Molecular core-valence correlation effects involving the post-d elements Ga-Rn: benchmarks and new pseudopotential-based correlation consistent basis sets.

Correlation consistent basis sets that are suitable for the correlation of the outer-core (n-1)spd electrons of the post-d elements Ga-Rn have been developed. These new sets, denoted by cc-pwCVXZ-PP (X=D,T,Q,5), are based on the previously reported cc-pVXZ-PP sets that were built in conjunction with accurate small-core relativistic pseudopotentials (PPs) and designed only for valence nsp correlation. These new basis sets have been utilized in benchmark coupled cluster calculations of the core-valence correlation effects on the dissociation energies and spectroscopic properties of several small molecules. As expected, the most important contribution is the correlation of the (n-1)d electrons. For example, in the case of the group 13 homonuclear diatomics (Ga(2),In(2),Tl(2)), this leads to a dissociation energy increase compared to a valence-only treatment from 1.5 to 3.2 kcal/mol, bond length shortenings from -0.076 to -0.125 Å, and harmonic frequency increases of 7-8 cm(-1). Even in the group 15 cases (As(2),Sb(2),Bi(2)), the analogous effects of (n-1)d electron correlation are certainly not insignificant, the largest values being +4.4 kcal/mol, -0.049 Å, and +9.6 cm(-1) for the effects on D(e), r(e), and ω(e), respectively. In general, the effects increase in magnitude down a group from 4p to 6p. Correlation of the outer-core (n-1)p electrons is about an order of magnitude less important than (n-1)d but larger than that of the (n-1)s. The effect of additional tight functions for Hartree-Fock and valence sp correlation was found to be surprisingly large, especially for the post-4d and post-5d elements. The pseudopotential results for the molecules containing post-3d elements are also compared to the analogous all-electron calculations employing the Douglas-Kroll-Hess Hamiltonian. The errors attributed to the PP approximation are found to be very small.

[1]  Trygve Helgaker,et al.  Basis-set convergence in correlated calculations on Ne, N2, and H2O , 1998 .

[2]  Hans-Joachim Werner,et al.  Coupled cluster theory for high spin, open shell reference wave functions , 1993 .

[3]  Kirk A. Peterson,et al.  Accurate correlation consistent basis sets for molecular core–valence correlation effects: The second row atoms Al–Ar, and the first row atoms B–Ne revisited , 2002 .

[4]  Markus Reiher,et al.  Exact decoupling of the Dirac Hamiltonian. II. The generalized Douglas-Kroll-Hess transformation up to arbitrary order. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[5]  Thom H. Dunning,et al.  Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. V. Core-valence basis sets for boron through neon , 1995 .

[6]  A. Tsekouras,et al.  The electron affinity of gallium nitride (GaN) and digallium nitride (GaNGa): the importance of the basis set superposition error in strongly bound systems. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[7]  P. Knowles,et al.  Erratum: “Coupled cluster theory for high spin, open shell reference wave functions” [ J. Chem. Phys. 99, 5219 (1993)] , 2000 .

[8]  Michael Dolg,et al.  Energy-consistent pseudopotentials and correlation consistent basis sets for the 5d elements Hf-Pt. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[9]  W. D. de Jong,et al.  Heats of formation of xenon fluorides and the fluxionality of XeF(6) from high level electronic structure calculations. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[10]  A. Tsekouras,et al.  Mind the basis set superposition error , 2010 .

[11]  David Feller,et al.  A survey of factors contributing to accurate theoretical predictions of atomization energies and molecular structures. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[12]  B. Ruscic,et al.  W4 theory for computational thermochemistry: In pursuit of confident sub-kJ/mol predictions. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[13]  Demeter Tzeli,et al.  Theoretical investigation of the ground and low-lying excited states of gallium and indium silicides, GaSi and InSi. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[14]  H. Stoll,et al.  Systematically convergent basis sets with relativistic pseudopotentials. II. Small-core pseudopotentials and correlation consistent basis sets for the post-d group 16–18 elements , 2003 .

[15]  W. D. Allen,et al.  Toward subchemical accuracy in computational thermochemistry: focal point analysis of the heat of formation of NCO and [H,N,C,O] isomers. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[16]  K. Peterson.  A theoretical study of the low-lying electronic states of OIO and the ground states of IOO and OIO− , 2010 .

[17]  Hess,et al.  Relativistic electronic-structure calculations employing a two-component no-pair formalism with external-field projection operators. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[18]  Gustavo E. Scuseria,et al.  The open-shell restricted Hartree—Fock singles and doubles coupled-cluster method including triple excitations CCSD (T): application to C+3 , 1991 .

[19]  Jan M.L. Martin,et al.  Correlation consistent valence basis sets for use with the Stuttgart–Dresden–Bonn relativistic effective core potentials: The atoms Ga–Kr and In–Xe , 2001 .

[20]  Nathan J. DeYonker,et al.  Application of the Correlation Consistent Composite Approach (ccCA) to Third-Row (Ga-Kr) Molecules. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[21]  Nathan J. DeYonker,et al.  Systematically convergent correlation consistent basis sets for molecular core-valence correlation effects: the third-row atoms gallium through krypton. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[22]  Branko Ruscic,et al.  High-accuracy extrapolated ab initio thermochemistry. III. Additional improvements and overview. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[23]  S. F. Boys,et al.  The calculation of small molecular interactions by the differences of separate total energies. Some procedures with reduced errors , 1970 .

[24]  Bernd A. Hess,et al.  Revision of the Douglas-Kroll transformation. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[25]  Angela K. Wilson,et al.  Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. IX. The atoms gallium through krypton , 1993 .

[26]  Peter J. Knowles,et al.  Perturbative corrections to account for triple excitations in closed and open shell coupled cluster theories , 1994 .

[27]  Marvin Douglas,et al.  Quantum electrodynamical corrections to the fine structure of helium , 1971 .

[28]  F. Weigend,et al.  Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. , 2005, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[29]  T. H. Dunning.  Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen , 1989 .

[30]  Robert J. Harrison,et al.  Parallel Douglas-Kroll Energy and Gradients in NWChem. Estimating Scalar Relativistic Effects Using Douglas-Kroll Contracted Basis Sets. , 2001 .

[31]  W. A. Jong,et al.  Performance of coupled cluster theory in thermochemical calculations of small halogenated compounds , 2003 .

[32]  J Grant Hill,et al.  Correlation consistent basis sets for molecular core-valence effects with explicitly correlated wave functions: the atoms B-Ne and Al-Ar. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[33]  T. Dunning,et al.  Electron affinities of the first‐row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions , 1992 .

[34]  Jürgen Gauss,et al.  Coupled‐cluster methods with noniterative triple excitations for restricted open‐shell Hartree–Fock and other general single determinant reference functions. Energies and analytical gradients , 1993 .

[35]  F. Weigend,et al.  Gaussian basis sets of quadruple zeta valence quality for atoms H–Kr , 2003 .

[36]  Trygve Helgaker,et al.  Basis-set convergence of correlated calculations on water , 1997 .

[37]  K. Peterson.  Systematically convergent basis sets with relativistic pseudopotentials. I. Correlation consistent basis sets for the post-d group 13–15 elements , 2003 .

[38]  Michael Dolg,et al.  Small-core multiconfiguration-Dirac–Hartree–Fock-adjusted pseudopotentials for post-d main group elements: Application to PbH and PbO , 2000 .

[39]  M. Head‐Gordon,et al.  A fifth-order perturbation comparison of electron correlation theories , 1989 .

[40]  J. Bauschlicher.  Correlation consistent basis sets for indium , 1999 .

[41]  Wenjian Liu,et al.  A small-core multiconfiguration Dirac–Hartree–Fock-adjusted pseudopotential for Tl – application to TlX (X = F, Cl, Br, I) , 2000 .

[42]  B. Shepler,et al.  On the spectroscopic and thermochemical properties of ClO, BrO, IO, and their anions. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[43]  Angela K. Wilson,et al.  Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. X. The atoms aluminum through argon revisited , 2001 .

[44]  Z. Varga,et al.  Molecular constants of aluminum monohalides: caveats for computations of simple inorganic molecules. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[45]  D. Dixon,et al.  Structure and heats of formation of iodine fluorides and the respective closed-shell ions from CCSD(T) electronic structure calculations and reliable prediction of the steric activity of the free-valence electron pair in ClF6-, BrF6-, and IF6-. , 2008, Inorganic chemistry.

[46]  Kirk A Peterson,et al.  Systematically convergent basis sets for transition metals. I. All-electron correlation consistent basis sets for the 3d elements Sc-Zn. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[47]  Michael Dolg,et al.  Energy-consistent relativistic pseudopotentials and correlation consistent basis sets for the 4d elements Y-Pd. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.