On the Problems of Asking for a Definition of Quality in Education

In this article we discuss the problems of asking for a definition of quality in education from a philosophy of language perspective. We take the concept of quality as it appears in higher education discourse as our example. More specifically we discuss the possibility of obtaining a precise, unified definition of quality by addressing the problem of asking “what is” questions. We use definition theory and theory pertaining to linguistic vagueness, including Wittgenstein and the idea of family resemblance. We suggest that quality is an inherently vague concept, which runs us into boundary problems and forces us to operate in grey zones. This means that if your “what is” question is a question for the essence of quality, you make demands that the concept cannot fulfil. Recognition of this fact implies that our expectations concerning concept precision and unity should be modified. Our discussion illuminates why it is so difficult to find a definition of the concept of quality.

[1]  A. Edel,et al.  After virtue, a study in moral theory , 1983 .

[2]  M. Black,et al.  The language of education , 1961 .

[3]  Dale A. Thorpe,et al.  The sorites paradox , 1984, Synthese.

[4]  C. Allen,et al.  Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2011 .

[5]  Lee Harvey,et al.  Transforming Quality Evaluation: Moving On , 2007 .

[6]  Donald F. Westerheijden,et al.  Quality assurance in higher education : trends in regulation, translation and transformation , 2007 .

[7]  Karl R. Popper,et al.  The Open Society and Its Enemies , 1952 .

[8]  Murray L. Wax,et al.  After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. , 1981 .

[9]  H. F. Hansen.  Educational Evaluation in Scandinavian Countries: Converging or Diverging Practices? , 2009 .

[10]  Akira Mizunami,et al.  『The open Society and its Enemies, Vol. I : The Spell of Plato』 by Karl. R. Popper, 1ed., 1945, 2ed., 1952 / 『Plato's modern Enemies and the Theory of Natural Law』 by John Wild, 1964 , 1968 .

[11]  Richard Smith.  Thinking With Each Other: the Peculiar Practice of the University , 2003 .

[12]  D. Carr.  Rival Conceptions of Practice in Education and Teaching , 2003 .

[13]  R. Kantelinen,et al.  Towards a Better Quality and Comparability of Language Education in Finnish Polytechnics , 2009 .

[14]  Michael A. West,et al.  Language In Education , 2007 .

[15]  L. Carroll.  The Complete Works of Lewis Carroll , 1936 .

[16]  Achille C. Varzi.  Vagueness, Logic, and Ontology , 2001 .

[17]  M. Engelmann.  The Philosophical Investigations , 2013 .

[18]  A. Macintyre,et al.  After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. , 1981 .

[19]  S. Lindblom-Ylänne,et al.  “I Study Because I’m Interested”: University Students’ Explanations for Their Disciplinary Choices , 2009 .

[20]  Donald F. Westerheijden,et al.  QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION , 2005, The Egyptian Journal of Surgery.