Non-prismatic Timoshenko-like beam model: Numerical solution via isogeometric collocation

The present paper combines an effective beam theory with a simple and accurate numerical technique opening the door to the prediction of the structural behavior of planar beams characterized by a continuous variation of the cross-section geometry, that in general deeply influences the stress distribution and, therefore, leads to non-trivial constitutive relations. Accounting for these peculiar aspects, the beam theory is described by a mixed formulation of the problem represented by six linear Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) with non-constant coefficients depending on both the cross-section displacements and the internal forces. Due to the ODEs complexity, the solution can be typically computed only numerically also for relatively simple geometries, loads, and boundary conditions; however, the use of classical numerical tools for this problem, like a (six-field) mixed finite element approach, might entail several issues (e.g., shear locking, ill-conditioned matrices, etc.). Conversely, the recently proposed isogeometric collocation method, consisting of the direct discretization of the ODEs in strong form and using the higher-continuity properties typical of spline shape functions, allows an equal order approximation of all unknown fields, without affecting the stability of the solution. This makes such an approach simple, robust, efficient, and particularly suitable for solving the system of ODEs governing the non-prismatic beam problem. Several numerical experiments confirm that the proposed mixed isogeometric collocation method is actually cost-effective and able to attain high accuracy.

[1]  Dewey H. Hodges,et al.  Stress and strain recovery for the in-plane deformation of an isotropic tapered strip-beam , 2010 .

[2]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Locking-free isogeometric collocation methods for spatial Timoshenko rods , 2013 .

[3]  F. Auricchio,et al.  Single-variable formulations and isogeometric discretizations for shear deformable beams , 2015 .

[4]  T. Hughes,et al.  ISOGEOMETRIC COLLOCATION METHODS , 2010 .

[5]  Mohan Rao Nalluri,et al.  Flapwise bending vibration analysis of functionally graded rotating double-tapered beams , 2015, International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering.

[6]  Mehdi Aminbaghai,et al.  Analytische Berechnung von Voutenstäben nach Theorie II. Ordnung unter Berücksichtigung der M‐ und Q‐Verformungen , 2006 .

[7]  Buntara Sthenly Gan,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF CONSISTENT SHAPE FUNCTIONS FOR LINEARLY SOLID TAPERED TIMOSHENKO BEAM , 2015 .

[8]  E. H. Atkin Tapered Beams: Suggested Solutions for Some Typical Aircraft Cases , 1938 .

[9]  Ferdinando Auricchio,et al.  The dimensional reduction approach for 2D non-prismatic beam modelling: A solution based on Hellinger–Reissner principle , 2015 .

[10]  H. W. Coultas,et al.  Theory of structures , 1927 .

[11]  Ahmad Shooshtari,et al.  An efficient procedure to find shape functions and stiffness matrices of nonprismatic Euler–Bernoulli and Timoshenko beam elements , 2010 .

[12]  Ferdinando Auricchio,et al.  Planar Timoshenko-like model for multilayer non-prismatic beams , 2018 .

[13]  Liping Liu THEORY OF ELASTICITY , 2012 .

[14]  Sai-Kit Yeung,et al.  Isogeometric collocation methods for Cosserat rods and rod structures , 2017 .

[15]  Gaetano Zingone,et al.  Deflections of Beams with Varying Rectangular Cross Section , 1992 .

[16]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis: Toward Integration of CAD and FEA , 2009 .

[17]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Isogeometric collocation methods for the Reissner–Mindlin plate problem , 2015 .

[18]  Ferdinando Auricchio,et al.  Serviceability Analysis of Non-Prismatic Timber Beams: Derivation and Validation of New and Effective Straightforward Formulas , 2017 .

[19]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  An Introduction to Isogeometric Collocation Methods , 2015 .

[20]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Avoiding shear locking for the Timoshenko beam problem via isogeometric collocation methods , 2012 .

[21]  G. Failla,et al.  General finite element description for non-uniform and discontinuous beam elements , 2012 .

[22]  H. Rubin Analytische Berechnung von Stäben mit linear veränderlicher Höhe unter Berücksichtigung von M‐, Q‐ und N‐Verformungen , 1999 .

[23]  D. H. Young,et al.  Theory of Structures , 1965 .

[24]  Josef Eberhardsteiner,et al.  Non-prismatic beams: A simple and effective Timoshenko-like model , 2016 .

[25]  Giulio Alfano,et al.  Analytical derivation of a general 2D non-prismatic beam model based on the Hellinger–Reissner principle , 2015 .

[26]  Bruno A. Boley,et al.  On the Accuracy of the Bernoulli-Euler Theory for Beams of Variable Section , 1963 .

[27]  J. L. Krahula Shear formula for beams of variable cross section , 1975 .

[28]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  An isogeometric collocation approach for Bernoulli–Euler beams and Kirchhoff plates , 2015 .

[29]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  Free vibration and wave propagation analysis of uniform and tapered rotating beams using spectrally formulated finite elements , 2007 .

[30]  Guodong Zhang,et al.  Analysis of three-dimensional curved beams using isogeometric approach , 2016 .

[31]  L. S. Srinath,et al.  Advanced Mechanics of Solids , 1982 .

[32]  Pedro Gonzaga,et al.  Structural analysis of a curved beam element defined in global coordinates , 2008 .

[33]  John B. Kosmatka,et al.  Exact stiffness matrix of a nonuniform beam—II. Bending of a timoshenko beam , 1993 .

[34]  Ferdinando Auricchio,et al.  A new modeling approach for planar beams: finite-element solutions based on mixed variational derivations , 2010 .