mitchison,et al. The carrier effect in the secondary response to hapten‐protein conjugates. I. Measurement of the effect with transferred cells and objections to the local environment hypothesis , 1971, European journal of immunology.
[30] M. Feldmann,et al. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANTIGENIC STRUCTURE AND THE REQUIREMENT FOR THYMUS-DERIVED CELLS IN THE IMMUNE RESPONSE , 1971, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[31] P. Russell,et al. Induction of Immunity and Tolerance in vitro in the Absence of Phagocytic Cells , 1970, Nature.
[32] W. Paul,et al. The effect of dose in tolerance induction on the subsequent response to a cross-reactive antigen. , 1969, Immunology.
[33] M. Raff. Role of Thymus-derived Lymphocytes in the Secondary Humoral Immune Response in Mice , 1970, Nature.
[34] J. Sprent,et al. CELL TO CELL INTERACTION IN T H E IMMUNE RESPONSE I. HEMOLYSIN-FoRMING CELLS IN NEONATALLY THYMECTOMIZED MICE RECONSTITUTED WITH THYMUS OR , 2003 .
[35] W. Paul,et al. HAPTEN CARRIER RELATIONSHIPS IN THE DNP-PLL·FOREIGN ALBUMIN COMPLEX SYSTEM: INDUCTION OF TOLERANCE AND STIMULATION OF CELLS IN VITRO , 1968, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[36] D. Willoughby,et al. Application of Electron Probe Microanalysis and Electron Microscopy to the Transfer of Antigenic Material , 1970, Nature.
[37] P. Gell,et al. Studies on hypersensitivity. III. The relation between delayed reactivity to the picryl group of conjugates and contact sensitivity. , 1959, Immunology.
[38] R. F. Smith,et al. The specificity of allergic reactions. I. Delayed versus Arthus hypersensitivity. , 1960 .