Lung allocation score for lung transplantation: impact on disease severity and survival.

BACKGROUND Prior to implementation of the lung allocation score (LAS) system, allocation of donor lungs was based on accrued time on the waiting list and was potentially influenced by center-specific thresholds for listing. The impact of LAS implementation on patient characteristics and survival is unknown. METHODS United Network of Organ Sharing data were obtained on all lung transplant candidates listed and all patients undergoing transplantation in region 6 between May 4, 2003, and May 4, 2006. Each data set was divided into two cohorts: 2 years before LAS implementation, and 1 year after LAS implementation. LAS was calculated and compared by cohort. Pre-LAS and post-LAS differences in patient characteristics were examined. Waiting list and posttransplant survival rates for each cohort were examined using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression. RESULTS After LAS implementation, the distribution of diagnoses in patients undergoing transplantation significantly changed (p = 0.02), while the distribution of diagnoses in those listed did not (p = 0.17). Characteristics of patients on the waiting list were similar, except that a higher proportion of nonwhite patients were listed (p = 0.04) and lower FVC (p < 0.001) was observed after LAS implementation. Similarly, characteristics of patients undergoing transplantation did not change, except that posttransplant hospital length of stay was shorter (p = 0.01) after LAS implementation. Calculated LAS was higher after LAS implementation (p = 0.006). After controlling for age and diagnosis, neither waiting list nor transplant survival was significantly different (p = 0.93 and p = 0.81, respectively). CONCLUSIONS After LAS implementation, the distribution of diagnoses in lung transplant recipients was significantly changed, while that of candidates was not. Posttransplant and waiting list survival were not affected by the LAS system, but power was limited. Larger and long-term survival studies are needed to determine if the LAS system improves overall allocation and survival for patients interested in lung transplantation.

[1]  C. Herrington,et al.  184: 90 day lung transplant mortality following new organ allocation guidelines , 2007 .

[2]  G. Patterson,et al.  14: Impact of the new lung allocation system in the United States , 2007 .

[3]  J. Christie,et al.  Effects of lung allocation score on waiting list rankings and transplant procedures. , 2006, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[4]  Marshall I Hertz,et al.  Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-third official adult lung and heart-lung transplantation report--2006. , 2006, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[5]  F L Grover,et al.  Development of the New Lung Allocation System in the United States , 2006, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[6]  F. Martinez,et al.  International guidelines for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2006 update--a consensus report from the Pulmonary Scientific Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. , 1998, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[7]  R. Kotloff,et al.  Pro/Con debate: lung allocation should be based on medical urgency and transplant survival and not on waiting time. , 2005, Chest.

[8]  Thomas Egan,et al.  Thoracic organ transplantation , 2004, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[9]  L. Edwards,et al.  Current status of thoracic organ transplantation and allocation in the United States. , 2004, Clinical transplants.