Volume building as competitive strategy

The competitive strategy and advantage of building contractors is examined. In Hong Kong, just a few contractors have dominated the market of public housing construction, where prefabrication is mandatory. Does prefabrication technology lead to business success? Based on quantitative analysis of a questionnaire survey and its validation with interviews, we find that prefabrication by itself is not regarded as a sustainable source of competitive advantage. Instead, market share is the most statistically significant factor related to business growth. The experience curve theory suggests that, upon acquiring a critical volume of business, contractors have the opportunity to exploit economies of scale, bargaining power and learning to reduce costs to get more business. Through this iterative process, some contractors would manage to innovate their building process to make their supply chain management more efficient and effective than others', thus attaining competitive advantage in cost leadership and getting more business in return to sustain their volume building strategy. The findings suggest that, to succeed in a mature industry such as building construction, it takes clever harnessing of the construction process rather than simply the mastery of prefabrication technology itself.

[1]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The structuring of organizations : a synthesis of the research , 1980 .

[2]  M. Spence,et al.  Learning Curve Spillovers and Market Performance , 1985 .

[3]  Clyde B. Tatum,et al.  Major characteristics of constructed products and resulting limitations of construction technology , 1988 .

[4]  M. Porter From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy , 1989 .

[5]  R. Angelmar Product innovation : a tool for competitive advantage , 1990 .

[6]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[7]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[8]  Clyde B. Tatum,et al.  Noncontractual Methods of Integration on Construction Projects , 1992 .

[9]  Clyde B. Tatum,et al.  Strategies for Technology Push: Lessons from Construction Innovations , 1992 .

[10]  G. Ofori,et al.  Strategic planning for competitive advantage in construction , 1992 .

[11]  Cynthia A. Lengnick-Hall,et al.  Innovation and Competitive Advantage: What We Know and What We Need to Learn , 1992 .

[12]  Anthony Walker Hong Kong: The Contractors’ Experience , 1995 .

[13]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.): with readings , 1995 .

[14]  J. Barney Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[15]  Paul Furlong,et al.  Cross-border trade and contract awards The intellectual myopia at the heart of the EU procurement rules , 1997 .

[16]  Clyde B. Tatum,et al.  Leaders and champions for construction innovation , 1997 .

[17]  M. Porter Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[18]  What is a competitive advantage in the construction industry , 1999 .

[19]  D. Crosthwaite The global construction market: a cross-sectional analysis , 2000 .

[20]  Ranko Bon The Future of International Construction , 2000 .

[21]  A. Aldridge,et al.  Surveying The Social World , 2001 .

[22]  Francis Tekyi Edum-Fotwe,et al.  Measuring construction contractors' organizational learning , 2001 .

[23]  Alan Aldridge,et al.  Surveying the Social World: Principles and Practice in Survey Research , 2001 .

[24]  R. Mushi,et al.  Competitive Strategy in a Context of Low Financial Resources , 2002 .

[25]  Graham Winch,et al.  Re-engineering construction: the role of research and implementation , 2003 .

[26]  David Gann Guest editorial: innovation in the built environment , 2003 .

[27]  Alistair G.F. Gibb,et al.  Re-engineering through pre-assembly: client expectations and drivers , 2003 .

[28]  Graham Winch,et al.  How innovative is construction? Comparing aggregated data on construction innovation and other sectors – a case of apples and pears , 2003 .

[29]  J. Nash,et al.  Strategic decisions and innovation in construction firms , 2003 .

[30]  Martin Sexton,et al.  Appropriate innovation in small construction firms , 2003 .

[31]  Poul Houman Andersen,et al.  Dynamic innovation strategies and stable networks in the construction industry: Implanting solar energy projects in the Sydney Olympic Village , 2004 .

[32]  Karen Manley,et al.  Key influences on construction innovation , 2004 .

[33]  Gerrit De Geest,et al.  The international library of critical writings in economics , 2004 .

[34]  Tim Torvatn,et al.  Building relationships for technological innovation , 2004 .

[35]  Frens Pries,et al.  The role of leaders' paradigm in construction industry change , 2004 .

[36]  John Raftery,et al.  The Construction Sector in the Asian Economies , 2004 .

[37]  H. Gemünden,et al.  The impact of a company's business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success , 2004 .

[38]  D. Gann,et al.  Last among equals: a comparison of innovation in construction, services and manufacturing in the UK , 2005 .

[39]  Florence Yean Yng Ling,et al.  Entry and business strategies used by international architectural, engineering and construction firms in China , 2005 .

[40]  Sven A. Haugland,et al.  The evolution of governance mechanisms and negotiation strategies in fixed-duration interfirm relationships , 2005 .

[41]  E. Chan,et al.  Prefabrication and barriers to entry—a case study of public housing and institutional buildings in Hong Kong , 2006 .

[42]  Peter Walters,et al.  The use of global strategies by British construction firms , 2006 .

[43]  Charles Y. J. Cheah,et al.  Strategic analysis of large local construction firms in China , 2007 .