Planning for a Large Dam Project: The Case of Traveston Crossing Dam

The approval for a large dam project proposal these days predominantly involves satisfying broadly the criteria of economic development, social equity, and environmental sustainability. It is justified that the criterion of economic development seeks full project cost recovery as well as significant contribution to economic growth of a region. Cost–benefit analysis is normally used as the yardstick for economic development but it has limitations and a better method is warranted. Social equity considerations should embody the need to address the concerns of all sections in communities to be impacted by a project and involve them in the decision-making process. The lapse of this aspect in project planning of the past has led, at least as being partly responsible, to disastrous consequences. Environmental sustainability should seek to ensure that the vital components of the environment are preserved such that the future generation can use the natural resources to their benefit at least as much as the current generation. Environmental sustainability is arguably the most contentious criteria among these. The vagueness in the concept of environmental sustainability and the tendency of the society to err on the safe side have caused many large dam project proposals not reach their fruition. An attempt is made in this paper to define environmental sustainability in a more meaningful way from an analytic viewpoint. The case of Traveston Crossing Dam project in southeast Queensland, Australia is presented as an illustrative example and to evaluate the performance and relevance of the three broad criteria in a real-world application. The case study is also an example of the fact that environmental awareness can lead to enormous level of socio-political forces which can create many hurdles to cross by a democratic government.

[1]  R. Kadmon,et al.  A SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING THE PERFORMANCE OF CLIMATIC ENVELOPE MODELS , 2003 .

[2]  P. Webster,et al.  Heightened tropical cyclone activity in the North Atlantic: natural variability or climate trend? , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[3]  H. Chappells,et al.  What is fair? Tensions between sustainable and equitable domestic water consumption in England and Wales , 2008 .

[4]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[5]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Optimal adaptive management for the translocation of a threatened species. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[6]  The European Policy on Water Use at the Urban Level in the Context of the Water Framework Directive. Effectiveness, Appropriateness and Efficiency , 2008 .

[7]  John L Stoddard,et al.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. , 2005, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  K. Arrow.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[9]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Limits to the use of threatened species lists , 2002 .

[10]  R. C. Griffin.  Benchmarking in water project analysis , 2008 .

[11]  M. V. Aalst.  The impacts of climate change on the risk of natural disasters , 2006 .

[12]  Judith Petts,et al.  Public engagement to build trust: false hopes? , 2008 .

[13]  M. Huston.  THE THREE PHASES OF LAND‐USE CHANGE: IMPLICATIONS FOR BIODIVERSITY , 2005 .

[14]  Wcd.  Dams and development: A new framework for decision-making , 2000 .

[15]  Luis A. García,et al.  Comparison of different multicriteria evaluation methods for the Red Bluff diversion dam , 2000, Environ. Model. Softw..

[16]  R. Lind,et al.  Intertemporal Equity, Discounting, and Economic Efficiency in Water Policy Evaluation , 1997 .

[17]  Michael R. Penskar,et al.  Identifying potential indicators of conservation value using natural heritage occurrence data. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[18]  K. Engelhardt.  Relating effect and response traits in submersed aquatic macrophytes. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[19]  R. Hueting.  Why environmental sustainability can most probably not be attained with growing production , 2010 .

[20]  I. Faisal,et al.  People versus Power: The Geopolitics of Kaptai Dam in Bangladesh , 2002 .

[21]  Susan K. Jackson,et al.  The biological condition gradient: a descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[22]  C. V. Kidd.  The evolution of sustainability , 1992 .

[23]  Bryan Tilt,et al.  Social impacts of large dam projects: a comparison of international case studies and implications for best practice. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  Wendy B. Trowbridge.  The role of stochasticity and priority effects in floodplain restoration. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[25]  W. Bowman,et al.  Nitrogen critical loads for alpine vegetation and terrestrial ecosystem response: are we there yet? , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[26]  Marshall Flug,et al.  Multicriteria decision analysis applied to Glen Canyon Dam , 2000 .

[27]  J. Deason,et al.  Water policy in the United States: a perspective , 2001 .

[28]  O. Varis,et al.  The Mexico World Water Forum's Ministerial Declaration 2006: A Dramatic Policy Shift? , 2008 .

[29]  H. D. Klerk,et al.  Fynbos (fine bush) vegetation and the supply of water: a comparison of multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis , 1997 .

[30]  Munther J. Haddadin,et al.  Limits of pricing policy in curtailing household water consumption under scarcity conditions , 2008 .

[31]  S. Bell,et al.  Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable? , 1999 .

[32]  David M. Rosenberg,et al.  Large-scale impacts of hydroelectric development , 1997 .

[33]  Sanjeev Khagram,et al.  Dams and Development: Transnational Struggles for Water and Power , 1999 .

[34]  Ximing Cai.  Water stress, water transfer and social equity in Northern China--implications for policy reforms. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[35]  Volker Stix,et al.  A method using weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis for ranking and validity issues in decision making , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[36]  Herlander Mata-Lima.  Human-environment-society interactions: Dam projects as a case example , 2009 .

[37]  A. Bonetto,et al.  Stream regulation in Argentina, including the superior Paraná and Paraguay rivers , 1987 .

[38]  M. Mangel,et al.  Using life history and persistence criteria to prioritize habitats for management and conservation. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[39]  O. Kangas,et al.  Making social policy work for economic development: the Nordic experience , 2009 .

[40]  Tony Jackson.  Mainstreaming Sustainability in Local Economic Development Practice , 2007 .

[41]  S. Platania,et al.  Flow regulation and fragmentation imperil pelagic-spawning riverine fishes. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[43]  Asit K. Biswas,et al.  Impacts of Megaconferences on the Water Sector , 2009 .

[44]  Gautam Gupta,et al.  The Debate over Municipal Water Pricing: Evidence from Kolkata, India , 2007 .

[45]  Zankhana Shah,et al.  In the Midst of the Large Dam Controversy: Objectives, Criteria for Assessing Large Water Storages in the Developing World , 2008 .

[46]  B A Wintle,et al.  Modeling species-habitat relationships with spatially autocorrelated observation data. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[47]  R. Naiman,et al.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.