VALUE OF DATABASES OTHER THAN MEDLINE FOR RAPID HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS
暂无分享,去创建一个
Liz Dennett | Diane L. Lorenzetti | Leigh-Ann Topfer | D. Lorenzetti | F. Clement | L. Dennett | Fiona Clement | L. Topfer
[1] G. Úrrutia,et al. A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[2] Pamela Royle,et al. LITERATURE SEARCHING FOR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS USED IN COCHRANE REVIEWS: RAPID VERSUS EXHAUSTIVE SEARCHES , 2003, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[3] Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy,et al. MEDLINE versus EMBASE and CINAHL for telemedicine searches. , 2010, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.
[4] D Menon,et al. COMPARISON OF LITERATURE SEARCHES ON QUALITY AND COSTS FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT USING THE MEDLINE AND EMBASE DATABASES , 1999, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[5] T. Turner,et al. Searches for evidence mapping: effective, shorter, cheaper. , 2011, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[6] D. Menon,et al. Health technology assessment in Canada: 20 years strong? , 2009, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[7] David Hailey,et al. Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[8] A. Culyer. International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment , 2014 .
[9] G. Slobogean,et al. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane index most primary studies but not abstracts included in orthopedic meta-analyses. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[10] L. Say,et al. Effectiveness of different databases in identifying studies for systematic reviews: experience from the WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality , 2005, BMC medical research methodology.
[11] D. Lawlor,et al. Searching multiple databases for systematic reviews: added value or diminishing returns? , 2004, Complementary therapies in medicine.
[12] P Corabian,et al. THE USE AND IMPACT OF RAPID HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS , 2000, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[13] Christine Urquhart,et al. Precision of healthcare systematic review searches in a cross‐sectional sample , 2011, Research synthesis methods.
[14] J. Sterne,et al. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. , 2003, Health technology assessment.
[15] Donna Ciliska,et al. Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews , 2010, Implementation science : IS.
[16] D. Moher,et al. An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall , 2006, BMC medical research methodology.
[17] P. Royle,et al. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes , 2005, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.
[18] Jos Kleijnen,et al. What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments. , 2012, International journal of evidence-based healthcare.
[19] Julie Glanville,et al. Identifying economic evaluations for health technology assessment , 2010, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[20] P. Royle,et al. Bmc Medical Research Methodology Open Access a Simplified Search Strategy for Identifying Randomised Controlled Trials for Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions: a Comparison with More Exhaustive Strategies , 2005 .
[21] Arjen Hoogendam,et al. Evaluation of PubMed filters used for evidence-based searching: validation using relative recall. , 2009, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[22] Jesse A Berlin,et al. Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[23] David Hailey,et al. A preliminary survey on the influence of rapid health technology assessments , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[24] David Moher,et al. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach , 2012, Systematic Reviews.
[25] David Moher,et al. Should meta-analysts search Embase in addition to Medline? , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.