Active fluidic chip produced using 3D-printing for combinatorial therapeutic screening on liver tumor spheroid.

Known for their capabilities in automated fluid manipulation, microfluidic devices integrated with pneumatic valves are broadly used for researches in life science and clinical practice. The application is, however, hindered by the high cost and overly complex fabrication procedure. Here, we present an approach for fabricating molds of active fluidic devices using a benchtop 3D printer and a simple 2-step protocol (i.e. 3D printing and polishing). The entire workflow can be completed within 6 h, costing less than US$ 5 to produce all necessary templates for PDMS replica molding, which have smooth surface and round-shaped pneumatic valve structures. Moreover, 3D printing can create unique bespoke on-off objects of a wide range of dimensions. The millimeter- and centimeter-sized features allow examination of large-scale biological samples. Our results demonstrate that the 3D-printed active fluidic device has valve control capacities on par with those made by photolithography. Controlled nutrients and ligands delivery by on-off active valves allows generation of dynamic signals mimicking the ever-changing environmental stimuli, and combinatorial/sequential drug inputs for therapeutic screening on liver tumor spheroid. We believe that the proposed methodology can pave the way for integration of active fluidic systems in research labs, clinical settings and even household appliances for a broad range of application.

[1]  J. Lowengrub,et al.  Recapitulating the human tumor microenvironment: Colon tumor-derived extracellular matrix promotes angiogenesis and tumor cell growth. , 2017, Biomaterials.

[2]  Michael C. McAlpine,et al.  3D printed quantum dot light-emitting diodes. , 2014, Nano letters.

[3]  S. Quake,et al.  Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. , 2000, Science.

[4]  Swapnil Bhatia,et al.  A reconfigurable continuous-flow fluidic routing fabric using a modular, scalable primitive. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[5]  J. Lewis,et al.  3D Printing of Interdigitated Li‐Ion Microbattery Architectures , 2013, Advanced materials.

[6]  Ryan A. Kellogg,et al.  Noise Facilitates Transcriptional Control under Dynamic Inputs , 2015, Cell.

[7]  Ivana Gadjanski,et al.  Point-of-Need DNA Testing for Detection of Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria , 2019, Sensors.

[8]  Albert Folch,et al.  3D-Printed Microfluidics. , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.

[9]  C. Curtis,et al.  Organoids reveal cancer dynamics , 2018, Nature.

[10]  M. Kwak,et al.  Directed migration of cancer cells by the graded texture of the underlying matrix , 2016, Nature Materials.

[11]  R. Candler,et al.  3D printed molds for non-planar PDMS microfluidic channels , 2015 .

[12]  Philip Brisk,et al.  Scheduling and Fluid Routing for Flow-Based Microfluidic Laboratories-on-a-Chip , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[13]  S. Nugen,et al.  A hybrid paper and microfluidic chip with electrowetting valves and colorimetric detection. , 2014, The Analyst.

[14]  Anthony Atala,et al.  Organoid-on-a-chip and body-on-a-chip systems for drug screening and disease modeling. , 2016, Drug discovery today.

[15]  Ruitao Su,et al.  3D Printed Polymer Photodetectors , 2018, Advanced materials.

[16]  M. Sefton,et al.  Hepatic organoids for microfluidic drug screening. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[17]  B. Al-Lazikani,et al.  Combinatorial drug therapy for cancer in the post-genomic era , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Koji Sugioka,et al.  Rapid prototyping of three-dimensional microfluidic mixers in glass by femtosecond laser direct writing. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[19]  B. Bay,et al.  Ultrasmall Ferrite Nanoparticles Synthesized via Dynamic Simultaneous Thermal Decomposition for High-Performance and Multifunctional T1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent. , 2017, ACS nano.

[20]  B. Rovin,et al.  When Size Matters: Diagnostic Value of Kidney Biopsy according to the Gauge of the Biopsy Needle , 2013, American Journal of Nephrology.

[21]  L. Defize,et al.  Dawn of the organoid era: 3D tissue and organ cultures revolutionize the study of development, disease, and regeneration , 2017, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[22]  O. Cj,et al.  Frontiers in oncology. , 1990 .

[23]  J. Lewis,et al.  Conformal Printing of Electrically Small Antennas on Three‐Dimensional Surfaces , 2011, Advanced materials.

[24]  J. Muth,et al.  3D Printing of Free Standing Liquid Metal Microstructures , 2013, Advanced materials.

[25]  J. Pollard,et al.  Targeting macrophages: therapeutic approaches in cancer , 2018, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[26]  Marc Alexander Unger,et al.  Multilayer soft lithography of perfluoropolyether based elastomer for microfluidic device fabrication. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[27]  J. McGee,et al.  Monoclonal antibody EBM/11: high cellular specificity for human macrophages. , 1988, Journal of clinical pathology.

[28]  Laura Masullo,et al.  Cerebral organoids at the air-liquid interface generate diverse nerve tracts with functional output , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  High-Content Quantification of Single-Cell Immune Dynamics , 2016, Cell reports.

[30]  M. Madou Fundamentals of microfabrication : the science of miniaturization , 2002 .

[31]  J. Derisi,et al.  Systematic characterization of feature dimensions and closing pressures for microfluidic valves produced via photoresist reflow. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[32]  A. Jayaraman,et al.  A programmable microfluidic cell array for combinatorial drug screening. , 2012, Lab on a chip.