Maximising forward somersault rotation in springboard diving.

Performance in the flight phase of springboard diving is limited by the amounts of linear and angular momentum generated during the takeoff phase. A planar 8-segment torque-driven simulation model combined with a springboard model was used to investigate optimum takeoff technique for maximising rotation in forward dives from the one metre springboard. Optimisations were run by varying the torque activation parameters to maximise forward rotation potential (angular momentum × flight time) while allowing for movement constraints, anatomical constraints, and execution variability. With a constraint to ensure realistic board clearance and anatomical constraints to prevent joint hyperextension, the optimised simulation produced 24% more rotation potential than a simulation matching a 2½ somersault piked dive. When 2 ms perturbations to the torque onset timings were included for the ankle, knee and hip torques within the optimisation process, the model was only able to produce 87% of the rotation potential achieved in the matching simulation. This implies that a pre-planned technique cannot produce a sufficiently good takeoff and that adjustments must be made during takeoff. When the initial onset timings of the torque generators were unperturbed and 10 ms perturbations were introduced into the torque onset timings in the board recoil phase, the optimisation produced 8% more rotation potential than the matching simulation. The optimised simulation had more hip flexion and less shoulder extension at takeoff than the matching simulation. This study illustrates the difficulty of including movement variability within performance optimisation when the movement duration is sufficiently long to allow feedback corrections.

[1]  M F Bobbert,et al.  Dynamics of force and muscle stimulation in human vertical jumping. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  Franklin M. Henry,et al.  Refractoriness of a Fast Movement , 1961 .

[3]  Doris I. Miller,et al.  Greg Louganis' Springboard Takeoff: II. Linear and Angular Momentum Considerations , 1985 .

[4]  F. D. Hales,et al.  The simulation of aerial movement--IV. A computer simulation model. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  M. R. Yeadon,et al.  Twist limits for late twisting double somersaults on trampoline. , 2017, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  M. R. Yeadon,et al.  Functional variability in the flight phase of one metre springboard forward dives. , 2018, Human movement science.

[7]  Mont Hubbard,et al.  Optimal jumping strategies from compliant surfaces: a simple model of springboard standing jumps. , 2004, Human movement science.

[8]  Mark A King,et al.  Modelling the maximum voluntary joint torque/angular velocity relationship in human movement. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Michael J. Hiley,et al.  The mechanics of the backward giant circle on the high bar , 2000 .

[10]  P. Komi,et al.  Interaction between pre-landing activities and stiffness regulation of the knee joint musculoskeletal system in the drop jump: implications to performance , 2002, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[11]  Maurice R Yeadon,et al.  Determining effective subject-specific strength levels for forward dives using computer simulations of recorded performances. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  M J McDonagh,et al.  Stretch reflex distinguished from pre‐programmed muscle activations following landing impacts in man , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  Doris I. Miller,et al.  Optimal Knee Extension Timing in Springboard and Platform Dives from the Reverse Group , 2004 .

[14]  F Stroup,et al.  Rotation, translation, and trajectory in diving. , 1969, Research quarterly.

[15]  C. Munro,et al.  Body segment contributions to height achieved during the flight a springboard dive. , 1984, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  H. Freund,et al.  The relationship between speed and amplitude of the fastest voluntary contractions of human arm muscles , 1978, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Ross Sanders,et al.  Factors Contributing to Maximum Height of Dives after Takeoff from the 3M Springboard , 1988 .

[18]  D. I. Miller A comparative analysis of the take-off employed in springboard dives from the forward and reverse groups , 1974 .

[19]  Maurice R Yeadon,et al.  Considerations that affect optimised simulation in a running jump for height. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Sandro Ridella,et al.  Minimizing multimodal functions of continuous variables with the “simulated annealing” algorithmCorrigenda for this article is available here , 1987, TOMS.

[21]  Maurice R Yeadon,et al.  Optimisation of high bar circling technique for consistent performance of a triple piked somersault dismount. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Maurice R Yeadon,et al.  Parameter determination for a computer simulation model of a diver and a springboard. , 2006, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[23]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control , 1996, Neural Networks.

[24]  Maurice R Yeadon,et al.  Is skilled technique characterized by high or low variability? An analysis of high bar giant circles. , 2013, Human movement science.

[25]  Matthew T G Pain,et al.  Balance control strategies during perturbed and unperturbed balance in standing and handstand , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[26]  H N Zelaznik,et al.  The modification of an already-programmed response: a new interpretation of Henry and Harrison (1961). , 1991, Journal of motor behavior.

[27]  M J Hiley,et al.  The limits of aerial techniques for producing twist in forward 1½ somersault dives. , 2018, Human movement science.

[28]  D. Wolpert Computational approaches to motor control , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.