Induction of immunity and tolerance in vitro by hapten protein conjugates. II. Carrier independence of the response to dinitrophenylated polymerized flagellin

The response to dinitrophenylated polymeric flagellin (DNP POL) in vitro, unlike that to DNP monomeric flagellin (DNP MON) or erythrocyte antigens does not require the presence of T cells. It was thus proposed that antigens with repeating determinants, like DNP POL, may immunize B cells without the cooperation of the usual helper cells. Since carrier specificity in secondary anti‐hapten responses is based upon the cooperation of carrier‐reactive T cells and hapten‐reactive cells, the requirement for carrier‐reactive cells in the response to “thymus‐independent” DNP POL and “thymus‐dependent” DNP MON was investigated. Using flagellin‐primed spleen, the anti‐DNP response to DNP MON was enhanced, but not that caused by DNP POL. Furthermore, there was no carrier specificity in the anti‐DNP responses with DNP POL, which elicited similar responses in spleen cells primed with various DNP proteins, whereas DNP MON only immunized spleen cells which were primed with that carrier. Carrier‐hapten cooperation has also been demonstrated by the suppressive effect of unconjugated carrier on the anti‐hapten response to carrier hapten conjugates. Neither the induction of tolerance to flagellin, the carrier, nor the presence of free flagellin in vitro suppressed the anti‐DNP response to DNP POL. In contrast, both these manoeuvres suppressed the anti‐flagellin response to DNP POL, and both the anti‐DNP and anti‐flagellin responses elicited by DNP MON. Thus, by several criteria, there was no cooperation between carrier‐reactive and hapten‐sensitive cells in the genesis of the response to DNP POL.

[1]  Sinclair Nr,et al.  Neonatal thymectomy and the decrease in antigen-sensitivity of the primary response and immunological "memory" systems. , 1968 .

[2]  A. Cunningham,et al.  CELL TO CELL INTERACTION IN THE IMMUNE RESPONSE , 1968, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[3]  W. Paul,et al.  STUDIES ON THE EFFECT OF THE CARRIER MOLECULE ON ANTIHAPTEN ANTIBODY SYNTHESIS , 1966, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[4]  H. Wortis,et al.  Thymus Dependence of Antibody Response: Variation with Dose of Antigen and Class of Antibody , 1968, Nature.

[5]  D. Katz,et al.  CARRIER FUNCTION IN ANTI-HAPTEN IMMUNE RESPONSES I. ENHANCEMENT OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ANTI-HAPTEN ANTIBODY RESPONSES BY CARRIER PREIMMUNIZATION , 1970 .

[6]  K. Hartmann INDUCTION OF A HEMOLYSIN RESPONSE IN VITRO , 1970, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[7]  A. Cunningham,et al.  Further improvements in the plaque technique for detecting single antibody-forming cells. , 1968, Immunology.

[8]  K. Rajewsky,et al.  THE IMMUNE RESPONSE TO A HYBRID PROTEIN MOLECULE , 1967, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[9]  W. Paul,et al.  Secondary antibody responses in haptenic systems: cell population selection by antigen. , 1967, Journal of immunology.

[10]  P. Gell,et al.  Studies on hypersensitivity. I. Delayed and Arthustype skin reactivity to protein conjugates in guinea pigs. , 1959, Immunology.

[11]  M. Feldmann,et al.  Antibody-mediated suppression of the immune response in vitro. 3. Low zone tolerance in vitro. , 1971, Immunology.

[12]  M. Johnson,et al.  The antibody response to a 2,4-dinitrophenyl peptide. , 1966, Biochemistry.

[13]  M. Raff,et al.  The carrier effect in the secondary response to hapten‐protein conjugates. II. Cellular cooperation , 1971, European journal of immunology.

[14]  A. Kuckes,et al.  Lunar Electrical Conductivity Profile , 1971, Nature.

[15]  S. Stockholm,et al.  The carrier effect in the secondary response to hapten‐protein conjugates. III. The anatomical distribution of helper cells and antibody‐forming‐cell‐precursors , 1971 .

[16]  B. Benacerraf,et al.  STUDIES ON HYPERSENSITIVITY IV. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONTACT AND DELAYED SENSITIVITY: A STUDY ON THE SPECIFICITY OF CELLULAR IMMUNE REACTIONS , 1961 .

[17]  D. Givol,et al.  General Method for the Detection of Cells producing Antibodies against Haptens and Proteins , 1970, Nature.

[18]  N. Mitchison Antigen Recognition Responsible for the Induction In Vitro of the Secondary Response , 1967 .

[19]  B. Levine STUDIES ON DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY. I. INFERENCES ON THE COMPARATIVE BINDING AFFINITIES OF ANTIBODIES MEDIATING DELAYED AND IMMEDIATE HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS IN THE GUINEA PIG. , 1965 .

[20]  J. R. Little,et al.  Affinity and heterogeneity of antibodies induced by epsilon-2,4-dinitrophenylinsulin. , 1969, Biochemistry.

[21]  B. Levine STUDIES ON THE DIMENSIONS OF THE RABBIT ANTI-BENZYLPENICILLOYL ANTIBODY-COMBINING SITES , 1963, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[22]  D. Katz,et al.  CARRIER FUNCTION IN ANTI-HAPTEN IMMUNE RESPONSES : II. SPECIFIC PROPERTIES OF CARRIER CELLS CAPABLE OF ENHANCING ANTI-HAPTEN ANTIBODY RESPONSES , 1970 .

[23]  N. Klinman THE SECONDARY IMMUNE RESPONSE TO A HAPTEN IN VITRO , 1971, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[24]  B. Benacerraf,et al.  Immunological Specificity of the Secondary Response with Dinitrophenylated Proteins.∗ , 1963, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[25]  Arnold E. Reif,et al.  THE AKR THYMIC ANTIGEN AND ITS DISTRIBUTION IN LEUKEMIAS AND NERVOUS TISSUES , 1964, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[26]  M. Feldmann Induction of immunity and tolerance to the dinitrophenyl determinant in vitro. , 1971, Nature: New biology.

[27]  J. Miller,et al.  The immune response of normal, irradiated and thymectomized mice to fowl immunoglobulin G as detected by a hemolytic plaque technique. , 1971, International archives of allergy and applied immunology.

[28]  N. London,et al.  The carrier effect in the secondary response to hapten‐protein conjugates. V. Use of antilymphocyte serum to deplete animals of helper cells , 1971, European journal of immunology.

[29]  N. Mitchison,et al.  The carrier effect in the secondary response to hapten‐protein conjugates. I. Measurement of the effect with transferred cells and objections to the local environment hypothesis , 1971, European journal of immunology.

[30]  M. Feldmann,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANTIGENIC STRUCTURE AND THE REQUIREMENT FOR THYMUS-DERIVED CELLS IN THE IMMUNE RESPONSE , 1971, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[31]  P. Russell,et al.  Induction of Immunity and Tolerance in vitro in the Absence of Phagocytic Cells , 1970, Nature.

[32]  W. Paul,et al.  The effect of dose in tolerance induction on the subsequent response to a cross-reactive antigen. , 1969, Immunology.

[33]  M. Raff Role of Thymus-derived Lymphocytes in the Secondary Humoral Immune Response in Mice , 1970, Nature.

[34]  J. Sprent,et al.  CELL TO CELL INTERACTION IN T H E IMMUNE RESPONSE I. HEMOLYSIN-FoRMING CELLS IN NEONATALLY THYMECTOMIZED MICE RECONSTITUTED WITH THYMUS OR , 2003 .

[35]  W. Paul,et al.  HAPTEN CARRIER RELATIONSHIPS IN THE DNP-PLL·FOREIGN ALBUMIN COMPLEX SYSTEM: INDUCTION OF TOLERANCE AND STIMULATION OF CELLS IN VITRO , 1968, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[36]  D. Willoughby,et al.  Application of Electron Probe Microanalysis and Electron Microscopy to the Transfer of Antigenic Material , 1970, Nature.

[37]  P. Gell,et al.  Studies on hypersensitivity. III. The relation between delayed reactivity to the picryl group of conjugates and contact sensitivity. , 1959, Immunology.

[38]  R. F. Smith,et al.  The specificity of allergic reactions. I. Delayed versus Arthus hypersensitivity. , 1960 .