Reading for Meaning: The Effects of Concurrent Articulation*

Six experiments are reported which examine the assertion that phonological recoding for the purpose of lexical access in visual word recognition is prevented or impaired by concurrent articulation (“articulatory suppression”). The first section of this paper selectively reviews the literature, and reports two experiments which fail to replicate previous work. The third experiment contrasts performance with visually presented words and with non-words. Latency measures show an effect of suppression that is specific to words, whilst error rates show an effect common to both words and non-words. The fourth experiment shows that if the task is changed from a judgement of rhyme (BLAME-FLAME) to one of homophony (AIL-ALE), the suppression effect seen in the latency data is eliminated, whilst error effects remain. It is suggested that, in addition to producing error effects that are not easily interpretable, suppression prevents or impairs a phonological segmentation process operating subsequent to the retrieval of whole word phonology (a process that is needed for rhyme judgement but not for one of homophony). Experiment V shows that while suppression has no effect on the time taken to decide if printed non-words sound like real words (e.g. PALLIS), error rates increase. Experiment VI shows that suppression has no effect on either RT or errors in the same task if subjects suppress at a slower rate than in Experiment V. It is suggested that there are at least two different phonological codes. Buffer storage and/or maintenance of phonologically coded information derived from print is affected by suppression; phonological recoding from print for the purpose of lexical access can be carried out without any interference from suppression.

[1]  M. Coltheart.  Lexical access in simple reading tasks , 1978 .

[2]  E. Saffran,et al.  Reading without phonology: evidence from aphasia. , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Derek Besner,et al.  Phonological recoding and lexical access , 1978 .

[4]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Verbal Reasoning and Working Memory , 1976 .

[5]  Phonological recoding and the Stroop effect. , 1980, British journal of psychology.

[6]  Maryanne Martin,et al.  Speech recoding in silent reading , 1978 .

[7]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Experiments on the spelling-to-sound regularity effect in word recognition , 1978 .

[9]  Betty Ann Levy,et al.  Speech Processing During Reading , 1978 .

[10]  Glenn M. Kleiman,et al.  Speech recoding in reading , 1975 .

[11]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. , 1976 .

[12]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Word length and the structure of short-term memory , 1975 .

[13]  T Shallice,et al.  Direct visual access in reading for meaning , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[14]  R. Venezky.  The Structure of English Orthography , 1965 .

[15]  J. Marshall,et al.  Syntactic and semantic errors in paralexia , 1966 .

[16]  T. Shallice,et al.  Word Recognition in a Phonemic Dyslexic Patient , 1975, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  R. Glushko.  The Organization and Activation of Orthographic Knowledge in Reading Aloud. , 1979 .

[18]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  How Children Get Meaning from Printed Words. , 1977 .

[19]  E. Spelke,et al.  Skills of divided attention , 1976, Cognition.

[20]  Derek Besner,et al.  This and THAP — Constraints on the Pronunciation of New, Written Words , 1981 .

[21]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Working Memory and Reading , 1979 .

[22]  J. Baron,et al.  Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. , 1976 .

[23]  J. Richardson.  The effects of stimulus attributes upon latency of word recognition. , 1976, British journal of psychology.

[24]  J. Marshall,et al.  Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach , 1973 .

[25]  Sex Differences in the Reading Process Revealed by a Letter-Detection Task , 1979, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Sex differences in imagery and reading , 1975, Nature.

[27]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[28]  E. Gibson,et al.  The Psychology of Reading , 1977 .

[29]  M Coltheart,et al.  Children’s use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  An efficient non-parametric analysis of recognition memory , 1964 .

[31]  Eleanor M. Saffran,et al.  Immediate memory for word lists and sentences in a patient with deficient auditory short-term memory , 1975, Brain and Language.

[32]  E. B. Huey.  The Psychology And Pedagogy Of Reading , 1908 .

[33]  A. Marcel,et al.  Aphasia, dyslexia and the phonological coding of written words. , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical Access and Naming Time. , 1973 .

[35]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition , 1971 .

[36]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Human Visual Cognition , 1979 .

[37]  Derek Besner,et al.  Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Phonemic Stage Not Necessary for Reading , 1973 .

[39]  Charles Carpenter Fries,et al.  Linguistics and reading , 1964 .

[40]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .

[41]  J. Marshall,et al.  Patterns of paralexia: a psycholinguistic approach. , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[42]  Derek Besner,et al.  Phonological Encoding in the Lexical Decision Task , 1979 .

[43]  E. Saffran,et al.  Reading without Phonology: Evidence from Aphasia , 1977 .