Influencers in design teams: a computational framework to study their impact on idea generation

Abstract It is known that wherever there is human interaction, there is social influence. Here, we refer to more influential individuals as “influencers”, who drive team processes for better or worst. Social influence gives rise to social learning, the propensity of humans to mimic the most influential individuals. As individual learning is affected by the presence of an influencer, so is an individual's idea generation . Examining this phenomenon through a series of human studies would require an enormous amount of time to study both individual and team behaviors that affect design outcomes. Hence, this paper provides an agent-based approach to study the effect of influencers during idea generation. This model is supported by the results of two empirical experiments which validate the assumptions and sustain the logic implemented in the model. The results of the model simulation make it possible to examine the impact of influencers on design outcomes, assessed in the form of exploration of design solution space and quality of the solution. The results show that teams with a few prominent influencers generate solutions with limited diversity. Moreover, during idea generation, the behavior of the teams with uniform distribution of influence is regulated by their team members' self-efficacy.

[1]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  Modeling multidisciplinary design with multiagent learning , 2018, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[2]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Simulated Annealing and the Generation of the Objective Function: A Model of Learning During Problem Solving , 1997, Comput. Intell..

[3]  Innovation and Change in Groups , 2019, Group Processes ‐ Dynamics within and Between Groups, Third Edition.

[4]  Murdock,et al.  The serial position effect of free recall , 1962 .

[5]  Lydia M. Hopper,et al.  Emulation, imitation, over-imitation and the scope of culture for child and chimpanzee , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Pierre Lemarinier,et al.  Agent Based Modelling and Simulation tools: A review of the state-of-art software , 2017, Comput. Sci. Rev..

[7]  C. McComb,et al.  ANALYSING THE EFFECT OF SELF-EFFICACY AND INFLUENCERS ON DESIGN TEAM PERFORMANCE , 2020, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference.

[8]  J. Teasdale.  Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change? , 1978 .

[9]  Gustavo Landfried,et al.  Faithfulness-boost effect: Loyal teammate selection correlates with skill acquisition improvement in online games , 2019, PloS one.

[10]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[11]  Christopher McComb,et al.  KABOOM: an agent-based model for simulating cognitive style in team problem solving , 2019, Design Science.

[12]  B. Latané,et al.  From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. , 1990 .

[13]  Christopher McComb,et al.  Lifting the Veil: Drawing insights about design teams from a cognitively-inspired computational model , 2015 .

[14]  John S. Gero,et al.  Curious agents and situated design evaluations , 2004, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[15]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. , 1987 .

[16]  Federico Morosi,et al.  Extracting and analysing design process data from log files of ICT supported co-creative sessions , 2019 .

[17]  Kyung Ho Lee,et al.  Agent-based collaborative design system and conflict resolution based on a case-based reasoning approach , 2002, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[18]  John S. Gero,et al.  Modelling expertise of temporary design teams , 2004 .

[19]  Ana Cristina Costa,et al.  Work team trust and effectiveness , 2003 .

[20]  Vincent R. Brown,et al.  A Simple Dynamic Model of Social Factors in Group Brainstorming , 1996 .

[21]  M. Banaji.  Affect and memory : an experimental investigation / , 1986 .

[22]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Construct - A Multi-Agent Network Model for the Co-Evolution of Agents and Socio-Cultural Environments , 2004 .

[23]  R. Alexander Bentley,et al.  Stimulated Variation and Cascades: Two Processes in the Evolution of Complex Technological Systems , 2011 .

[24]  C. McComb,et al.  Designing the Characteristics of Design Teams via Cognitively Inspired Computational Modeling , 2018 .

[25]  Vishal Singh.  Computational Studies on the Role of Social Learning in the Formation of Team Mental Models , 2009 .

[26]  Rajnandini Pillai,et al.  Transformational leadership, self‐efficacy, group cohesiveness, commitment, and performance , 2004 .

[27]  Gerhard Weiss,et al.  Computational Organization Theory , 2000 .

[28]  Shelley D. Dionne,et al.  The role of leadership in shared mental model convergence and team performance improvement: An agent-based computational model , 2010 .

[29]  C. Gold,et al.  Dispositional and situational influences on dominance behavior in small groups. , 1983 .

[30]  A. Paivio.  Mental imagery in associative learning and memory , 1969 .

[31]  K. Dugosh,et al.  Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming , 2005 .

[32]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[33]  Kaveepan Lertwachara,et al.  The sequential order and quality of ideas in electronic brainstorming , 2020, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[34]  Tina Eliassi-Rad,et al.  A System for Building Intelligent Agents that Learn to Retrieve and Extract Information , 2003, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[35]  Ian C. Parmee,et al.  Agent-based support within an interactive evolutionary design system , 2002, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[36]  Amir Karniel,et al.  The exponential learning equation as a function of successful trials results in sigmoid performance , 2010 .

[37]  Christopher McComb,et al.  Optimizing Design Teams Based on Problem Properties: Computational Team Simulations and an Applied Empirical Test , 2017 .

[38]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Measuring Engineering Design Self‐Efficacy , 2010 .

[39]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self and Peer Evaluation , 2012 .

[40]  J. Kaufman,et al.  Social influence and creativity in organizations: A multi-level lens for theory, research, and practice , 2007 .

[41]  Kathryn E. Merrick,et al.  Agents for multidisciplinary design in virtual worlds , 2007, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[42]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Spontaneous analogising in engineering design: a comparative analysis of experts and novices , 2004 .

[43]  S. J. Baker.  Exploration of Equality and Processes of Non-Hierarchical Groups , 2015 .

[44]  Frank Proschan.  Theoretical Explanation of Observed Decreasing Failure Rate , 2000, Technometrics.

[45]  Graham Green.  Modelling concept design evaluation , 1997, Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf..

[46]  Hiroki Sayama,et al.  The effects of mental model formation on group decision making: An agent-based simulation , 2011, Complex..

[47]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Thinking in design teams - an analysis of team communication , 2002 .

[48]  Chelpa Lingam,et al.  A SI model for social media influencer maximization , 2019, Applied Computing and Informatics.

[49]  Vincent R. Brown,et al.  Modeling Cognitive Interactions During Group Brainstorming , 1998 .

[50]  Yael Grushka-Cockayne,et al.  The Similarity Heuristic , 2007 .

[51]  Gaetano Cascini,et al.  A Computational Framework for Exploring the Socio-Cognitive Features of Teams and their Influence on Design Outcomes , 2019, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design.

[52]  John S. Gero,et al.  Exploring the Effect of Experience on Team Behavior: A Computational Approach , 2018, Design Computing and Cognition '18.

[53]  Mary T. Dzindolet,et al.  Social influence, creativity and innovation , 2008 .

[54]  Maaike Kleinsmann,et al.  Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects , 2008 .

[55]  John S. Gero,et al.  Constructive memory for situated design agents , 2004, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[56]  John S. Gero,et al.  HOW IMPORTANT IS TEAM STRUCTURE TO TEAM PERFORMANCE , 2011 .

[57]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Group Preference and Convergent Tendencies in Small Groups: A Content Analysis of Group Brainstorming Performance , 1999 .

[58]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  Forgetting in immediate serial recall: decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference? , 2008, Psychological review.

[59]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  The Exploration of Solution Options in Design: A ‘Naturalistic Decision Making’ Perspective. , 2001 .

[60]  Alex H. B. Duffy,et al.  Modeling collective learning in design , 2004, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[61]  Kathleen M. Carley.  A comparison of artificial and human organizations , 1996 .

[62]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A neuroimaging investigation of design ideation with and without inspirational stimuli—understanding the meaning of near and far stimuli , 2019, Design Studies.

[63]  Gaetano Cascini,et al.  Improving Self-efficacy in Solving Inventive Problems with TRIZ , 2016 .

[64]  D. Shohamy,et al.  Preference by Association: How Memory Mechanisms in the Hippocampus Bias Decisions , 2012, Science.

[65]  Heather A. Priest,et al.  Modeling Team Performance: The Basic Ingredients and Research Needs , 2005 .

[66]  P. Paulus.  Groups, Teams, and Creativity: The Creative Potential of Idea-generating Groups , 2000 .

[67]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[68]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[69]  Mary T. Dzindolet,et al.  Social influence processes in group brainstorming. , 1993 .

[70]  John Riker Haymaker,et al.  Multiattribute interaction design: An integrated conceptual design process for modeling interactions and maximizing value , 2011, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[71]  H. Desivilya,et al.  CONFLICT MANAGEMENT IN WORK TEAMS: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL SELF‐EFFICACY AND GROUP IDENTIFICATION , 2005 .

[72]  S. Thompson.  Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[73]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[75]  L. Mui,et al.  A computational model of trust and reputation , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.