GNSS integer ambiguity validation based on posterior probability

GNSS integer ambiguity validation is considered to be a challenge task for decades. Several kinds of validation tests are developed and widely used in these years, but theoretical basis is their weakness. Ambiguity validation theoretically is an issue of hypothesis test. In the frame of Bayesian hypothesis testing, posterior probability is the canonical standard that statistical decision should be based on. In this contribution, (i) we derive the posterior probability of the fixed ambiguity based on the Bayesian principle and modify it for practice ambiguity validation. (ii) The optimal property of the posterior probability test is proved based on an extended Neyman–Pearson lemma. Since validation failure rate is the issue users most concerned about, (iii) we derive the failure rate upper bound of the posterior probability test, so the user can use the posterior probability test either in the fixed posterior probability or in the fixed failure rate way. Simulated as well as real observed data are used for experimental validations. The results show that (i) the posterior probability test is the most effective within the R-ratio test, difference test, ellipsoidal integer aperture test and posterior probability test, (ii) the posterior probability test is computational efficient and (iii) the failure rate estimation for posterior probability test is useful.

[1]  Shaowei Nan,et al.  Integrated method for instantaneous ambiguity resolution using new generation GPS receivers , 1996, Proceedings of Position, Location and Navigation Symposium - PLANS '96.

[2]  Brigitte Gundlich,et al.  Confidence regions for GPS baselines by Bayesian statistics , 2002 .

[3]  Gerhard Beutler,et al.  Rapid static positioning based on the fast ambiguity resolution approach , 1990 .

[4]  Jinling Wang,et al.  A discrimination test procedure for ambiguity resolution on-the-fly , 1998 .

[5]  M. Elizabeth Cannon,et al.  Mixed integer programming for the resolution of GPS carrier phase ambiguities , 2010, ArXiv.

[6]  P. Teunissen,et al.  The ratio test for future GNSS ambiguity resolution , 2013, GPS Solutions.

[7]  Xiaoli Ding,et al.  Ambiguity validation with combined ratio test and ellipsoidal integer aperture estimator , 2010 .

[8]  Shaofeng Bian,et al.  Short baseline GPS multi-frequency single-epoch precise positioning: utilizing a new carrier phase combination method , 2015, GPS Solutions.

[9]  Alexandra Verhagen,et al.  The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation , 2005 .

[10]  Peter Teunissen A carrier phase ambiguity estimator with easy-to-evaluate fail-rate , 2003 .

[11]  Sandra Verhagen,et al.  Ps-LAMBDA: Ambiguity success rate evaluation software for interferometric applications , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[12]  P. Teunissen The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation , 1995 .

[13]  Peiliang Xu,et al.  Voronoi cells, probabilistic bounds, and hypothesis testing in mixed integer linear models , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[14]  P. Teunissen Least-squares estimation of the integer GPS ambiguities , 1993 .

[15]  C. C. J. M. Tiberius,et al.  FAST POSITIONING USING THE LAMBDA-METHOD , 1995 .

[16]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  Integer aperture GNSS ambiguity resolution , 2003 .

[17]  Sandra Verhagen,et al.  New Global Navigation Satellite System Ambiguity Resolution Method Compared to Existing Approaches , 2006 .

[18]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Integer parameter estimation in linear models with applications to GPS , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[19]  Karl-Rudolf Koch,et al.  Bayesian Inference with Geodetic Applications , 1990 .

[20]  H.-J. Euler,et al.  On a Measure for the Discernibility between Different Ambiguity Solutions in the Static-Kinematic GPS-Mode , 1991 .

[21]  Hamdy A. Taha,et al.  Integer Programming: Theory, Applications, and Computations , 1975 .

[22]  Shaowei Han,et al.  Quality-control issues relating to instantaneous ambiguity resolution for real-time GPS kinematic positioning , 1996 .

[23]  Ming Wei,et al.  Fast Ambiguity Resolution Using an Integer Nonlinear Programming Method , 1995 .

[24]  F. Sansò,et al.  The Bayesian approach applied to GPS ambiguity resolution. A mixture model for the discrete–real ambiguities alternative , 2002 .

[25]  Chuang Shi,et al.  Integer estimation methods for GPS ambiguity resolution: an applications oriented review and improvement , 2012 .

[26]  Lei Wang,et al.  A new ambiguity acceptance test threshold determination method with controllable failure rate , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[27]  Sandra Verhagen,et al.  On the probability density function of the GNSS ambiguity residuals , 2006 .

[28]  S. Verhagen Integer ambiguity validation: an open problem? , 2004 .

[29]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  Integer estimation in the presence of biases , 2001 .

[30]  Sandra Verhagen,et al.  The GNSS ambiguity ratio-test revisited: a better way of using it , 2009 .

[31]  Peiliang Xu Parallel Cholesky-based reduction for the weighted integer least squares problem , 2011, Journal of Geodesy.

[32]  徐 培亮,et al.  Mixed Integer Geodetic Observation Models and Integer Programming with Applications to GPS Ambiguity Resolution. , 1998 .

[33]  P. Teunissen integer aperture Estimation A Framework for GNSS Ambiguity Acceptance Testing , 2011 .

[34]  A. Leick GPS satellite surveying , 1990 .

[35]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  GNSS ambiguity resolution with optimally controlled failure-rate , 2005 .