Treatment planning for carbon ion radiotherapy in Germany: review of clinical trials and treatment planning studies.

The GSI carbon ion radiotherapy facility established the first completely active beam shaping system for heavy ions, using energy variation on the synchrotron and pencil beam scanning. The introduction of an active beam shaping system for carbon ions has considerable impact on the design of the treatment planning system (TPS). The TPS has to account for the capability of the beam delivery and the biological modelling, which is needed to calculate the RBE for the resulting varying depth dose modulation. The TPS used in clinical routine with carbon ions is described and its use in treatment planning studies are outlined. A clinical trial with carbon ion therapy as primary therapy for chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the base of skull has been completed in 2001. Currently, carbon ion therapy as a boost treatment together with conventional conformal photon therapy or IMRT is under investigation in clinical trials for adenoid cystic carcinoma, chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the cervical spine and sacrococcygeal chordoma. Treatment planning studies comparing carbon ion therapy with IMRT, using optimization of combination therapy, and optimization of beam-line design have already been completed. Analysis of uncertainties in treatment planning has been started with the investigation of range uncertainties stemming from CT imaging. Uncertainties coming from the beam delivery play only a minor role. An attempt to asses the uncertainties introduced in treatment plans by the biological modelling, was done, using phantom verification of calculated cell survival levels. The clinical trials and planning studies are of special importance for the upcoming new clinical ion facility of the Heidelberg university hospital.

[1]  Rolf Bendl,et al.  VIRTUOS — A Program for VIRTUal radiotherapy Simulation , 1993 .

[2]  T Kanai,et al.  Spot scanning system for proton radiotherapy. , 1980, Medical physics.

[3]  P. Gutin,et al.  Experience in charged particle irradiation of tumors of the skull base: 1977-1992. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  O Jäkel,et al.  Relation between carbon ion ranges and x-ray CT numbers. , 2001, Medical physics.

[5]  J. Alonso,et al.  A 3-Dimensional Beam Scanning System for Particle Radiation Therapy , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[6]  J Rassow,et al.  Quality assurance for a treatment planning system in scanned ion beam therapy. , 2000, Medical physics.

[7]  S Minohara,et al.  Biophysical characteristics of HIMAC clinical irradiation system for heavy-ion radiation therapy. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  O Jäkel,et al.  Selection of beam angles for radiotherapy of skull base tumours using charged particles. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  J. Debus,et al.  Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Chordomas and Low-Grade Chondrosarcomas of the Skull Base , 2003, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[10]  M Scholz,et al.  Treatment planning for scanned ion beams. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  O Jäkel,et al.  Treatment planning for heavy ion radiotherapy: clinical implementation and application. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  J. Debus,et al.  Radiotherapy for chordomas and low-grade chondrosarcomas of the skull base with carbon ions. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  O Jäkel,et al.  Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: physical beam model and dose optimization. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  D. Schardt,et al.  Magnetic scanning system for heavy ion therapy , 1993 .

[15]  E. Pedroni,et al.  The 200-MeV proton therapy project at the Paul Scherrer Institute: conceptual design and practical realization. , 1995, Medical physics.

[16]  G. Kraft,et al.  Biological verification of heavy ion treatment planning , 1998, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[17]  I. Zuna,et al.  Evaluation of therapeutic potential of heavy ion therapy for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  T. Renner,et al.  Clinical gain from improved beam delivery systems , 1992, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[19]  A Brahme,et al.  Design principles and clinical possibilities with a new generation of radiation therapy equipment. A review. , 1987, Acta oncologica.

[20]  G T Chen,et al.  Beam scanning for heavy charged particle radiotherapy. , 1983, Medical physics.

[21]  J. Debus,et al.  Acute radiation-induced toxicity of heavy ion radiotherapy delivered with intensity modulated pencil beam scanning in patients with base of skull tumors. , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[22]  M Scholz,et al.  Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: calculation and optimization of biologically effective dose. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  J. Debus,et al.  Treatment planning intercomparison for spinal chordomas using intensity-modulated photon radiation therapy (IMRT) and carbon ions. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  I. Zuna,et al.  Optimization of Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Adenoid Cystic Carcinomas with Infiltration of the Skull Base Using Photon Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and a Carbon Ion Boost , 2003, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[25]  J. Alonso.  Review of ion beam therapy: Present and Future , 2000 .

[26]  A Brahme,et al.  Physical and biologic aspects on the optimum choice of radiation modality. , 1982, Acta radiologica. Oncology.

[27]  M. Scholz,et al.  Computation of cell survival in heavy ion beams for therapy , 1997, Radiation and environmental biophysics.