Reserve Size, Local Human Density, and Mammalian Extinctions in U.S. Protected Areas

: We examined quantitatively the interaction of reserve size and surrounding local human density in the United States and their relative effect on extinction of large mammals in 13 national parks of the western United States. Data on reserve size and human density were obtained from publicly available sources. Local human density was calculated as the mean density in the 50- or 100-km zone surrounding the reserves' borders. Reliable extinction data are extraordinarily hard to find. Using a variety of definitions of extinct, we collated information on extinctions of large mammals (>5 kg) that spanned the size of U.S. national parks as a whole. Human density surrounding reserves varies considerably. Overall, small reserves were in areas of higher human density than were large reserves (p < 0.0001, r 2  =  −0.24, n  =  864; excluding Hawaii), and many of the small reserves were at higher local density than the mean for the contiguous United States. Extinction rates of large mammals correlate significantly with local human density, but not with park area. These findings together emphasize that (1) processes occurring outside of a reserve's boundary may unexpectedly strongly affect species within the reserve; (2) small reserves might suffer the double jeopardy of not only their size but also their situation in especially adverse surrounds; and thus (3) small reserves might suffer more intense edge effects and be more isolated than large reserves. If so, conservation workers need to incorporate the relationship into their models and management decisions. Resumen: Examinamos cuantitativamente la interaccion entre el tamano de la reserva y la densidad humana locales de sus alrededores en los Estados Unidos y sus efectos relativos en la extincion de mamiferos grandes en 13 parques nacionales del oeste del pais. Los datos sobre el tamano de la reserva y la densidad humana fueron obtenidos de fuentes publicas disponibles. La densidad humana local fue calculada como la densidad media en una zona de 50 o 100 km de los alrededores de los limites de una reserva. Los datos confiables de extincion son extraordinariamente dificiles de conseguir. Usando una variedad de definiciones de la palabra extinto cotejamos la informacion sobre extinciones de mamiferos grandes (>5 kg) que abarcaban el tamano de los parques nacionales de los Estados Unidos en su conjunto. La densidad humana circundante a las reservas varia considerablemente. En general, las reservas pequenas se encontraban en areas de mayor densidad humana comparadas con las reservas grandes (p < 0.0001, r 2  =  −0.24, n  =  864 [excluyendo Hawai]), y muchas de las reservas pequenas tuvieron densidades locales mas altas que la media de los Estados Unidos. Las tasas de extincion de mamiferos grandes se correlaciona significativamente con la densidad humana local, pero no con el area del parque. Estos resultados enfatizan de manera conjunta que (1) los procesos que ocurren fuera de los limites de una reserva pueden inesperadamente afectar de manera intensa a las especies de la reserva; (2) las reservas pequenas podrian sufrir una amenaza doble no solo por su tamano, sino tambien por su situacion en ambientes circundantes especialmente adversos; (3) las reservas pequenas podrian sufrir efectos de borde mas intensos y ser mas aisladas que las reservas grandes. Si es asi, la conservacion necesita incorporar esta relacion en sus modelos y en la toma de decisiones para el manejo.

[1]  C. Ravilious,et al.  A global overview of forest conservation , 1997 .

[2]  David J. Currie,et al.  Changing Species Richness and Composition in Canadian National Parks , 2000 .

[3]  R. W. Sellars Preserving Nature in the National Parks: A History , 1997 .

[4]  R. Woodroffe Predators and people: using human densities to interpret declines of large carnivores , 2000 .

[5]  M. Hunter,et al.  Altitudinal Distributions of Birds, Mammals, People, Forests, and Parks in Nepal , 1993 .

[6]  W. Newmark Insularization of Tanzanian Parks and the Local Extinction of Large Mammals , 1996 .

[7]  W. Newmark,et al.  Extinction of mammal populations in Western North American national parks , 1995 .

[8]  T. Nudds,et al.  Insular biogeography of mammals in Canadian parks: a re‐analysis , 1999 .

[9]  V. Heywood,et al.  Global Biodiversity Assessment , 1996 .

[10]  J. Ginsberg,et al.  Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas , 1998, Science.

[11]  A. Harcourt,et al.  Human density as an influence on species/area relationships: double jeopardy for small African reserves? , 2001, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[12]  A. Harcourt,et al.  Is the gorilla a threatened species? How should we judge? , 1996 .

[13]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Conservation Biology in Theory and Practice , 1996 .

[14]  M. Soulé,et al.  Benign neglect: A model of faunal collapse in the game reserves of East Africa , 1979 .

[15]  Jeremy T. Kerr,et al.  Effects of Human Activity on Global Extinction Risk , 1995 .